Research that results in positive social change

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2023.2232615
Andrea Reupert
{"title":"Research that results in positive social change","authors":"Andrea Reupert","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2232615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We already know that ‘good’ research is characterised by rigour, adherence to ethical principles, and an objective, systematic approach to knowledge generation. But what do we mean when we consider research that is good because of its social impact and its beneficial impact on others? In the first instance, research that attests to having a social impact needs to address societal needs and challenges (Reupert, 2018). This means that research questions need to be formulated that directly contribute to improving the wellbeing and quality of life of individuals and communities. Much research has already identified healthcare disparities, the experiences of marginalised groups, and those societal and organisational structures that create inequalities. Likewise, research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic confirmed the significant health care gaps and the health inequalities of certain population groups that have existed for some time (Berger & Reupert, 2020). I would argue that we already know enough about those groups who are most at risk for their mental health; what we need is research that highlights those systems, interventions and structures that help people, families and communities obtain and maintain access to basic social needs and maintain wellbeing. To identify such approaches, research can be conducted that engages with key stakeholders such as those with lived experience and their families, policymakers, practitioners, and advocacy groups. Working with (not ‘on’) end users can foster shared decision-making, co-creation of knowledge, and ensure that research findings are relevant, actionable, and responsive to the needs of those directly impacted (Reupert et al., 2018). Research with a beneficial social impact often scales up successful interventions or solutions, and assesses their impact on a larger population. Evaluating an intervention during the scaling-up process provides an opportunity to identify necessary adaptations or modifications and where different contexts may require adjustments to the intervention to ensure its suitability and effectiveness (Chambers et al., 2013). This stance results in research that has a broad population reach with long term impacts, especially if trailed solutions can be embedded into routine organisational procedures such as client intake forms (Ward et al., 2017). The effective translation and dissemination of research can help bridge the gap between research findings and their application to policy and practice and hence have a positive social impact. Journals play a key part in this process and where the peer review process helps maintain high standards and credibility (Reupert, 2021). Journal articles can also help create networks of references and citations, linking related research articles together. The international scope of this journal allows researchers from different countries and regions to access and engage in research, and foster academic dialogue. The video abstracts, that this journal promotes (Reupert, 2017), also helps to communicate research findings to the wider public. The key remit of this journal is to promote research that supports mental health prevention, promotion and early intervention efforts and thereby, in some small way at least, promote social change that seeks to reduce the incidence of mental illness, promote ways","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2232615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We already know that ‘good’ research is characterised by rigour, adherence to ethical principles, and an objective, systematic approach to knowledge generation. But what do we mean when we consider research that is good because of its social impact and its beneficial impact on others? In the first instance, research that attests to having a social impact needs to address societal needs and challenges (Reupert, 2018). This means that research questions need to be formulated that directly contribute to improving the wellbeing and quality of life of individuals and communities. Much research has already identified healthcare disparities, the experiences of marginalised groups, and those societal and organisational structures that create inequalities. Likewise, research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic confirmed the significant health care gaps and the health inequalities of certain population groups that have existed for some time (Berger & Reupert, 2020). I would argue that we already know enough about those groups who are most at risk for their mental health; what we need is research that highlights those systems, interventions and structures that help people, families and communities obtain and maintain access to basic social needs and maintain wellbeing. To identify such approaches, research can be conducted that engages with key stakeholders such as those with lived experience and their families, policymakers, practitioners, and advocacy groups. Working with (not ‘on’) end users can foster shared decision-making, co-creation of knowledge, and ensure that research findings are relevant, actionable, and responsive to the needs of those directly impacted (Reupert et al., 2018). Research with a beneficial social impact often scales up successful interventions or solutions, and assesses their impact on a larger population. Evaluating an intervention during the scaling-up process provides an opportunity to identify necessary adaptations or modifications and where different contexts may require adjustments to the intervention to ensure its suitability and effectiveness (Chambers et al., 2013). This stance results in research that has a broad population reach with long term impacts, especially if trailed solutions can be embedded into routine organisational procedures such as client intake forms (Ward et al., 2017). The effective translation and dissemination of research can help bridge the gap between research findings and their application to policy and practice and hence have a positive social impact. Journals play a key part in this process and where the peer review process helps maintain high standards and credibility (Reupert, 2021). Journal articles can also help create networks of references and citations, linking related research articles together. The international scope of this journal allows researchers from different countries and regions to access and engage in research, and foster academic dialogue. The video abstracts, that this journal promotes (Reupert, 2017), also helps to communicate research findings to the wider public. The key remit of this journal is to promote research that supports mental health prevention, promotion and early intervention efforts and thereby, in some small way at least, promote social change that seeks to reduce the incidence of mental illness, promote ways
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能带来积极社会变化的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Identity-related problems: direct and indirect associations with emotional intelligence and childhood environment. Patients’ and staff’s experiences of Well-Track physical activity and sleep quality intervention in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service Assessment of the implementation of psychological first aid training: adaptation and validation of determinants of the implementation behavior questionnaire Investigating factors that impact on the uptake of Mental Health First Aid Australia’s Conversations About Gambling course: a qualitative study engaging stakeholder perspectives The relationship between mental health and stress: the moderating role of satisfaction with friendships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1