Trust but verify: the effect of religiosity and social conformity on verification of content shared via social media

IF 4.9 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Technology & People Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1108/itp-11-2022-0827
Ashraf Khalil, Salam Abdallah, Rafiq Hijazi, Kundan Sheikh
{"title":"Trust but verify: the effect of religiosity and social conformity on verification of content shared via social media","authors":"Ashraf Khalil, Salam Abdallah, Rafiq Hijazi, Kundan Sheikh","doi":"10.1108/itp-11-2022-0827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to understand the patterns of content-sharing behaviour on major social media platforms by young adult users with reference to how these sharing patterns are influenced by two main sociocultural factors in their lives, religiosity and social conformity. Design/methodology/approach Online surveys including both the ATSCI test for social conformity as well as the Hoge test for religiosity were filled out by 590 participants. In-depth interviews with six participants representative of the same population were conducted to deepen analysis of key variables explored in the surveys. The design of the interviews was semi-structured, whereby the focus was to achieve a general overview of participants' intentions and habits regarding sharing information via social media. Findings The findings show a significant positive impact of religiosity and social conformity on users' sharing intention which, in turn, affects their inclination towards verifying the content they share. Social implications The authors' findings emphasise how users bear the onus of correcting the online information space. It paves the way for future research by recognising the value of independent corroboration amongst users. Originality/value This study lends key support to the growing body of research on social media use in societies in which shared religious and cultural values tend to clearly impact everyday social interaction.","PeriodicalId":47740,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology & People","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology & People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-11-2022-0827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to understand the patterns of content-sharing behaviour on major social media platforms by young adult users with reference to how these sharing patterns are influenced by two main sociocultural factors in their lives, religiosity and social conformity. Design/methodology/approach Online surveys including both the ATSCI test for social conformity as well as the Hoge test for religiosity were filled out by 590 participants. In-depth interviews with six participants representative of the same population were conducted to deepen analysis of key variables explored in the surveys. The design of the interviews was semi-structured, whereby the focus was to achieve a general overview of participants' intentions and habits regarding sharing information via social media. Findings The findings show a significant positive impact of religiosity and social conformity on users' sharing intention which, in turn, affects their inclination towards verifying the content they share. Social implications The authors' findings emphasise how users bear the onus of correcting the online information space. It paves the way for future research by recognising the value of independent corroboration amongst users. Originality/value This study lends key support to the growing body of research on social media use in societies in which shared religious and cultural values tend to clearly impact everyday social interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任但验证:宗教信仰和社会从众对通过社交媒体分享的内容验证的影响
本研究旨在了解年轻成人用户在主要社交媒体平台上的内容分享行为模式,并参考这些分享模式如何受到他们生活中的两个主要社会文化因素,宗教信仰和社会从众性的影响。设计/方法/方法在线调查包括社会从众的ATSCI测试和宗教信仰的Hoge测试,由590名参与者填写。对同一人群中具有代表性的六名参与者进行了深入访谈,以加深对调查中探索的关键变量的分析。访谈的设计是半结构化的,其重点是对参与者通过社交媒体分享信息的意图和习惯进行总体概述。研究结果显示,宗教信仰和社会从众对用户的分享意愿有显著的正向影响,进而影响他们对分享内容进行验证的倾向。作者的发现强调了用户如何承担纠正在线信息空间的责任。它通过承认用户之间独立确证的价值,为未来的研究铺平了道路。这项研究为越来越多的关于社会媒体使用的研究提供了关键支持,在这些社会中,共同的宗教和文化价值观往往会明显影响日常社会互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Technology & People
Information Technology & People INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Information Technology & People publishes work that is dedicated to understanding the implications of information technology as a tool, resource and format for people in their daily work in organizations. Impact on performance is part of this, since it is essential to the well being of employees and organizations alike. Contributions to the journal include case studies, comparative theory, and quantitative research, as well as inquiries into systems development methods and practice.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling real-time mobile connectivity paradox and emotional ambivalence: a quasi-experimental design from a multi-source perspective Understanding consumers' interest in social commerce: the role of privacy, trust and security Evaluating compliance for organizational information security and business continuity: three strata of ventriloqual agency The configurational effects of artificial intelligence-based hiring decisions on applicants' justice perception and organisational commitment Bridging the adoption gap for cryptocurrencies: understanding the affordances that impact approach–avoidance behavior for potential users and continuation usage for actual users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1