Enablers of transdisciplinary collaboration for researchers working on climate risks in African cities

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainability Science Pub Date : 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s11625-023-01426-w
Alice McClure
{"title":"Enablers of transdisciplinary collaboration for researchers working on climate risks in African cities","authors":"Alice McClure","doi":"10.1007/s11625-023-01426-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explores enablers that help researchers to undertake collaborative transdisciplinary work with non-academic actors to co-produce knowledge on complex climate risks in African cities. Enablers were explored using a qualitative case study approach and expansive learning theory, which emphasises the embeddedness of practices in cultural and historical contexts. Concepts associated with expansive learning helped to consider relational enablers, namely: (i) capabilities required by researchers to understand the perspectives, values and motives of non-academic actors and make their own explicit; (ii) characteristics of spaces that allowed diverse participants to engage with perspectives, values and motives of others; and (iii) knowledge of the motivation behind different practices of non-academic actors, as embedded in different contexts. Findings highlight the importance of researchers’ intentional efforts to engage non-academic actors in their city contexts and respond to local priorities. Design elements that enabled relational work included explicit co-production framings, sharing experiences and opportunities for understanding various actor groups through structured activities and informal dialogues. The study highlights the situated and dialectical relationship between growing relational capabilities of researchers and their engagement in transdisciplinarity, provided spaces were created for reflection on activities. Relational enablers helped researchers to understand the heterogeneous experiences of actors working in African cities and tensions that influence their practices including traditional knowledge paradigms and siloed ways of working. The “champions” identified by researchers were those non-academic actors who took agency to engage with these tensions and begin transforming their practices towards multi-actor transdisciplinary knowledge co-production.","PeriodicalId":49457,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01426-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study explores enablers that help researchers to undertake collaborative transdisciplinary work with non-academic actors to co-produce knowledge on complex climate risks in African cities. Enablers were explored using a qualitative case study approach and expansive learning theory, which emphasises the embeddedness of practices in cultural and historical contexts. Concepts associated with expansive learning helped to consider relational enablers, namely: (i) capabilities required by researchers to understand the perspectives, values and motives of non-academic actors and make their own explicit; (ii) characteristics of spaces that allowed diverse participants to engage with perspectives, values and motives of others; and (iii) knowledge of the motivation behind different practices of non-academic actors, as embedded in different contexts. Findings highlight the importance of researchers’ intentional efforts to engage non-academic actors in their city contexts and respond to local priorities. Design elements that enabled relational work included explicit co-production framings, sharing experiences and opportunities for understanding various actor groups through structured activities and informal dialogues. The study highlights the situated and dialectical relationship between growing relational capabilities of researchers and their engagement in transdisciplinarity, provided spaces were created for reflection on activities. Relational enablers helped researchers to understand the heterogeneous experiences of actors working in African cities and tensions that influence their practices including traditional knowledge paradigms and siloed ways of working. The “champions” identified by researchers were those non-academic actors who took agency to engage with these tensions and begin transforming their practices towards multi-actor transdisciplinary knowledge co-production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进非洲城市气候风险研究人员的跨学科合作
本研究探讨了帮助研究人员与非学术行为者开展跨学科合作,共同产生非洲城市复杂气候风险知识的推动因素。我们使用定性案例研究方法和扩展学习理论来探索促进因素,该理论强调实践在文化和历史背景中的嵌入性。与扩张性学习相关的概念有助于考虑关系促成因素,即:(i)研究人员理解非学术行为者的观点、价值观和动机并明确自己的观点、价值观和动机所需的能力;(ii)允许不同参与者参与他人观点、价值观和动机的空间特征;(iii)了解不同背景下非学术行为者不同实践背后的动机。研究结果强调了研究人员有意识地努力让非学术行为者参与到他们的城市环境中,并对当地的优先事项做出反应的重要性。使关系工作成为可能的设计元素包括明确的合作制作框架、分享经验以及通过结构化活动和非正式对话了解不同演员群体的机会。该研究强调了研究人员不断增长的关系能力与他们参与跨学科之间的位置和辩证关系,提供了反思活动的空间。关系促成因素帮助研究人员了解在非洲城市工作的行动者的不同经历,以及影响其实践的紧张局势,包括传统知识范式和孤立的工作方式。研究人员确定的“冠军”是那些非学术参与者,他们主动参与这些紧张局势,并开始将他们的实践转变为多参与者跨学科知识的共同生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Sustainability Science offers insights into interactions within and between nature and the rest of human society, and the complex mechanisms that sustain both. The journal promotes science based predictions and impact assessments of global change, and seeks ways to ensure that such knowledge can be understood by society and be used to strengthen the resilience of global natural systems (such as ecosystems, ocean and atmospheric systems, nutrient cycles), social systems (economies, governments, industry) and human systems at the individual level (lifestyles, health, security, and human values).
期刊最新文献
Mountain research for sustainability: where are we and where to go? Sufficiency policy: a definition, conceptual framework, and application to municipalities Regional agroecological stewardship: a framework to analyze the (re)territorialization of sustainable food systems Knowledge based interventions for sustainable development cooperation: insights from knowledge systems mapping in Zambia Bridging the nature–cultural heritage gap: evaluating sustainable entanglements through cemeteries in urban Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1