Out of sight, out of mind. Rights, consent, and electroconvulsive therapy

Q4 Psychology Clinical Psychology Forum Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43
Lisa Morrison
{"title":"Out of sight, out of mind. Rights, consent, and electroconvulsive therapy","authors":"Lisa Morrison","doi":"10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a commentary on an audit of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) patient information leaflets in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, which found that they do not comply with the ethical principle of informed consent. Stigma, rights, and trauma are discussed through the authors personal experience of multiple ECT treatments and research, and potential actions to address these failings are suggested.","PeriodicalId":39686,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Forum","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a commentary on an audit of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) patient information leaflets in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, which found that they do not comply with the ethical principle of informed consent. Stigma, rights, and trauma are discussed through the authors personal experience of multiple ECT treatments and research, and potential actions to address these failings are suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼不见,心不烦。权利,同意和电休克疗法
这篇文章是对北爱尔兰、苏格兰和威尔士电痉挛疗法(ECT)患者信息传单审计的评论,发现它们不符合知情同意的伦理原则。作者通过多次ECT治疗和研究的个人经验讨论了耻辱、权利和创伤,并提出了解决这些失败的潜在行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Forum
Clinical Psychology Forum Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Service evaluation of reflective parenting groups: What are parents’ perspectives on the usefulness of RP groups in improving parental mentalisation and reflective functioning? A service evaluation exploring ethnic monitoring in a Specialist Perinatal Mental Health service: Barriers and improvement opportunities Building families through MAR (medically assisted reproduction), donor conception and surrogacy: Where does this fit into clinical psychology? Learning from reflection – good practice in handover with neurodiverse clients Racialised minority women’s experiences of psychological intervention across perinatal and maternal mental health services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1