Regenerative endodontic procedures in immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis: the impact of microbiology on the clinical and radiographic outcome

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2023.1281337
Rayann Sellami, Wannes Van Holm, Nastaran Meschi, Sarah Van Den Heuvel, Martine Pauwels, Tim Verspecht, Kathleen Vandamme, Wim Teughels, Paul Lambrechts
{"title":"Regenerative endodontic procedures in immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis: the impact of microbiology on the clinical and radiographic outcome","authors":"Rayann Sellami, Wannes Van Holm, Nastaran Meschi, Sarah Van Den Heuvel, Martine Pauwels, Tim Verspecht, Kathleen Vandamme, Wim Teughels, Paul Lambrechts","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2023.1281337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims The current study aimed to determine how the regenerative endodontic procedures (REP) disinfection strategy influences overall bacterial load and REP outcomes. Different bacterial species in the teeth were also examined. Methods A previously reported non-randomized controlled clinical research on REP ± leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin gathered microbial samples from 14 of 29 patients during REP (LPRF). Four microbiological samples were obtained in two treatment sessions. S1 and S2 were taken before and after the first irrigation with 1.5% NaOCl and saline. Samples S3 and S4 were obtained before and after rinsing with 17% EDTA in the second treatment session. Microbial samples were identified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction with species-specific primers. Results The total bacterial load recovered from patients showed a significant ( p < 0.05) decrease after the first treatment and was maintained throughout the second treatment. Fusobacterium nucleatum , Treponema denticola , and Enterococcus faecalis were the most prevalent species in root canals, detected in all analyzed cases (100%), followed by Prevotella intermedia and Tannerella forsythia , both in six of 14 (42.9%) cases. The presence of these abundant species was significantly reduced after S1. Parvimonas micra was present in four of 14 (28.6%) cases and Actinomyces naeslundii in two of 14 (14.3%) cases. Filifactor alocis , Porphyromonas endodontalis , and Porphyromonas gingivalis were each detected in only one of 14 (7.1%) cases. No statistical correlation could be made between bacterial species and clinical or radiographic outcomes due to the small sample size. In the LPRF group, two cases required retreatment due to early post-treatment flare-up, and two other cases presented radiographically a persistent apical periodontitis 3 years after treatment. In the control group, all analyzed cases were clinically asymptomatic after treatment, and radiographically the final periapical index score at the last recall revealed healthy periapices. Conclusion The REP disinfection protocol of the present study seems to be satisfactorily effective in reducing the total bacterial load, omitting clinical symptoms, and inducing periapical bone healing in immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis. LPRF seems to prevent these outcomes from being achieved and should consequently not be recommended in REP.","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2023.1281337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims The current study aimed to determine how the regenerative endodontic procedures (REP) disinfection strategy influences overall bacterial load and REP outcomes. Different bacterial species in the teeth were also examined. Methods A previously reported non-randomized controlled clinical research on REP ± leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin gathered microbial samples from 14 of 29 patients during REP (LPRF). Four microbiological samples were obtained in two treatment sessions. S1 and S2 were taken before and after the first irrigation with 1.5% NaOCl and saline. Samples S3 and S4 were obtained before and after rinsing with 17% EDTA in the second treatment session. Microbial samples were identified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction with species-specific primers. Results The total bacterial load recovered from patients showed a significant ( p < 0.05) decrease after the first treatment and was maintained throughout the second treatment. Fusobacterium nucleatum , Treponema denticola , and Enterococcus faecalis were the most prevalent species in root canals, detected in all analyzed cases (100%), followed by Prevotella intermedia and Tannerella forsythia , both in six of 14 (42.9%) cases. The presence of these abundant species was significantly reduced after S1. Parvimonas micra was present in four of 14 (28.6%) cases and Actinomyces naeslundii in two of 14 (14.3%) cases. Filifactor alocis , Porphyromonas endodontalis , and Porphyromonas gingivalis were each detected in only one of 14 (7.1%) cases. No statistical correlation could be made between bacterial species and clinical or radiographic outcomes due to the small sample size. In the LPRF group, two cases required retreatment due to early post-treatment flare-up, and two other cases presented radiographically a persistent apical periodontitis 3 years after treatment. In the control group, all analyzed cases were clinically asymptomatic after treatment, and radiographically the final periapical index score at the last recall revealed healthy periapices. Conclusion The REP disinfection protocol of the present study seems to be satisfactorily effective in reducing the total bacterial load, omitting clinical symptoms, and inducing periapical bone healing in immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis. LPRF seems to prevent these outcomes from being achieved and should consequently not be recommended in REP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髓质坏死的未成熟恒牙再生根管治疗:微生物学对临床和影像学结果的影响
本研究旨在确定再生牙髓手术(REP)消毒策略如何影响总体细菌负荷和REP结果。还检查了牙齿中不同的细菌种类。方法先前报道的一项关于REP±白细胞和富血小板纤维蛋白的非随机对照临床研究收集了29例REP (LPRF)患者中14例的微生物样本。在两个疗程中获得四种微生物样本。第一次灌胃前后分别用1.5% NaOCl和生理盐水分别取S1和S2。样品S3和S4分别在第二次处理时用17% EDTA冲洗前后获得。微生物样品鉴定采用定量聚合酶链反应与物种特异性引物。结果患者的细菌总负荷呈显著性差异(p <0.05),在第一次治疗后下降,并在第二次治疗期间保持不变。根管中最常见的菌种是核梭菌、齿状密螺旋体和粪肠球菌(100%),其次是中间普雷沃菌和连翘Tannerella,在14例病例中有6例(42.9%)检出。S1后,这些丰富物种的存在显著减少。14例中有4例(28.6%)存在微细小单胞菌,14例中有2例(14.3%)存在naeslundii放线菌。14例中仅检出1例(7.1%)为纤裂单胞菌、牙髓卟啉单胞菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌。由于样本量小,细菌种类与临床或影像学结果之间没有统计学相关性。在LPRF组中,2例因治疗后早期发作而需要再次治疗,另外2例在治疗后3年影像学上表现为持续性根尖牙周炎。在对照组中,所有分析的病例在治疗后均无临床症状,最后一次回忆时的放射学最终根尖周指数评分显示根尖周健康。结论本研究的REP消毒方案在减少牙髓坏死的未成熟恒牙的细菌总负荷、消除临床症状和促进根尖周骨愈合方面具有满意的效果。LPRF似乎阻止了这些结果的实现,因此不应在REP中推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
3D-printed resin composite posterior fixed dental prosthesis: a prospective clinical trial up to 1 year Unique root anatomy of mandibular second premolars: clinical strategies for effective disinfection and preservation of dentine structure in root canal treatment—a case report Editorial: Debates in regenerative dentistry Variability of salivary analytes under daily conditions and their implications for periodontitis biomarkers The importance of visual acuity screening in dental education amongst undergraduate dental students: a straightforward method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1