The Republic of Korea in the Geopolitical dimensions of the Russian-Ukrainian War: Official Political Discourse

Q4 Arts and Humanities Shidnij Svit Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.15407/orientw2023.03.091
Iryna Dudko, Inna Pohorielova
{"title":"The Republic of Korea in the Geopolitical dimensions of the Russian-Ukrainian War: Official Political Discourse","authors":"Iryna Dudko, Inna Pohorielova","doi":"10.15407/orientw2023.03.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the analysis of political discourse and positions of South Korean society the geopolitical orientations of the Republic of Korea in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war are analyzed. It is proved that the events in Ukraine are directly related the Indo-Pacific region, including the Republic of Korea. The Russian-Ukrainian war affected changes in the configuration of forces in the region, in particular, strengthened the partnership of North Korea, China and Russia and caused opposition, and as a result, further strengthening of cooperation between the Republic of Korea, the United States and Japan. It is emphasized that, in contrast to the North Korean regime, which supported Russia’s invasion to Ukraine, South Korea, despite the initial uncertainty and fluctuations in the choice of geopolitical guidelines, sided its American ally in defending Ukraine. The factors of influence upon the formation of the Ukrainian direction of the policy of the Republic of Korea are considered. These are, on the one hand, allied relations and obligations of the Republic of Korea towards the United States, belonging to the collective West, public opinion in the Republic of Korea, which has taken an anti-Russian position. At the same time, the Korean government sought to take into account interests in the field of maintaining stability in the economic sphere, as well as existing threats from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and China, which determined the tendency to maintain a balance of relations with Russia in order to minimize security and economic risks. Although during 2022 the Republic of Korea provided financial and humanitarian support to Ukraine with a tendency of its growth for the future, and also perceived the possibility of indirect support for Ukraine with weapons, the current administrations refused to provide direct military assistance to Kyiv, as other democracies do. It is noted regarding analysis of the main evaluative approaches of representatives of Korean, American and Ukrainian politicians, as well as experts on foreign policy of the Republic of Korea that the complexity and ambiguity of Seoul’s geopolitical orientations under the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war reflects the general complexity of relations between the countries of East Asia. It is the situation, when the withdrawal of a player outside the “rules of the game” defined before the start of the war (this time the Republic of Korea) can lead to a sharp deterioration in the security situation with the division of the countries of the region into two openly confrontational camps. Stabilization position in this regard with the strengthening of the role of the Republic of Korea in supporting Ukraine can be played by the United States, which, relying on other democratic countries, as well as under conditions of deepening strategic partnership with the Republic of Korea, is able to deter negative security challenges from both the DPRK and China. It is argued that the strengthening of assistance to Ukraine by the Republic of Korea is also associated with the deepening of a comprehensive partnership between Ukraine and South Korea as a factor that will serve the stabilization processes on both the European and Asian continents.","PeriodicalId":36037,"journal":{"name":"Shidnij Svit","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shidnij Svit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2023.03.091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the analysis of political discourse and positions of South Korean society the geopolitical orientations of the Republic of Korea in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war are analyzed. It is proved that the events in Ukraine are directly related the Indo-Pacific region, including the Republic of Korea. The Russian-Ukrainian war affected changes in the configuration of forces in the region, in particular, strengthened the partnership of North Korea, China and Russia