Improving the Educational Gap with Implementing of Teaching Scholarship in Virtual Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards

IF 0.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Cancer Management Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.5812/ijcm-137490
Zohreh Khoshgoftar, Fatemeh Sodeifian, Farzad Allameh
{"title":"Improving the Educational Gap with Implementing of Teaching Scholarship in Virtual Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards","authors":"Zohreh Khoshgoftar, Fatemeh Sodeifian, Farzad Allameh","doi":"10.5812/ijcm-137490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cancer management has become increasingly challenging due to the emergence of a personalized approach that requires careful assessment, multidisciplinary efforts, and experienced physicians. Objectives: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on executing all medical meetings as well as multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB), we decided to design, perform, and evaluate a teaching scholarship in virtual MTB for urologic cancer patients. Methods: In this prospective study from December 2020 to July 2022, the authors evaluated the designing, implementation, and learning efficacy of a virtual tumor board in the Urology Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU). All the faculty members (N = 25) and urology residents (N = 35) were included in this investigation. To make the sessions multidisciplinary, other related departments including pathology, radio-oncology, medical oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine were also included. Virtual tumor boards were implanted monthly in 20 sessions. Results: A short interview was conducted for the needs assessment. The faculty members' and residents’ statements were divided into high, intermediate, and low importance. After implementation, a satisfaction questionnaire based on the first level of the Kirkpatrick model was recorded and the means were 76% and 71% in faculty members and residents respectively for virtual execution. The results of evaluating the intervention according to the second level of the Kirkpatrick model and through the tests before and after tumor boards were recorded and the mean differences evaluated by paired t test were statistically significant. In the last step for external evaluation, the satisfaction rate of 5 arbitrators was 75% for executing a proper virtual MTB. Conclusions: A virtual board is an effective learning method for the medical education of urology residents. It could help the practitioner to coordinate and discuss with different specialties and lead to the best decision for urologic cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":44764,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm-137490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer management has become increasingly challenging due to the emergence of a personalized approach that requires careful assessment, multidisciplinary efforts, and experienced physicians. Objectives: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on executing all medical meetings as well as multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB), we decided to design, perform, and evaluate a teaching scholarship in virtual MTB for urologic cancer patients. Methods: In this prospective study from December 2020 to July 2022, the authors evaluated the designing, implementation, and learning efficacy of a virtual tumor board in the Urology Department of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU). All the faculty members (N = 25) and urology residents (N = 35) were included in this investigation. To make the sessions multidisciplinary, other related departments including pathology, radio-oncology, medical oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine were also included. Virtual tumor boards were implanted monthly in 20 sessions. Results: A short interview was conducted for the needs assessment. The faculty members' and residents’ statements were divided into high, intermediate, and low importance. After implementation, a satisfaction questionnaire based on the first level of the Kirkpatrick model was recorded and the means were 76% and 71% in faculty members and residents respectively for virtual execution. The results of evaluating the intervention according to the second level of the Kirkpatrick model and through the tests before and after tumor boards were recorded and the mean differences evaluated by paired t test were statistically significant. In the last step for external evaluation, the satisfaction rate of 5 arbitrators was 75% for executing a proper virtual MTB. Conclusions: A virtual board is an effective learning method for the medical education of urology residents. It could help the practitioner to coordinate and discuss with different specialties and lead to the best decision for urologic cancer patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟多学科肿瘤委员会实施教学奖学金以改善教育差距
背景:由于个性化治疗方法的出现,需要仔细的评估、多学科的努力和经验丰富的医生,癌症治疗变得越来越具有挑战性。目的:由于COVID-19大流行对执行所有医学会议以及多学科肿瘤委员会(MTB)的影响,我们决定设计、执行和评估针对泌尿系统癌症患者的虚拟MTB教学奖学金。方法:在2020年12月至2022年7月的前瞻性研究中,作者评估了Shahid Beheshti医科大学(SBMU)泌尿外科虚拟肿瘤板的设计、实施和学习效果。本院全体教职工(N = 25)和泌尿外科住院医师(N = 35)均被纳入调查。为了使会议多学科化,其他相关部门包括病理学、放射肿瘤学、内科肿瘤学、放射学和核医学也被纳入。虚拟肿瘤板每月植入20次。结果:对需求进行了简短的访谈。教师和住院医师的陈述被分为高、中、低重要性。实施后,根据Kirkpatrick模型的第一层次记录满意度问卷,教师和住院医师对虚拟执行的满意度均值分别为76%和71%。根据Kirkpatrick模型第二级和肿瘤板前后检验评价干预的结果,采用配对t检验评价均数差异有统计学意义。在外部评估的最后一步中,对于执行适当的虚拟MTB, 5个仲裁员的满意率为75%。结论:虚拟学习板是泌尿外科住院医师医学教育的有效学习方法。它可以帮助医生与不同的专业进行协调和讨论,从而为泌尿系统癌症患者做出最佳决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: International Journal of Cancer Management (IJCM) publishes peer-reviewed original studies and reviews on cancer etiology, epidemiology and risk factors, novel approach to cancer management including prevention, diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and issues regarding cancer survivorship and palliative care. The scope spans the spectrum of cancer research from the laboratory to the clinic, with special emphasis on translational cancer research that bridge the laboratory and clinic. We also consider original case reports that expand clinical cancer knowledge and convey important best practice messages.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Analgesic Adherence and Influencing Factors in Saudi Cancer Patients Research Progress of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Complicated with Lung Cancer Microvessel Density Assessment and Related Factors in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Challenges of Truth-telling to Patients and Their Families: A Qualitative Study Continued Increase in Incidence of Kidney Cancer in Iran and its 31 Provinces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1