Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications among elderly patients with diabetes – study based on STOPP/START criteria

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacia Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.3897/pharmacia.70.e110386
Petya Milushewa, Kristina Kosanova, Petar Nikolov
{"title":"Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications among elderly patients with diabetes – study based on STOPP/START criteria","authors":"Petya Milushewa, Kristina Kosanova, Petar Nikolov","doi":"10.3897/pharmacia.70.e110386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : The prevalence of drug-related problems in elderly patients is a concerning issue that can lead to elevated morbidity, mortality, and health care resource utilisation. This study focuses on the significance of addressing diabetes in the context of an ageing population, where elderly individuals face higher risks of comorbidities and mortality. The main objective of this study was to assess potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) among patients with diabetes in Bulgaria, using the explicit STOPP/START criteria, version 2. By evaluating the appropriateness of drug prescriptions in this specific patient population, this study aims to shed light on areas that require optimisation to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes. Materials and methods : A national prospective questionnaire study was conducted in Bulgaria among patients aged over 65 years. The research was conducted in 25 randomly selected pharmacies. The study supports the use of the STOPP/START criteria based on the clinical information provided. A total of 133 patients with T1DM or T2DM participated in the study. The evaluation of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) was performed in 131 patients. sStatistical differences in demographics and medication numbers between patients with and without PIMs or PPOs were assessed using a Chi-square test, with a p-value of ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results : The pharmacotherapy of 131 patients with diabetes was assessed, and it was found that 57% of them had polypharmacy. Among the study population, 90 PIMs were identified, indicating that 66% of the patients had inappropriate prescribing. Notably, inappropriate prescribing concerning diabetes was associated with the use of long-acting sulfonylureas (n=10) and beta-blockers (n=13). Applying the START criteria revealed 67 PPOs among 67 patients, representing a prevalence of 50% in the study population. However, no PPOs were detected in the context of diabetes pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, a significant relationship was observed between the number of medications and PIMs, as evidenced by the chi-square test result with a p-value close to zero, indicating statistical significance. Conclusion : The study revealed a high prevalence of PIMs in elderly patients with diabetes in Bulgaria. Endocrine disorders contribute to 26% of PIMs. As Bulgaria’s ageing population faces increasing diabetes challenges, effective management strategies are crucial. These findings underscore the significance of addressing prescribing practises to enhance disease control and prevent complications.","PeriodicalId":20086,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacia","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.70.e110386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective : The prevalence of drug-related problems in elderly patients is a concerning issue that can lead to elevated morbidity, mortality, and health care resource utilisation. This study focuses on the significance of addressing diabetes in the context of an ageing population, where elderly individuals face higher risks of comorbidities and mortality. The main objective of this study was to assess potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) among patients with diabetes in Bulgaria, using the explicit STOPP/START criteria, version 2. By evaluating the appropriateness of drug prescriptions in this specific patient population, this study aims to shed light on areas that require optimisation to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes. Materials and methods : A national prospective questionnaire study was conducted in Bulgaria among patients aged over 65 years. The research was conducted in 25 randomly selected pharmacies. The study supports the use of the STOPP/START criteria based on the clinical information provided. A total of 133 patients with T1DM or T2DM participated in the study. The evaluation of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) was performed in 131 patients. sStatistical differences in demographics and medication numbers between patients with and without PIMs or PPOs were assessed using a Chi-square test, with a p-value of ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results : The pharmacotherapy of 131 patients with diabetes was assessed, and it was found that 57% of them had polypharmacy. Among the study population, 90 PIMs were identified, indicating that 66% of the patients had inappropriate prescribing. Notably, inappropriate prescribing concerning diabetes was associated with the use of long-acting sulfonylureas (n=10) and beta-blockers (n=13). Applying the START criteria revealed 67 PPOs among 67 patients, representing a prevalence of 50% in the study population. However, no PPOs were detected in the context of diabetes pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, a significant relationship was observed between the number of medications and PIMs, as evidenced by the chi-square test result with a p-value close to zero, indicating statistical significance. Conclusion : The study revealed a high prevalence of PIMs in elderly patients with diabetes in Bulgaria. Endocrine disorders contribute to 26% of PIMs. As Bulgaria’s ageing population faces increasing diabetes challenges, effective management strategies are crucial. These findings underscore the significance of addressing prescribing practises to enhance disease control and prevent complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence老年糖尿病患者可能不适当的药物治疗-基于STOPP/START标准的研究
目的:老年患者中药物相关问题的流行是一个令人关注的问题,可导致发病率、死亡率升高和卫生保健资源的利用。本研究的重点是在人口老龄化的背景下解决糖尿病的重要性,老年人面临着更高的合并症和死亡率风险。本研究的主要目的是评估保加利亚糖尿病患者中潜在的不适当药物(PIMs)和潜在的处方遗漏(PPOs),使用明确的STOPP/START标准,版本2。通过评估药物处方在这一特定患者群体中的适当性,本研究旨在阐明需要优化的领域,以提高患者安全性和治疗效果。材料和方法:在保加利亚对65岁以上的患者进行了一项全国前瞻性问卷调查研究。这项研究是在25家随机选择的药店进行的。根据提供的临床信息,本研究支持使用STOPP/START标准。共有133名T1DM或T2DM患者参与了这项研究。对131例患者进行了潜在不适当药物(PIMs)和潜在处方遗漏(PPOs)的评估。采用卡方检验评估有无pim或PPOs患者的人口统计学和用药数量的统计学差异,p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:对131例糖尿病患者的药物治疗进行评估,发现57%的患者有多重用药。在研究人群中,确定了90个pim,表明66%的患者处方不当。值得注意的是,与糖尿病相关的不当处方与长效磺脲类药物(n=10)和β受体阻滞剂(n=13)的使用有关。应用START标准,67例患者中有67例PPOs,在研究人群中患病率为50%。然而,在糖尿病药物治疗的背景下,没有发现PPOs。用药次数与pim之间存在显著关系,卡方检验结果p值接近于零,具有统计学意义。结论:该研究揭示了保加利亚老年糖尿病患者中pim的高患病率。内分泌失调占pim的26%。由于保加利亚的老龄化人口面临越来越多的糖尿病挑战,有效的管理策略至关重要。这些发现强调了解决处方实践以加强疾病控制和预防并发症的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacia
Pharmacia PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
27.30%
发文量
114
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Microneedle and drug delivery across the skin: An overview Nephroprotective effects of Equisetum ramosissimum L. extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats Spectroscopic and thermodynamic characterization of the interaction of a new synthesized antitumor drug candidate 2H4MBBH with human serum albumin Amstirdam coffee ameliorates Lp-PLA2 and the inflammatory response in an atherosclerosis rats A 36-year-old woman with a parathyroid cyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1