Major new developments affecting treatment and prognosis in hypertension.

R S Gubner
{"title":"Major new developments affecting treatment and prognosis in hypertension.","authors":"R S Gubner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Joint studies of the ALIMDA and Society of Actuaries, notably those of 1935, 1959 and 1979, established that there is a progressive rise in cardiovascular mortality with successive increments in blood pressure. This has provided the basis of underwriting. The converse is not true, or at least has not been true until very recently. Drugs that effectively reduce blood pressure have been available for several decades, but reduction and maintenance of blood pressure is still accomplished in only a minority of hypertensives. Long-term trials employing a combination of drugs, i.e., diuretics, vasodilators and reserpine and subsequently beta-blockers, almost without fail have not shown that treatment with these agents significantly reduces heart disease mortality and sudden death. This has been attributed, perhaps without basis, to an unfavorable countering effect of increased lipid levels, aggravating this risk factor, and other undesirable metabolic effect of diuretics, such as hypokalemia and depletion of body magnesium, increasing the propensity to ventricular arrhythmias, hyperglycemia, worsening diabetes, and hyperuricemia. A survey of 674 persons with hypertension seen personally during the period 1985-89, who were under the care of approximately that many physicians, reveals striking changes in drug prescription and use during this brief period that portend a major change in the outlook of hypertension. Two classes of drugs have increased rapidly in popularity: these are the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) and the calcium blockers. Both classes of drugs effectively lower blood pressure and have minimal side effects with good compliance. They act not only to reduce peripheral vascular resistance, but also locally in the heart muscle to directly cause left ventricular hypertrophy to regress, an effect of great consequence. The drugs used in former trials such as the vasodilators and diuretics have no effect on left ventricular hypertrophy, unlike the ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists. Left ventricular hypertrophy is the key lesion in hypertension and is only in part due to increased work load imposed by elevated pressure. It is associated with elevated blood pressure, but not closely and occurs independently; ventricular myocytes as well as myocytes of the vasculature being stimulated to growth by angiotensin and calcium, potentiating the effect of norepinephrine. Left ventricular hypertrophy greatly increases the propensity to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death, and is a prime cause of cardiac mortality and sudden death not only in hypertension, but also in obesity, aging and diabetes, in which conditions left ventricular hypertrophy also is very common.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76754,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America","volume":"73 ","pages":"97-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Joint studies of the ALIMDA and Society of Actuaries, notably those of 1935, 1959 and 1979, established that there is a progressive rise in cardiovascular mortality with successive increments in blood pressure. This has provided the basis of underwriting. The converse is not true, or at least has not been true until very recently. Drugs that effectively reduce blood pressure have been available for several decades, but reduction and maintenance of blood pressure is still accomplished in only a minority of hypertensives. Long-term trials employing a combination of drugs, i.e., diuretics, vasodilators and reserpine and subsequently beta-blockers, almost without fail have not shown that treatment with these agents significantly reduces heart disease mortality and sudden death. This has been attributed, perhaps without basis, to an unfavorable countering effect of increased lipid levels, aggravating this risk factor, and other undesirable metabolic effect of diuretics, such as hypokalemia and depletion of body magnesium, increasing the propensity to ventricular arrhythmias, hyperglycemia, worsening diabetes, and hyperuricemia. A survey of 674 persons with hypertension seen personally during the period 1985-89, who were under the care of approximately that many physicians, reveals striking changes in drug prescription and use during this brief period that portend a major change in the outlook of hypertension. Two classes of drugs have increased rapidly in popularity: these are the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) and the calcium blockers. Both classes of drugs effectively lower blood pressure and have minimal side effects with good compliance. They act not only to reduce peripheral vascular resistance, but also locally in the heart muscle to directly cause left ventricular hypertrophy to regress, an effect of great consequence. The drugs used in former trials such as the vasodilators and diuretics have no effect on left ventricular hypertrophy, unlike the ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists. Left ventricular hypertrophy is the key lesion in hypertension and is only in part due to increased work load imposed by elevated pressure. It is associated with elevated blood pressure, but not closely and occurs independently; ventricular myocytes as well as myocytes of the vasculature being stimulated to growth by angiotensin and calcium, potentiating the effect of norepinephrine. Left ventricular hypertrophy greatly increases the propensity to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death, and is a prime cause of cardiac mortality and sudden death not only in hypertension, but also in obesity, aging and diabetes, in which conditions left ventricular hypertrophy also is very common.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响高血压治疗和预后的主要新进展。
ALIMDA和精算师协会的联合研究,特别是1935年、1959年和1979年的研究证实,随着血压的持续升高,心血管疾病死亡率逐渐上升。这为承保提供了基础。反之则不成立,或者至少直到最近才成立。有效降低血压的药物已经出现了几十年,但仍然只有少数高血压患者能够降低和维持血压。长期试验采用药物组合,即利尿剂、血管扩张剂、利血平和随后的-受体阻滞剂,几乎无一例外地表明,用这些药物治疗可显著降低心脏病死亡率和猝死。可能没有根据的是,这归因于脂质水平升高的不利对抗作用,加剧了这一危险因素,以及利尿剂的其他不良代谢作用,如低钾血症和体内镁的消耗,增加室性心律失常、高血糖、加重糖尿病和高尿酸血症的倾向。一项对1985- 1989年期间674名高血压患者的调查显示,在这段短暂的时间内,药物处方和使用发生了惊人的变化,预示着高血压的前景发生了重大变化。有两类药物越来越受欢迎:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE抑制剂)和钙阻滞剂。这两类药物都能有效降低血压,副作用最小,依从性好。它们不仅可以降低周围血管阻力,还可以局部作用于心肌,直接导致左心室肥厚的消退,这是一个非常严重的后果。与ACE抑制剂和钙拮抗剂不同,先前试验中使用的药物如血管扩张剂和利尿剂对左心室肥厚没有影响。左心室肥厚是高血压的主要病变,其部分原因是压力升高造成的工作量增加。它与血压升高有关,但不是密切相关,而是独立发生的;心室肌细胞和血管肌细胞被血管紧张素和钙刺激生长,增强去甲肾上腺素的作用。左心室肥厚大大增加室性心律失常和猝死的倾向,不仅在高血压中,而且在肥胖、衰老和糖尿病中也是心脏死亡和猝死的主要原因,在这些疾病中左心室肥厚也很常见。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient: Peptic ulcer disease Coronary artery disease. Rehabilitation and insurance relationships. Health access America: the growing ferment. The status and treatment of rheumatic disease and its impact on mortality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1