The Impact of Emotion Regulation Improvements on Intolerance of Uncertainty During Emotion Regulation Therapy

Michal Clayton, Megan Renna, Leah Weingast, Aliza Panjwani, Phillip Spaeth, Richard Heimberg, David Fresco, Douglas Mennin
{"title":"The Impact of Emotion Regulation Improvements on Intolerance of Uncertainty During Emotion Regulation Therapy","authors":"Michal Clayton, Megan Renna, Leah Weingast, Aliza Panjwani, Phillip Spaeth, Richard Heimberg, David Fresco, Douglas Mennin","doi":"10.55913/joep.v1i1.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and impoverished emotion regulation repertoires characterize generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Across two treatment studies, we explored relationships between two emotion regulation skills, decentering and reappraisal, and IU during emotion regulation therapy (ERT). Participants were treatment-seeking individuals diagnosed with GAD. Study 1 included data from two open trials of ERT (N = 52), and Study 2 examined data from a randomized controlled trial of ERT (n = 28) versus a minimal attention control (n = 25). IU and emotion regulation skills were measured at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment. Mediation models explored indirect effects of emotion regulation skills on the relationship between time (Study 1) or group (Study 2) and intolerance of uncertainty. Results demonstrated improvements in emotion regulation skills and reductions in IU during ERT. Greater use of reappraisal and decentering was associated with reduced IU over time. Tests of indirect effects suggested that observed between-group differences in IU can be explained by changes in emotion regulation skills. The findings from these studies highlight the utility of non-IU-specific interventions to help individuals tolerate uncertainty. Exploring the impact of emotion regulation skills on IU could lead to improvements in treating GAD.","PeriodicalId":73729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emotion and psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55913/joep.v1i1.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and impoverished emotion regulation repertoires characterize generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Across two treatment studies, we explored relationships between two emotion regulation skills, decentering and reappraisal, and IU during emotion regulation therapy (ERT). Participants were treatment-seeking individuals diagnosed with GAD. Study 1 included data from two open trials of ERT (N = 52), and Study 2 examined data from a randomized controlled trial of ERT (n = 28) versus a minimal attention control (n = 25). IU and emotion regulation skills were measured at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment. Mediation models explored indirect effects of emotion regulation skills on the relationship between time (Study 1) or group (Study 2) and intolerance of uncertainty. Results demonstrated improvements in emotion regulation skills and reductions in IU during ERT. Greater use of reappraisal and decentering was associated with reduced IU over time. Tests of indirect effects suggested that observed between-group differences in IU can be explained by changes in emotion regulation skills. The findings from these studies highlight the utility of non-IU-specific interventions to help individuals tolerate uncertainty. Exploring the impact of emotion regulation skills on IU could lead to improvements in treating GAD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪调节改善对情绪调节治疗中不确定耐受性的影响
不确定性不耐受(IU)和情绪调节能力低下是广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的特征。在两项治疗研究中,我们探讨了情绪调节治疗(ERT)期间两种情绪调节技能(去中心化和重新评估)与IU之间的关系。参与者是被诊断为广泛性焦虑症的寻求治疗的个体。研究1纳入了两项ERT开放试验(N = 52)的数据,研究2检查了ERT随机对照试验(N = 28)与最小注意控制(N = 25)的数据。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后分别测量IU和情绪调节技能。中介模型探讨了情绪调节技能对时间(研究1)或群体(研究2)与不确定性不耐受之间关系的间接影响。结果表明,在ERT期间情绪调节技能得到改善,IU减少。随着时间的推移,更多地使用重新评估和去中心化与IU降低有关。间接效应测试表明,观察到的组间IU差异可以用情绪调节技能的变化来解释。这些研究的结果强调了非u特异性干预措施在帮助个体容忍不确定性方面的效用。探索情绪调节技能对IU的影响可能会改善广泛性焦虑症的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Interpersonal Emotion Regulation for People with Heightened Emotions: An Examination in People with Bipolar Disorder and Those with High Aggression Beyond Main Effects? Affect Level as a Moderator in the Relation Between Affect Dynamics and Depressive Symptoms Depressive Symptoms and Binge Eating in Children: Examining Symptom Specificity in a Population-based Sample of Male and Female Children Impact of Psychological Stress on Emotion Regulation Strategies during COVID-19 in Young Adults with Self-Reported Social Anxiety The Role of Emotion Dysregulation in Problematic Exercise in those with Eating Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1