and caused opposition, and as a result, further strengthening of cooperation between the Republic of Korea, the United States and Japan. It is emphasized that, in contrast to the North Korean regime, which supported Russia’s invasion to Ukraine, South Korea, despite the initial uncertainty and fluctuations in the choice of geopolitical guidelines, sided its American ally in defending Ukraine. The factors of influence upon the formation of the Ukrainian direction of the policy of the Republic of Korea are considered. These are, on the one hand, allied relations and obligations of the Republic of Korea towards the United States, belonging to the collective West, public opinion in the Republic of Korea, which has taken an anti-Russian position. At the same time, the Korean government sought to take into account interests in the field of maintaining stability in the economic sphere, as well as existing threats from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and China, which determined the tendency to maintain a balance of relations with Russia in order to minimize security and economic risks. Although during 2022 the Republic of Korea provided financial and humanitarian support to Ukraine with a tendency of its growth for the future, and also perceived the possibility of indirect support for Ukraine with weapons, the current administrations refused to provide direct military assistance to Kyiv, as other democracies do. It is noted regarding analysis of the main evaluative approaches of representatives of Korean, American and Ukrainian politicians, as well as experts on foreign policy of the Republic of Korea that the complexity and ambiguity of Seoul’s geopolitical orientations under the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war reflects the general complexity of relations between the countries of East Asia. It is the situation, when the withdrawal of a player outside the “rules of the game” defined before the start of the war (this time the Republic of Korea) can lead to a sharp deterioration in the security situation with the division of the countries of the region into two openly confrontational camps. Stabilization position in this regard with the strengthening of the role of the Republic of Korea in supporting Ukraine can be played by the United States, which, relying on other democratic countries, as well as under conditions of deepening strategic partnership with the Republic of Korea, is able to deter negative security challenges from both the DPRK and China. It is argued that the strengthening of assistance to Ukraine by the Republic of Korea is also associated with the deepening of a comprehensive partnership between Ukraine and South Korea as a factor that will serve the stabilization processes on both the European and Asian continents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国在俄罗斯-乌克兰战争的地缘政治维度:官方政治话语
通过对韩国社会政治话语和立场的分析,分析了俄乌战争背景下韩国的地缘政治取向。事实证明,乌克兰事件与包括韩国在内的印太地区有直接关系。俄乌战争影响了该地区力量配置的变化,特别是加强了朝鲜、中国和俄罗斯的伙伴关系,并引起了反对,从而进一步加强了大韩民国、美国和日本之间的合作。有人强调,与支持俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的北韩政权不同,韩国虽然在地缘政治方针的选择上存在不确定性和波动,但在乌克兰的防御上站在了盟友美国一边。本文审议了影响大韩民国政策的乌克兰方向形成的因素。这些问题一方面是属于西方集体的大韩民国对美国的盟国关系和义务,一方面是采取反俄立场的大韩民国的舆论。与此同时,韩国政府试图考虑到维持经济领域稳定的利益,以及来自朝鲜民主主义人民共和国和中国的现有威胁,这决定了韩国倾向于保持与俄罗斯关系的平衡,以尽量减少安全和经济风险。尽管在2022年期间,韩国向乌克兰提供了经济和人道主义支持,并认为有可能间接向乌克兰提供武器支持,但现任政府拒绝像其他民主国家那样向基辅提供直接军事援助。在分析韩国、美国和乌克兰政治家代表以及韩国外交政策专家的主要评价方法时,值得注意的是,在俄乌战争条件下,首尔地缘政治取向的复杂性和模糊性反映了东亚国家之间关系的总体复杂性。在这种情况下,退出战争开始前确定的“游戏规则”之外的一个参与者(这次是大韩民国)可能导致安全局势急剧恶化,使该地区的国家分裂为两个公开对抗的阵营。随着大韩民国在支持乌克兰方面的作用的加强,美国在这方面的稳定地位可以发挥作用,美国依靠其他民主国家,并在与大韩民国深化战略伙伴关系的条件下,能够阻止来自朝鲜和中国的负面安全挑战。有人认为,大韩民国加强对乌克兰的援助也与深化乌克兰和南朝鲜之间的全面伙伴关系有关,这是一个有助于欧洲和亚洲大陆稳定进程的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shidnij Svit
Shidnij Svit Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Queering/Querying the Nation: Interrogating Alternative Mythography in Devdutt Pattanaik’s Shikhandi The Phenomenon of the Liberal Party (Jiyū-tō) in the Political System of Japan: The Political Brand Evolution and Its Ideological Content Fragment of the Amenhaiu Coffin from the Collection of the Odesa Archaeological Museum of the NAS of Ukraine (Inv. No. 52611) By the Ways of Academician Ahatanhel Krymsky: Cooperation of the Volyn Museum of Local History and Volodymyr Khomenko in the Matter of Preserving the Legacy of the Scientist A Comparative Corpus Analysis of the Russian-Ukrainian War Coverage in Eastern and Western English Language News Releases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1