Fair Working Conditions for Workers Providing Informal Care for the Elderly in Poland and in the Netherlands

IF 0.6 Q2 Social Sciences Utrecht Law Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36633/ulr.879
Agnieszka Furmańska-Maruszak, Susanne Heeger-Hertter
{"title":"Fair Working Conditions for Workers Providing Informal Care for the Elderly in Poland and in the Netherlands","authors":"Agnieszka Furmańska-Maruszak, Susanne Heeger-Hertter","doi":"10.36633/ulr.879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper addresses the question how and to what extent EU law instruments (the European Pillar of Social Rights, the Work-Life Balance Directive and the developing European Care Strategy) contribute to creating and/or facilitating fair working conditions for informal carers for the elderly in Poland and in the Netherlands. The analysis revealed that due to the differences in the situations of informal carers (intensity of care provided and the support for informal carers in the social and healthcare sectors) as well the differences in access to formal long-term care, the extent of EU law contributions in each country varies significantly. While in the Netherlands the most necessary actions to be taken are related to gender equality and working conditions of informal carers who mainly work part-time, in Poland the necessary actions cover different and much broader issues related to access to formal long-term care services as well as support and formal recognition of carers.","PeriodicalId":44535,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Law Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utrecht Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper addresses the question how and to what extent EU law instruments (the European Pillar of Social Rights, the Work-Life Balance Directive and the developing European Care Strategy) contribute to creating and/or facilitating fair working conditions for informal carers for the elderly in Poland and in the Netherlands. The analysis revealed that due to the differences in the situations of informal carers (intensity of care provided and the support for informal carers in the social and healthcare sectors) as well the differences in access to formal long-term care, the extent of EU law contributions in each country varies significantly. While in the Netherlands the most necessary actions to be taken are related to gender equality and working conditions of informal carers who mainly work part-time, in Poland the necessary actions cover different and much broader issues related to access to formal long-term care services as well as support and formal recognition of carers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰和荷兰为老年人提供非正式护理的工人的公平工作条件
本文探讨了欧盟法律文书(欧洲社会权利支柱、工作与生活平衡指令和发展中的欧洲护理战略)如何以及在多大程度上有助于为波兰和荷兰的老年人非正式护理人员创造和/或促进公平的工作条件。分析显示,由于非正式照顾者的情况不同(社会和保健部门对非正式照顾者提供的照顾强度和支持),以及在获得正式长期照顾方面的差异,欧盟法律在每个国家的贡献程度差别很大。在荷兰,需要采取的最必要的行动涉及主要从事非全时工作的非正式护理人员的性别平等和工作条件,而在波兰,必要的行动涉及与获得正式长期护理服务以及对护理人员的支持和正式承认有关的不同和更广泛的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Field Experiments Examining Trust in Law: Interviewer Effects on Participants with Lower Educational Backgrounds Legitimacy as Expressed versus Legitimacy as Experienced: Methodologies to Assess an Elusive Concept Towards Evidence-Based Legitimacy Interventions in EU Law: Challenges and Directions for Empirical Research Digitalisation of Enforcement Proceedings (Re)defining Conflicts: Democratic Legitimacy in Socially Sensitive Court Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1