Learning to co-teach: understanding the co- in a mentored co-teaching activity

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Professional Capital and Community Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1108/jpcc-05-2023-0031
Sharon Chang, A. Lin Goodwin
{"title":"Learning to co-teach: understanding the co- in a mentored co-teaching activity","authors":"Sharon Chang, A. Lin Goodwin","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-05-2023-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Co-teaching is a foundational mentoring model used in teacher residency programs in urban classrooms throughout the United States of America. Beyond the basic understanding of co-teaching in categorizing classroom models, the purpose of this qualitative case study is to investigate the dialectical tensions manifested in mentored co-teaching activities through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT). Design/methodology/approach Designed as a qualitative case study of 17 pairs of teaching-residents and mentor-teachers, the authors used thematic analysis to scrutinize archival interview data in an urban teacher residency program located in the largest megalopolis of the USA Northeast. The authors used CHAT-based concept coding to analyze the interview narratives from participants across different secondary school placements as they reflected on their co-teaching philosophy and the relationships they built. Findings The authors found that for teaching-residents and mentor-teachers to co-develop as co-teachers, they jointly must learn to resolve the dialectical tensions of unbalanced classroom ownership vs added co-working responsibilities, breaking from routine so that a partnership can grow. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the prefix co- should be understood as (1) shifts in thinking that transcend the status quo and (2) the orchestration of human capital to change norms. Originality/value This new understanding of the prefix co- allows teacher education programs to better mediate the dialectical tensions experienced by co-teachers in a mentored co-teaching activity, from individual teacher learning (e.g. a pair/dyad comprising one teaching-resident and one mentor-teacher) to collective co-learning across activity systems (e.g. partnership-based teacher education).","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-05-2023-0031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Co-teaching is a foundational mentoring model used in teacher residency programs in urban classrooms throughout the United States of America. Beyond the basic understanding of co-teaching in categorizing classroom models, the purpose of this qualitative case study is to investigate the dialectical tensions manifested in mentored co-teaching activities through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT). Design/methodology/approach Designed as a qualitative case study of 17 pairs of teaching-residents and mentor-teachers, the authors used thematic analysis to scrutinize archival interview data in an urban teacher residency program located in the largest megalopolis of the USA Northeast. The authors used CHAT-based concept coding to analyze the interview narratives from participants across different secondary school placements as they reflected on their co-teaching philosophy and the relationships they built. Findings The authors found that for teaching-residents and mentor-teachers to co-develop as co-teachers, they jointly must learn to resolve the dialectical tensions of unbalanced classroom ownership vs added co-working responsibilities, breaking from routine so that a partnership can grow. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the prefix co- should be understood as (1) shifts in thinking that transcend the status quo and (2) the orchestration of human capital to change norms. Originality/value This new understanding of the prefix co- allows teacher education programs to better mediate the dialectical tensions experienced by co-teachers in a mentored co-teaching activity, from individual teacher learning (e.g. a pair/dyad comprising one teaching-resident and one mentor-teacher) to collective co-learning across activity systems (e.g. partnership-based teacher education).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习合作教学:了解在有指导的合作教学活动中的合作
合作教学是美国城市教师实习项目中使用的一种基本指导模式。除了在课堂模式分类中对合作教学的基本理解之外,本定性案例研究的目的是通过文化历史活动理论(CHAT)的视角调查在指导下的合作教学活动中表现出的辩证紧张关系。设计/方法/方法作为17对教学-居民和导师-教师的定性案例研究,作者使用主题分析来仔细审查位于美国东北部最大大都市的城市教师居住计划的档案访谈数据。作者使用基于聊天的概念编码来分析来自不同中学实习的参与者的采访叙述,因为他们反映了他们的共同教学理念和他们建立的关系。研究发现,实习教师和导师教师要想共同发展,必须学会解决课堂所有权不平衡与共同工作责任增加之间的辩证关系,打破常规,使合作关系得以发展。此外,研究结果表明,前缀co-应该被理解为:(1)超越现状的思维转变;(2)人力资本的协调改变规范。这种对前缀co-的新理解使教师教育计划能够更好地调解共同教师在有指导的共同教学活动中所经历的辩证紧张关系,从个别教师学习(例如,由一名教学驻地和一名指导教师组成的一对/二人组)到跨活动系统的集体共同学习(例如,基于伙伴关系的教师教育)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
A call to adopt pedagogies of optimism in times of armed conflicts: theoretical and practical insights Learning with and from each other: creating safe spaces in a professional community for school leadership development How teachers enhance ICT integration practices within professional learning communities: a qualitative study in Tanzania The unbearable lightness of being implicated in conflict-affected societies: can teachers do anything about it? Educational leadership during a time of war in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1