Leading without position power: preliminary validation of the multiparty collaborative leadership scale (MCLS)

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Conflict Management Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1108/ijcma-01-2023-0014
Petru Lucian Curseu, Sandra G.L. Schruijer
{"title":"Leading without position power: preliminary validation of the multiparty collaborative leadership scale (MCLS)","authors":"Petru Lucian Curseu, Sandra G.L. Schruijer","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-01-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to report the development of the multiparty collaborative leadership scale (MCLS) that assesses four dimensions of collaborative leadership that have been defined in the literature regarding the functions of collaborative leadership in intra- and interorganizational settings. Design/methodology/approach The authors have tested the validity and reliability of the MCLS in a sample of 110 managers and professionals who participated in five multiparty collaboration workshops, each lasting for two days. The authors used multilevel analyses to test the construct, discriminant and predictive validity of the MCLS. Findings The results generally supported the reliability and validity of the MCLS. The scale has good internal consistency and in terms of validation, the authors show that MCLS negatively predicts the conflictuality and positively predicts the collaborativeness of the leading party as well as trust in the multiparty system and its entitativity. Research limitations/implications The MCLS can be used to extend literature on collaborative leadership and generate insights on the antecedents and consequences of effective collaborative leadership in multiparty systems. Social implications Multiparty systems are set to deal with important societal challenges and mediators involved in multiparty issues are asked to settle important international disputes and conflicts. Understanding collaborative leadership in such systems and its role in establishing effective multiparty collaboration is key. The MCLS can be used as a research instrument and as a development tool toward realizing much-needed collaboration. Originality/value The authors present a first attempt to develop a short scale to assess collaborative leadership in complex systems in which participating stakeholders lack position power.","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-01-2023-0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to report the development of the multiparty collaborative leadership scale (MCLS) that assesses four dimensions of collaborative leadership that have been defined in the literature regarding the functions of collaborative leadership in intra- and interorganizational settings. Design/methodology/approach The authors have tested the validity and reliability of the MCLS in a sample of 110 managers and professionals who participated in five multiparty collaboration workshops, each lasting for two days. The authors used multilevel analyses to test the construct, discriminant and predictive validity of the MCLS. Findings The results generally supported the reliability and validity of the MCLS. The scale has good internal consistency and in terms of validation, the authors show that MCLS negatively predicts the conflictuality and positively predicts the collaborativeness of the leading party as well as trust in the multiparty system and its entitativity. Research limitations/implications The MCLS can be used to extend literature on collaborative leadership and generate insights on the antecedents and consequences of effective collaborative leadership in multiparty systems. Social implications Multiparty systems are set to deal with important societal challenges and mediators involved in multiparty issues are asked to settle important international disputes and conflicts. Understanding collaborative leadership in such systems and its role in establishing effective multiparty collaboration is key. The MCLS can be used as a research instrument and as a development tool toward realizing much-needed collaboration. Originality/value The authors present a first attempt to develop a short scale to assess collaborative leadership in complex systems in which participating stakeholders lack position power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无职位权力的领导:多方协同领导量表(MCLS)的初步验证
本文旨在报告多方协作领导量表(MCLS)的发展,该量表评估了协作领导的四个维度,这些维度已在文献中定义,涉及组织内和组织间环境中的协作领导功能。设计/方法/方法作者在110名经理和专业人员的样本中测试了MCLS的有效性和可靠性,这些经理和专业人员参加了五个多方合作研讨会,每个研讨会持续两天。作者采用多水平分析对mcs的结构、判别效度和预测效度进行了检验。结果总体上支持mcs的信度和效度。量表具有良好的内部一致性,在验证性方面,作者发现MCLS负向预测冲突性,正向预测执政党的协作性以及对多党制及其实体的信任。研究局限/启示MCLS可用于扩展协作领导的文献,并对多方系统中有效协作领导的前因和后果产生见解。社会影响多党制被用来处理重要的社会挑战,参与多党制问题的调解人被要求解决重要的国际争端和冲突。理解这种系统中的协作领导及其在建立有效多方协作中的作用是关键。MCLS可以用作研究工具和开发工具,以实现急需的合作。原创性/价值作者首次尝试开发一个短尺度来评估参与利益相关者缺乏地位权力的复杂系统中的协作领导力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Conflict management 101: how emotional intelligence can make or break a manager The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations Social strife at work: unravelling the link between workplace relationship conflict and employee ostracism behavior Does the conflict between work and family hinder thriving? Role of depersonalization and intrinsic motivation Workplace bullying and employee silence: the role of affect-based trust and climate for conflict management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1