The categorisation of questions in the assessment of language subjects for multilingual learners in South African primary schools

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS South African Journal of African Languages Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/02572117.2023.2248739
Nonhlanhla Ntuli, Ramona Kunene Nicolas
{"title":"The categorisation of questions in the assessment of language subjects for multilingual learners in South African primary schools","authors":"Nonhlanhla Ntuli, Ramona Kunene Nicolas","doi":"10.1080/02572117.2023.2248739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study examines the structure and cognitive demands of questions found in Grade 5 learners’ English first additional language (FAL) and isiZulu home language (HL) subject workbooks. Using document analysis as the qualitative method, the present study provides an analysis of different comprehension task questions using Bloom’s revised taxonomy of educational objectives (BRT) as a framework for evaluating the standard and existence of a continuum of thinking skills expected of learners from the curriculum. The results show that English and isiZulu language subjects do not follow an equitable assessment order from basic remembering to the highest level category of creating in the categorisation of questions. This implies that English FAL enjoys a more systematic categorisation of questions, allowing learners to answer questions at a lower processing level to a higher cognitively demanding level of question processing. Whereas, in isiZulu HL, the categorisation is mixed from a higher level of question processing to a medium level of processing in a non-systematic manner. It is suggested that curriculum developers harmonise these assessment levels and standards to better scaffold Grade 5 learners’ (average age 10 to 11 years old) ability to answer questions correctly according to their cognitive levels.","PeriodicalId":42604,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of African Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of African Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2023.2248739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis study examines the structure and cognitive demands of questions found in Grade 5 learners’ English first additional language (FAL) and isiZulu home language (HL) subject workbooks. Using document analysis as the qualitative method, the present study provides an analysis of different comprehension task questions using Bloom’s revised taxonomy of educational objectives (BRT) as a framework for evaluating the standard and existence of a continuum of thinking skills expected of learners from the curriculum. The results show that English and isiZulu language subjects do not follow an equitable assessment order from basic remembering to the highest level category of creating in the categorisation of questions. This implies that English FAL enjoys a more systematic categorisation of questions, allowing learners to answer questions at a lower processing level to a higher cognitively demanding level of question processing. Whereas, in isiZulu HL, the categorisation is mixed from a higher level of question processing to a medium level of processing in a non-systematic manner. It is suggested that curriculum developers harmonise these assessment levels and standards to better scaffold Grade 5 learners’ (average age 10 to 11 years old) ability to answer questions correctly according to their cognitive levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非小学多语学习者语言科目评估中的问题分类
摘要本研究考察了五年级学生英语第一附加语言(FAL)和isiZulu母语(HL)科目练习册中问题的结构和认知需求。本研究采用文献分析作为定性方法,对不同的理解任务问题进行了分析,使用布鲁姆修订的教育目标分类法(BRT)作为评估课程对学习者期望的连续思维技能的标准和存在的框架。结果表明,英语和isiZulu语言被试在问题分类中没有遵循从基本记忆到最高级创造的公平评估顺序。这意味着英语FAL有更系统的问题分类,允许学习者从较低的加工水平回答问题到更高的认知要求的问题加工水平。然而,在isiZulu HL中,分类以非系统的方式从较高水平的问题处理混合到中等水平的处理。建议课程开发人员协调这些评估水平和标准,以更好地支撑五年级学生(平均年龄10至11岁)根据他们的认知水平正确回答问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of African Languages is a peer-reviewed research journal devoted to the advancement of African (Bantu) and Khoi-San languages and literatures. Papers, book reviews and polemic contributions of a scientific nature in any of the core areas of linguistics, both theoretical (e.g. syntax, phonology, semantics) and applied (e.g. sociolinguistic topics, language teaching, language policy), and literature, based on original research in the context of the African languages, are welcome. The journal is the official mouthpiece of the African Language Association of Southern Africa (ALASA), established in 1979.
期刊最新文献
An evaluation of PanSALB’s progress in monitoring and managing language rights violations in South Africa Gender assignment in Datooga nouns A discursive construction of self in selected songs by Azeez Fashola (aka Naira Marley) Perceptions about the development of Black South African languages for use in basic education in South Africa Indigenous African language media: practices and processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1