A contribution to the nomenclature of peripheral sensory structures (sensory nerve endings).

Abstract

The author has shown the variety in denominating peripheral sensory structures serving for mechanoreception, nociception, thermoreception and chemoreception. To term peripheral sensory structures as nerve endings is considered particularly unsuitable because this denomination is based only on morphogenesis of the ending. From the view of system approach, the peripheral sensory structures forms one unit formed by two or more structural subsystems. Even though the axon or its dendritic zone has the leading role in this unit, the function of the whole formation is influenced (modulated) by further non-nervous components. Although the causes of velocity of adaptation in some sensory structures have been already explained (e.g. in lamellar corpuscles with a thick capsule), different adaptation velocity of Merkel complexes in reptiles and birds on one side, and in mammals on the other, with the same structure has not been clear up to now. From the view of system approach as well as of the share of non-nervous components in the activity of the whole sensory structure, the author has suggested to introduce the term "sensory nerve formation" for peripheral sensory structures serving for mechanoreception, nociception, thermoreception and chemoreception. The term "complex sensory nerve formation" is suggested for more complex sensory structures in which either more sensory nerve formations of the same kind (Pinkus tactile dics) or different kinds of sensory formations (Eimer organ of a mole) are connected constantly or in which the connection of sensory nerve formations with other supporting structures (hairs, feathers) occurs.