Aloysius V. Diamond Bank Plc: Opening a New Vista on Security of Employment in Nigeria through the Application of International Labour Organisation Conventions

David Tarh-Akong Eyongndi, Adekunbi Imosemi
{"title":"<i>Aloysius V. Diamond Bank Plc</i>: Opening a New Vista on Security of Employment in Nigeria through the Application of International Labour Organisation Conventions","authors":"David Tarh-Akong Eyongndi, Adekunbi Imosemi","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2023.0453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At common law, the employer is entitled to terminate the employment of an employee, for any reason or no reason at all. At present, the level of unemployment in Nigeria is gargantuan, coupled with a high rate of employment insecurity. In 2010 the status and stature of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) were enhanced by the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Third Alteration) Act, 2010, which vests the NICN with exclusive original civil jurisdiction over labour and employment matters, powers it to apply international best practices (IBP) and international labour standards (ILS) as contained in section 254C(1)(f) and (h) thereof. In 2015 the NICN, according to this section, held that an employer, in master–servant employment, following IBPs and ILSs, cannot terminate the employment of an employee save for good and justifiable reasons. This judgment has attracted various criticisms owing to its iconoclastic nature. This article, through the doctrinal method, examines the validity of this judgment vis-à-vis section 12 of the 1999 CFRN and subsisting appellate courts judgments. It argues that the judgment is not only valid but a welcome development and has opened a new vista on security of employment in Nigeria and has brought the law into conformity with international best practices and standards. Going forward, the article argues for the affirming of the decision by the Court of Appeal as the apex court on appeals from the NICN and for wide publicity by trade unions and workers groups for its exploitation by their members.","PeriodicalId":42692,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2023.0453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At common law, the employer is entitled to terminate the employment of an employee, for any reason or no reason at all. At present, the level of unemployment in Nigeria is gargantuan, coupled with a high rate of employment insecurity. In 2010 the status and stature of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) were enhanced by the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Third Alteration) Act, 2010, which vests the NICN with exclusive original civil jurisdiction over labour and employment matters, powers it to apply international best practices (IBP) and international labour standards (ILS) as contained in section 254C(1)(f) and (h) thereof. In 2015 the NICN, according to this section, held that an employer, in master–servant employment, following IBPs and ILSs, cannot terminate the employment of an employee save for good and justifiable reasons. This judgment has attracted various criticisms owing to its iconoclastic nature. This article, through the doctrinal method, examines the validity of this judgment vis-à-vis section 12 of the 1999 CFRN and subsisting appellate courts judgments. It argues that the judgment is not only valid but a welcome development and has opened a new vista on security of employment in Nigeria and has brought the law into conformity with international best practices and standards. Going forward, the article argues for the affirming of the decision by the Court of Appeal as the apex court on appeals from the NICN and for wide publicity by trade unions and workers groups for its exploitation by their members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aloysius V. Diamond Bank Plc:通过应用国际劳工组织公约,在尼日利亚开启就业安全的新前景
在普通法上,雇主有权以任何理由或根本没有理由终止雇员的雇佣。目前,尼日利亚的失业水平非常高,加上就业不安全感很高。2010年,1999年《尼日利亚联邦共和国宪法(第三次修改)法》提高了尼日利亚国家工业法院(NICN)的地位和地位,该法赋予NICN对劳工和就业事务的独家原始民事管辖权,并授权其适用第254C(1)(f)和(h)条所载的国际最佳做法(IBP)和国际劳工标准(ILS)。2015年,NICN根据这一节,认为雇主,在主仆雇佣,遵循ibp和ils,不能终止雇员的雇佣,除非有充分和正当的理由。这一判断由于其打破传统的性质而引起了各种批评。本文通过理论方法,参照-à-vis《1999年联邦判例法》第12条和现有上诉法院的判决,考察了这一判决的有效性。它认为,该判决不仅有效,而且是一项受欢迎的事态发展,为尼日利亚的就业安全开辟了新的前景,并使法律符合国际最佳做法和标准。展望未来,文章主张维持上诉法院作为NICN上诉的最高法院的裁决,并主张工会和工人团体广泛宣传其成员受到剥削的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of South Africa's Maternity and Parental Benefits Legislation in Light of the International Labour Organisation's Maternity Protection Convention and Recommendation Front matter The Supreme Court of Uganda and the Right to Bail Pending Appeal: Understanding Nakiwuge Racheal Muleke v Uganda (Criminal Reference No.12 Of 2020) (9 September 2021) Corporate Accountability to Local Communities for Investment-Related Harms: The Elusive Promise of Balanced Investment Treaties The Igiogbe Custom as a Mandatory Norm in Conflict of Laws: An Exploration of Nigerian Appellate Court Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1