Are some morphological units more prone to spelling variation than others? A case study using spontaneous handwritten data

IF 1.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Morphology Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1007/s11525-023-09417-4
Kristian Berg, Stefan Hartmann, Daniel Claeser
{"title":"Are some morphological units more prone to spelling variation than others? A case study using spontaneous handwritten data","authors":"Kristian Berg, Stefan Hartmann, Daniel Claeser","doi":"10.1007/s11525-023-09417-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relation between morphology and spelling is an important source of evidence for theories of linguistic processing. In particular, spelling errors can help us assess the role of morphological structure in language users’ mental representations of words in authentic texts. Previous research suggests that some morphological units are more prone to spelling errors than others, partly depending on the degree to which they are perceived as separate units. In this paper, we want to test this hypothesis by exploring graphemic variation in a collection of 1,667 German school-exit exams. Specifically, we code the spelling errors for their morphological structure. We can show that inflectional suffixes show a much higher probability of final letter omissions compared to final stems or derivational suffixes. We also find tentative evidence that case markers are more often affected by omissions than number markers.","PeriodicalId":51849,"journal":{"name":"Morphology","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-023-09417-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The relation between morphology and spelling is an important source of evidence for theories of linguistic processing. In particular, spelling errors can help us assess the role of morphological structure in language users’ mental representations of words in authentic texts. Previous research suggests that some morphological units are more prone to spelling errors than others, partly depending on the degree to which they are perceived as separate units. In this paper, we want to test this hypothesis by exploring graphemic variation in a collection of 1,667 German school-exit exams. Specifically, we code the spelling errors for their morphological structure. We can show that inflectional suffixes show a much higher probability of final letter omissions compared to final stems or derivational suffixes. We also find tentative evidence that case markers are more often affected by omissions than number markers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是否有些形态单位比其他单位更容易发生拼写变化?一个使用自发手写数据的案例研究
词法与拼写的关系是语言加工理论的重要证据来源。特别是,拼写错误可以帮助我们评估词形结构在真实文本中语言使用者对单词的心理表征中的作用。先前的研究表明,一些词形单位比其他单位更容易出现拼写错误,这部分取决于它们被视为独立单位的程度。在本文中,我们想通过探索1667份德国学校毕业考试的文字差异来检验这一假设。具体来说,我们根据拼写错误的形态结构对其进行编码。我们可以证明,与词干或衍生后缀相比,屈折后缀显示出最终字母遗漏的可能性要高得多。我们还发现初步证据表明,大小写标记比数字标记更容易受到省略的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Morphology
Morphology LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Aim The aim of Morphology is to publish high quality articles that contribute to the further articulation of morphological theory and linguistic theory in general, or present new and unexplored data. Relevant empirical evidence for the theoretical claims in the articles will be provided by in-depth analyses of specific languages or by comparative, cross-linguistic analyses of the relevant facts. The sources of data can be grammatical descriptions, corpora of data concerning language use and other naturalistic data, and experiments. Scope Morphology publishes articles on morphology proper, as well as articles on the interaction of morphology with phonology, syntax, and semantics, the acquisition and processing of morphological information, the nature of the mental lexicon, and morphological variation and change. Its main focus is on formal models of morphological knowledge, morphological typology (the range and limits of variation in natural languages), the position of morphology in the architecture of the human language faculty, and the evolution and change of language. In addition, the journal deals with the acquisition of morphological knowledge and its role in language processing. Articles on computational morphology and neurolinguistic approaches to morphology are also welcome. The first volume of Morphology appeared as Volume 16 (2006). Previous volumes were published under the title Yearbook of Morphology.
期刊最新文献
Allomorphy without context specification: a case study of Czech adjectival stems French liaison is allomorphy, not allophony: evidence from lexical statistics The pluralization palette: unveiling semantic clusters in English nominal pluralization through distributional semantics A Typology of Tonal Exponence VeLePa: Central Pame verbal inflection in a quantitative perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1