Shangqi Lu, Wim Martens, Matthias Niewerth, Yufei Tao
{"title":"Partial Order Multiway Search","authors":"Shangqi Lu, Wim Martens, Matthias Niewerth, Yufei Tao","doi":"10.1145/3626956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partial order multiway search (POMS) is a fundamental problem that finds applications in crowdsourcing, distributed file systems, software testing, and more. This problem involves an interaction between an algorithm 𝒜 and an oracle, conducted on a directed acyclic graph 𝒢 known to both parties. Initially, the oracle selects a vertex t in 𝒢 called the target . Subsequently, 𝒜 must identify the target vertex by probing reachability. In each probe , 𝒜 selects a set Q of vertices in 𝒢, the number of which is limited by a pre-agreed value k . The oracle then reveals, for each vertex q ∈ Q , whether q can reach the target in 𝒢. The objective of 𝒜 is to minimize the number of probes. We propose an algorithm to solve POMS in \\(O(\\log _{1+k} n + \\frac{d}{k} \\log _{1+d} n)\\) probes, where n represents the number of vertices in 𝒢, and d denotes the largest out-degree of the vertices in 𝒢. The probing complexity is asymptotically optimal. Our study also explores two new POMS variants: The first one, named taciturn POMS , is similar to classical POMS but assumes a weaker oracle, and the second one, named EM POMS , is a direct extension of classical POMS to the external memory (EM) model. For both variants, we introduce algorithms whose performance matches or nearly matches the corresponding theoretical lower bounds.","PeriodicalId":50915,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems","volume":"1 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3626956","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Partial order multiway search (POMS) is a fundamental problem that finds applications in crowdsourcing, distributed file systems, software testing, and more. This problem involves an interaction between an algorithm 𝒜 and an oracle, conducted on a directed acyclic graph 𝒢 known to both parties. Initially, the oracle selects a vertex t in 𝒢 called the target . Subsequently, 𝒜 must identify the target vertex by probing reachability. In each probe , 𝒜 selects a set Q of vertices in 𝒢, the number of which is limited by a pre-agreed value k . The oracle then reveals, for each vertex q ∈ Q , whether q can reach the target in 𝒢. The objective of 𝒜 is to minimize the number of probes. We propose an algorithm to solve POMS in \(O(\log _{1+k} n + \frac{d}{k} \log _{1+d} n)\) probes, where n represents the number of vertices in 𝒢, and d denotes the largest out-degree of the vertices in 𝒢. The probing complexity is asymptotically optimal. Our study also explores two new POMS variants: The first one, named taciturn POMS , is similar to classical POMS but assumes a weaker oracle, and the second one, named EM POMS , is a direct extension of classical POMS to the external memory (EM) model. For both variants, we introduce algorithms whose performance matches or nearly matches the corresponding theoretical lower bounds.
期刊介绍:
Heavily used in both academic and corporate R&D settings, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) is a key publication for computer scientists working in data abstraction, data modeling, and designing data management systems. Topics include storage and retrieval, transaction management, distributed and federated databases, semantics of data, intelligent databases, and operations and algorithms relating to these areas. In this rapidly changing field, TODS provides insights into the thoughts of the best minds in database R&D.