Reichardt’s Dye-Based Solvent Polarity and Abraham Solvent Parameters: Examining Correlations and Predictive Modeling

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.3390/liquids3030020
William E. Acree, Andrew S. I. D. Lang
{"title":"Reichardt’s Dye-Based Solvent Polarity and Abraham Solvent Parameters: Examining Correlations and Predictive Modeling","authors":"William E. Acree, Andrew S. I. D. Lang","doi":"10.3390/liquids3030020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “solvent polarity” is widely used to explain the effects of using different solvents in various scientific applications. However, a consensus regarding its definition and quantitative measure is still lacking, hindering progress in solvent-based research. This study hopes to add to the conversation by presenting the development of two linear regression models for solvent polarity, based on Reichardt’s ET(30) solvent polarity scale, using Abraham solvent parameters and a transformer-based model for predicting solvent polarity directly from molecular structure. The first linear model incorporates the standard Abraham solvent descriptors s, a, b, and the extended model ionic descriptors j+ and j−, achieving impressive test-set statistics of R2 = 0.940 (coefficient of determination), MAE = 0.037 (mean absolute error), and RMSE = 0.050 (Root-Mean-Square Error). The second model, covering a more extensive chemical space but only using the descriptors s, a, and b, achieves test-set statistics of R2 = 0.842, MAE = 0.085, and RMSE = 0.104. The transformer-based model, applicable to any solvent with an associated SMILES string, achieves test-set statistics of R2 = 0.824, MAE = 0.066, and RMSE = 0.095. Our findings highlight the significance of Abraham solvent parameters, especially the dipolarity/polarizability, hydrogen-bond acidity/basicity, and ionic descriptors, in predicting solvent polarity. These models offer valuable insights for researchers interested in Reichardt’s ET(30) solvent polarity parameter and solvent polarity in general.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/liquids3030020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The concept of “solvent polarity” is widely used to explain the effects of using different solvents in various scientific applications. However, a consensus regarding its definition and quantitative measure is still lacking, hindering progress in solvent-based research. This study hopes to add to the conversation by presenting the development of two linear regression models for solvent polarity, based on Reichardt’s ET(30) solvent polarity scale, using Abraham solvent parameters and a transformer-based model for predicting solvent polarity directly from molecular structure. The first linear model incorporates the standard Abraham solvent descriptors s, a, b, and the extended model ionic descriptors j+ and j−, achieving impressive test-set statistics of R2 = 0.940 (coefficient of determination), MAE = 0.037 (mean absolute error), and RMSE = 0.050 (Root-Mean-Square Error). The second model, covering a more extensive chemical space but only using the descriptors s, a, and b, achieves test-set statistics of R2 = 0.842, MAE = 0.085, and RMSE = 0.104. The transformer-based model, applicable to any solvent with an associated SMILES string, achieves test-set statistics of R2 = 0.824, MAE = 0.066, and RMSE = 0.095. Our findings highlight the significance of Abraham solvent parameters, especially the dipolarity/polarizability, hydrogen-bond acidity/basicity, and ionic descriptors, in predicting solvent polarity. These models offer valuable insights for researchers interested in Reichardt’s ET(30) solvent polarity parameter and solvent polarity in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赖克哈特染料溶剂极性和亚伯拉罕溶剂参数:检验相关性和预测建模
在各种科学应用中,“溶剂极性”的概念被广泛用于解释使用不同溶剂的影响。然而,对其定义和定量测量仍缺乏共识,阻碍了溶剂型研究的进展。本研究希望通过介绍溶剂极性的两种线性回归模型的发展来增加对话,基于Reichardt的ET(30)溶剂极性量表,使用Abraham溶剂参数和基于变压器的模型,直接从分子结构预测溶剂极性。第一个线性模型结合了标准Abraham溶剂描述符s、a、b和扩展模型离子描述符j+和j−,获得了令人印象深刻的测试集统计量R2 = 0.940(决定系数),MAE = 0.037(平均绝对误差),RMSE = 0.050(均方根误差)。第二个模型覆盖了更广泛的化学空间,但只使用了描述符s, a和b,得到了R2 = 0.842, MAE = 0.085, RMSE = 0.104的测试集统计量。基于变压器的模型适用于任何具有相关SMILES字符串的溶剂,其测试集统计量为R2 = 0.824, MAE = 0.066, RMSE = 0.095。我们的发现强调了亚伯拉罕溶剂参数,特别是双极性/极化性、氢键酸度/碱度和离子描述符在预测溶剂极性方面的重要性。这些模型为对Reichardt的ET(30)溶剂极性参数和溶剂极性一般感兴趣的研究人员提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1