The way forward from Guild Socialism: a comment on Hodgson

IF 2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Cambridge Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1093/cje/bead045
Mario Ferrero
{"title":"The way forward from Guild Socialism: a comment on Hodgson","authors":"Mario Ferrero","doi":"10.1093/cje/bead045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This note starts from Hodgson’s (2023) thorough review and critique of Guild Socialism and argues that his proposed way forward—a decentralised producer cooperative sector embedded in a competitive market economy—is likely to be a political impossibility. A political economy model of a system of labour-managed firms is outlined which shows that laissez-faire on investment decisions is likely to be outvoted by a capital tax/subsidy scheme that redistributes income from rich coops to poor coops.","PeriodicalId":48156,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Economics","volume":"C-32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bead045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This note starts from Hodgson’s (2023) thorough review and critique of Guild Socialism and argues that his proposed way forward—a decentralised producer cooperative sector embedded in a competitive market economy—is likely to be a political impossibility. A political economy model of a system of labour-managed firms is outlined which shows that laissez-faire on investment decisions is likely to be outvoted by a capital tax/subsidy scheme that redistributes income from rich coops to poor coops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公会社会主义的前进之路:对霍奇森的评论
本文从霍奇森(2023)对行会社会主义的全面回顾和批判开始,并认为他提出的前进道路——将分散的生产者合作部门嵌入竞争性市场经济——在政治上可能是不可能的。本文概述了劳动管理企业体系的政治经济模型,该模型表明,投资决策的自由放任可能会被资本税/补贴计划所取代,该计划将收入从富裕的合作社重新分配给贫穷的合作社。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in 1977 in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, provides a forum for theoretical, applied, policy and methodological research into social and economic issues. Its focus includes: •the organisation of social production and the distribution of its product •the causes and consequences of gender, ethnic, class and national inequities •inflation and unemployment •the changing forms and boundaries of markets and planning •uneven development and world market instability •globalisation and international integration.
期刊最新文献
Economic growth and the foreign sector: Peru 1821–2020 Asymmetrical, symmetrical and artifactual man: group size and cooperation in James Buchanan’s constitutional economics Polyarchy and societas: an extended continuum of discrete structural alternatives What politics does to the economic analysis of the employment relationship: a critical perspective on personnel economics Truth or coherence? How Adam Smith used philosophical sources to explain how paradigms change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1