From Developing Country Leader to Flexible Negotiator: New Directions in Brazilian Trade Strategy

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 ECONOMICS World Trade Review Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1017/s1474745623000319
Till Schöfer
{"title":"From Developing Country Leader to Flexible Negotiator: New Directions in Brazilian Trade Strategy","authors":"Till Schöfer","doi":"10.1017/s1474745623000319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Brazil has changed its negotiation strategy in World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations. In the first half of the WTO era (1995–), Brazil adopted a strong developing country leadership role as coordinator and spokesperson of the G20 group of developing countries. More recently, however, this group has disappeared from the negotiation scene. This article examines how Brazil has departed from a 2000 status quo and arrived at a more flexible approach, less reliant on the industrialized-developing divide as a structuring principle of its diplomacy. Using WTO negotiation documents, trade delegate interviews, dispute settlement case law, and secondary literature, I outline the contours of new directions in Brazilian trade policy. These include joint legislative initiatives with the EU, a move towards the plurilateral level on non-traditional issues, a greater heterogeneity of dispute settlement targets, and a newly flexible handling of its rights under the WTO's special and differential treatment status. The article contributes to ongoing debates on Brazil's status in international affairs, its reliance on large coalitions, and the maintenance of followership as key directives of its foreign policy, and scholarship that sees Brazil as stuck in a ‘graduation dilemma’.","PeriodicalId":46109,"journal":{"name":"World Trade Review","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Trade Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745623000319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Brazil has changed its negotiation strategy in World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations. In the first half of the WTO era (1995–), Brazil adopted a strong developing country leadership role as coordinator and spokesperson of the G20 group of developing countries. More recently, however, this group has disappeared from the negotiation scene. This article examines how Brazil has departed from a 2000 status quo and arrived at a more flexible approach, less reliant on the industrialized-developing divide as a structuring principle of its diplomacy. Using WTO negotiation documents, trade delegate interviews, dispute settlement case law, and secondary literature, I outline the contours of new directions in Brazilian trade policy. These include joint legislative initiatives with the EU, a move towards the plurilateral level on non-traditional issues, a greater heterogeneity of dispute settlement targets, and a newly flexible handling of its rights under the WTO's special and differential treatment status. The article contributes to ongoing debates on Brazil's status in international affairs, its reliance on large coalitions, and the maintenance of followership as key directives of its foreign policy, and scholarship that sees Brazil as stuck in a ‘graduation dilemma’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从发展中国家领导人到灵活的谈判者:巴西贸易战略的新方向
摘要巴西在世界贸易组织(WTO)谈判中改变了谈判策略。在WTO时代的前半段(1995 -),巴西作为G20发展中国家集团的协调人和发言人,发挥了强大的发展中国家领导作用。然而,最近这个群体已经从谈判舞台上消失了。本文考察了巴西如何从2000年的现状中走出来,采用一种更灵活的方法,减少了对工业化和发展中国家之间的鸿沟作为其外交结构原则的依赖。利用WTO谈判文件、贸易代表访谈、争端解决案例法和二手文献,我概述了巴西贸易政策新方向的轮廓。这些措施包括与欧盟的联合立法倡议,在非传统问题上向诸边水平迈进,争端解决目标的更大异质性,以及在世贸组织特殊和差别待遇地位下对其权利的新的灵活处理。这篇文章有助于对巴西在国际事务中的地位、其对大型联盟的依赖、以及将追随作为其外交政策的关键指示的维持,以及认为巴西陷入“毕业困境”的学者的持续辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Trade Review
World Trade Review Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Alienated Twins – The Overlooked Private Law Dimension of Global Trade and Investment Governance The Demise of Globalization and Rise of Industrial Policy: Caveat Emptor Smart Cities and International Trade Law Norm Entrepreneurship in Digital Trade: The Singapore-led Wave of Digital Trade Agreements Accounting for Carbon Pricing in Third Countries Under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1