Physiotherapy students’ rating on lecturers’ and supervisors’ clinical education attributes

Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1142/s1013702524500045
Nana Kwame Safo-Kantanka, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Koranteng Kwakye
{"title":"Physiotherapy students’ rating on lecturers’ and supervisors’ clinical education attributes","authors":"Nana Kwame Safo-Kantanka, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Koranteng Kwakye","doi":"10.1142/s1013702524500045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical education is considered a vital aspect of education of health science students. Attributes of clinical educators play a crucial role in determining the outcome of clinical teaching and learning. A good clinical educator ensures that students get maximum benefits of the clinical learning experience. Objective: To determine the ratings of physiotherapy students on clinical education attributes of lecturers and clinical supervisors. Methods: The study was conducted with 81 clinical physiotherapy students from two universities in Ghana. Two copies of McGill clinical teachers’ evaluation (CTE) tool were used to obtain students’ ratings on their clinical supervisors’ and lecturers’ clinical education attributes. Independent t-test was used to compare the means of students’ level of study and ratings regarding the clinical education attributes of clinical supervisors and lecturers. Results: Students had a high rating on their clinical education attributes of supervisors and lecturers with a mean score of ([Formula: see text]) and ([Formula: see text]), respectively. Rating on clinical education attributes of supervisors ([Formula: see text]) and lecturers ([Formula: see text]) did not differ significantly between the different levels of study. Conclusion: Clinical physiotherapy students rated the clinical education attributes of their lecturers and supervisors high.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013702524500045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical education is considered a vital aspect of education of health science students. Attributes of clinical educators play a crucial role in determining the outcome of clinical teaching and learning. A good clinical educator ensures that students get maximum benefits of the clinical learning experience. Objective: To determine the ratings of physiotherapy students on clinical education attributes of lecturers and clinical supervisors. Methods: The study was conducted with 81 clinical physiotherapy students from two universities in Ghana. Two copies of McGill clinical teachers’ evaluation (CTE) tool were used to obtain students’ ratings on their clinical supervisors’ and lecturers’ clinical education attributes. Independent t-test was used to compare the means of students’ level of study and ratings regarding the clinical education attributes of clinical supervisors and lecturers. Results: Students had a high rating on their clinical education attributes of supervisors and lecturers with a mean score of ([Formula: see text]) and ([Formula: see text]), respectively. Rating on clinical education attributes of supervisors ([Formula: see text]) and lecturers ([Formula: see text]) did not differ significantly between the different levels of study. Conclusion: Clinical physiotherapy students rated the clinical education attributes of their lecturers and supervisors high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
物理治疗专业学生对讲师和导师临床教育属性的评价
背景:临床教育被认为是健康科学专业学生教育的一个重要方面。临床教育工作者的属性在决定临床教学效果方面起着至关重要的作用。一个好的临床教育者可以确保学生在临床学习中获得最大的收益。目的:了解物理治疗专业学生对讲师和临床督导临床教育属性的评价。方法:对来自加纳两所大学的81名临床理疗专业学生进行研究。使用麦吉尔临床教师评价(CTE)工具两份,获得学生对其临床导师和讲师临床教育属性的评分。采用独立t检验比较学生的学习水平与临床督导与讲师临床教育属性评分的均值。结果:学生对导师和讲师的临床教育属性评价较高,平均得分分别为([公式:见文])和([公式:见文])。督导([公式:见文])和讲师([公式:见文])的临床教育属性评分在不同学习水平之间无显著差异。结论:临床理疗专业学生对讲师和导师的临床教育属性评价较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1