Returns of sustainable land management interventions: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia

IF 2.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Environment Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI:10.1080/27658511.2023.2280315
Tasew Tadesse
{"title":"Returns of sustainable land management interventions: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Tasew Tadesse","doi":"10.1080/27658511.2023.2280315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethiopia has been implementing sustainable land management (SLM) measures throughout the country to reverse land degradation. Despite the implementation of various SLM measures in Ethiopia, very little is known about whether these measures are effective from adopting farmers’ perspectives. This study examines the costs, benefits, and returns of SLM practices implemented in the Barcha-Adado watershed in Southern Ethiopia. Data for the analysis were obtained primarily from a survey of 231 barley-growing farmers. Using a cost-benefit analytical framework, the returns of SLM practices were evaluated using the net present value (NPV) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) over the period 2019 to 2046. The major SLM measures implemented by farmers are soil bunds, fanyajuu bunds, and fanyajuu bunds stabilized with grass strips. The average establishment cost of SLM measures was $171 per hectare. On a per-hectare basis, farmers who implemented SLM practices experienced a 28% higher crop yield and an NPV of $1,491.6 compared to non-adopting farmers. The BCR of SLM practices is 5.16, implying that the present value of the benefits is more than five times higher than the present value of the costs of investment in SLM measures. Returns are the highest for fanyajuu bunds and the least for fanyajuu bunds stabilized with grass strips. Study findings suggest that SLM interventions significantly enhance crop productivity and generate considerable financial returns for adopting farmers. The findings would serve as evidence for the local decision-makers and may provide incentives to scale up the benefits of SLM practices to degraded farmlands in the country.","PeriodicalId":29858,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment","volume":"26 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2023.2280315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethiopia has been implementing sustainable land management (SLM) measures throughout the country to reverse land degradation. Despite the implementation of various SLM measures in Ethiopia, very little is known about whether these measures are effective from adopting farmers’ perspectives. This study examines the costs, benefits, and returns of SLM practices implemented in the Barcha-Adado watershed in Southern Ethiopia. Data for the analysis were obtained primarily from a survey of 231 barley-growing farmers. Using a cost-benefit analytical framework, the returns of SLM practices were evaluated using the net present value (NPV) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) over the period 2019 to 2046. The major SLM measures implemented by farmers are soil bunds, fanyajuu bunds, and fanyajuu bunds stabilized with grass strips. The average establishment cost of SLM measures was $171 per hectare. On a per-hectare basis, farmers who implemented SLM practices experienced a 28% higher crop yield and an NPV of $1,491.6 compared to non-adopting farmers. The BCR of SLM practices is 5.16, implying that the present value of the benefits is more than five times higher than the present value of the costs of investment in SLM measures. Returns are the highest for fanyajuu bunds and the least for fanyajuu bunds stabilized with grass strips. Study findings suggest that SLM interventions significantly enhance crop productivity and generate considerable financial returns for adopting farmers. The findings would serve as evidence for the local decision-makers and may provide incentives to scale up the benefits of SLM practices to degraded farmlands in the country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续土地管理干预措施的回报:来自埃塞俄比亚南部的证据
埃塞俄比亚一直在全国实施可持续土地管理措施,以扭转土地退化。尽管埃塞俄比亚实施了各种土地管理措施,但从农民的角度来看,人们对这些措施是否有效知之甚少。本研究考察了埃塞俄比亚南部Barcha-Adado流域实施SLM实践的成本、收益和回报。用于分析的数据主要来自对231名种植大麦的农民的调查。使用成本效益分析框架,使用2019年至2046年期间的净现值(NPV)和效益成本比(BCR)评估了SLM实践的回报。农民实施的主要土地管理措施是土壤带、草堆带和草带稳定的草堆带。土地管理措施的平均建立费用为每公顷171美元。以每公顷为基础,与未采用SLM的农民相比,实施SLM的农民的作物产量高出28%,净现值为1,491.6美元。SLM实践的BCR是5.16,这意味着收益的现值比SLM措施中投资成本的现值高出5倍以上。其中,以草带稳定的债券回报率最高,以草带稳定的债券回报率最低。研究结果表明,SLM干预措施可显著提高作物生产力,并为采用该措施的农民带来可观的经济回报。这些发现将为当地决策者提供证据,并可能提供激励措施,将SLM做法的效益扩大到该国退化的农田。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Environment
Sustainable Environment ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Exploring loss and damage from climate change and global perspectives that influence response mechanism in vulnerable communities Exploring knowledge, attitudes and practices of farmers at the edge of Budongo forest on agrochemicals usage Pesticides in use, their application and risks on human health and ecosystems: A case of Fogera District, Ethiopia Hidden hazards in urban soils: A meta-analysis review of global heavy metal contamination (2010-2022), sources and its Ecological and health consequences Do innovation, financial development and institutional quality matter in managing carbon risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1