HOUSE ARREST AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PRISON SENTENCE IN MODERN GEORGIAN LAW (Evolution and Transformation)

{"title":"HOUSE ARREST AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PRISON SENTENCE IN MODERN GEORGIAN LAW (Evolution and Transformation)","authors":"","doi":"10.36475/9.3.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is about house arrest, one of the types of non-custodial punishment in modern Georgian law, where the legal problems of using this benefit, provided by the law, are discussed, which is based on a deep analysis of practice and research of a number of scientific works. The importance of the topic was determined by the unfavorable state of the domestic legislation, the existence of a non-homogenous practice on the part of the court in relation to the “revision” of the decisions made by the local councils of the special penitentiary service, the incalculability of statistical data, as well as the great practical importance of the said topic in the process of both law-making and law enforcement, due to the paucity of modern Georgian legal literature regarding this concept. The aim of this article is to clarify the legal nature and the extent of house arrest, not only on the example of Georgia, but also on the example of some foreign countries, which will make the process of scientific research of the legal problems, of replacing the remaining sentence with house arrest, even more interesting and diverse. In addition, the article also aims to analyze the errors made in the applied practice and to develop scientifically based recommendations to eliminate the gaps in the rules regulating house arrest. The results of the theoretical/empirical research allow legal analysis to be made on the introduction/establishment of non-custodial punishment, which was previously unfamiliar to our country; to what extent the aforementioned legislative innovation was justified and what can be done for its further refinement/perfection, which is ultimately aimed to prohibit the usage of non-homogenous practice, regarding the use of the mentioned legal mechanism, on the part of both the decision-making body and the court. Historical, formal-logical, dogmatic, formal-legal, comparative-legal, descriptive and systematic methods were used to study the problem, posed in a separate chapter of the article. Furthermore, the data of legal statistics was used to study and generalize the practice of local councils, as well as the court, and the final part is devoted to the conclusive decrees obtained as a result of the study and scientific processing of the raised issues.","PeriodicalId":52638,"journal":{"name":"samart`ali da msop`lio","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"samart`ali da msop`lio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36475/9.3.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is about house arrest, one of the types of non-custodial punishment in modern Georgian law, where the legal problems of using this benefit, provided by the law, are discussed, which is based on a deep analysis of practice and research of a number of scientific works. The importance of the topic was determined by the unfavorable state of the domestic legislation, the existence of a non-homogenous practice on the part of the court in relation to the “revision” of the decisions made by the local councils of the special penitentiary service, the incalculability of statistical data, as well as the great practical importance of the said topic in the process of both law-making and law enforcement, due to the paucity of modern Georgian legal literature regarding this concept. The aim of this article is to clarify the legal nature and the extent of house arrest, not only on the example of Georgia, but also on the example of some foreign countries, which will make the process of scientific research of the legal problems, of replacing the remaining sentence with house arrest, even more interesting and diverse. In addition, the article also aims to analyze the errors made in the applied practice and to develop scientifically based recommendations to eliminate the gaps in the rules regulating house arrest. The results of the theoretical/empirical research allow legal analysis to be made on the introduction/establishment of non-custodial punishment, which was previously unfamiliar to our country; to what extent the aforementioned legislative innovation was justified and what can be done for its further refinement/perfection, which is ultimately aimed to prohibit the usage of non-homogenous practice, regarding the use of the mentioned legal mechanism, on the part of both the decision-making body and the court. Historical, formal-logical, dogmatic, formal-legal, comparative-legal, descriptive and systematic methods were used to study the problem, posed in a separate chapter of the article. Furthermore, the data of legal statistics was used to study and generalize the practice of local councils, as well as the court, and the final part is devoted to the conclusive decrees obtained as a result of the study and scientific processing of the raised issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代格鲁吉亚法律中的软禁替代监禁(演变与转变)
本文在对一些科学著作的实践和研究进行深入分析的基础上,对格鲁吉亚现代法律中的一种非监禁性刑罚软禁进行了探讨,探讨了法律规定的这种权利的法律问题。这一专题的重要性是由以下因素决定的:国内立法的不利状况、法院在“修订”特别监狱服务地方委员会所作决定方面的不一致做法、统计数据的不可计算性以及上述专题在立法和执法过程中具有重大的实际重要性。由于缺乏关于这一概念的现代格鲁吉亚法律文献。本文的目的是澄清软禁的法律性质和范围,不仅以格鲁吉亚为例,而且以国外一些国家为例,这将使以软禁代替剩余刑期的法律问题的科学研究过程更加有趣和多样化。此外,本文还旨在分析在应用实践中出现的错误,并提出科学的建议,以消除软禁规则的空白。通过理论/实证研究的结果,可以对我国以前不熟悉的非监禁刑罚的引入/确立进行法律分析;上述立法创新在多大程度上是合理的,可以做些什么来进一步改进/完善,其最终目的是禁止决策机构和法院在使用上述法律机制方面使用非同质做法。本文用历史的、形式逻辑的、教条的、形式法律的、比较法律的、描述的和系统的方法来研究这个问题,并在文章的单独一章中提出。此外,法律统计数据被用于研究和概括地方议会以及法院的实践,最后一部分专门用于研究和科学处理所提出问题而获得的结论性法令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
DETERMINATION OF INDIVIDUALS’ FREEDOM RANGE RELYING ON THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HARM PRINCIPLE IN WESTERN AND ISLAMIC LEGAL SYSTEMS FIELD OF APPLICATION OF ALGERIAN COMPETITION LAW TO INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTS (Model Trade Concession Contract) CONSUMER RIGHTS CONCEPT AND HISTORICAL REVIEW THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM IN GEORGIA (In terms of a mixed system of enforcement and protection of basic rights of persons participating in theenforcement proceedings) INVESTIGATING POLITICAL SECURITY AS A SUBSET OF HUMAN SECURITY WITH A FOCUS ON URBANIZATION IN HUMAN RIGHTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1