Impacts of sales mode and recycling mode on a closed-loop supply chain

IF 4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Systems Science-Operations & Logistics Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1080/23302674.2023.2221076
Nana Wan
{"title":"Impacts of sales mode and recycling mode on a closed-loop supply chain","authors":"Nana Wan","doi":"10.1080/23302674.2023.2221076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper forms a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer, within which the retail channel or dual-channel sales mode is chosen for selling products while the manufacturer, retailer or hybrid recycling mode is chosen for collecting used products. Based on different sales modes and recycling modes, six-game theory models are formulated to derive the optimal pricing and recycling rate decisions. Through the model comparisons and the numerical analysis, we investigate the strategies for choosing the optimal sales mode and the optimal recycling mode. We find that the customers, the environment and the manufacturer always prefer the dual-channel sales mode. However, the retailer prefers the dual-channel (retail channel) sales mode when the discount coefficient of demand is relatively low (high). Moreover, the customers, the environment and the manufacturer prefer the hybrid (retailer) recycling mode when the competing intensity of recycling is relatively low (high). However, the retailer prefers the hybrid (retailer) recycling mode in the retail channel CLSC while preferring the hybrid (manufacturer) recycling mode in the dual-channel CLSC when the competing intensity of recycling is relatively low (high).","PeriodicalId":46346,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Systems Science-Operations & Logistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Systems Science-Operations & Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2023.2221076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper forms a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer, within which the retail channel or dual-channel sales mode is chosen for selling products while the manufacturer, retailer or hybrid recycling mode is chosen for collecting used products. Based on different sales modes and recycling modes, six-game theory models are formulated to derive the optimal pricing and recycling rate decisions. Through the model comparisons and the numerical analysis, we investigate the strategies for choosing the optimal sales mode and the optimal recycling mode. We find that the customers, the environment and the manufacturer always prefer the dual-channel sales mode. However, the retailer prefers the dual-channel (retail channel) sales mode when the discount coefficient of demand is relatively low (high). Moreover, the customers, the environment and the manufacturer prefer the hybrid (retailer) recycling mode when the competing intensity of recycling is relatively low (high). However, the retailer prefers the hybrid (retailer) recycling mode in the retail channel CLSC while preferring the hybrid (manufacturer) recycling mode in the dual-channel CLSC when the competing intensity of recycling is relatively low (high).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
销售模式和回收模式对闭环供应链的影响
本文构建了一个由制造商和零售商组成的闭环供应链(CLSC),其中销售产品采用零售渠道或双渠道销售模式,回收废旧产品采用制造商、零售商或混合回收模式。基于不同的销售模式和回收模式,建立六博弈模型,推导出最优定价和回收率决策。通过模型比较和数值分析,探讨了最优销售模式和最优回收模式的选择策略。我们发现客户、环境和厂商都倾向于双渠道销售模式。而当需求折扣系数相对较低(较高)时,零售商更倾向于采用双渠道(零售渠道)销售模式。当回收竞争强度相对较低(高)时,消费者、环境和制造商更倾向于混合(零售商)回收模式。然而,在零售渠道CLSC中,零售商更倾向于采用混合(零售商)回收模式,而在双渠道CLSC中,当回收竞争强度相对较低(高)时,零售商更倾向于采用混合(制造商)回收模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of multi-level logistics network for agricultural products under community group buying model Redesigning a supply chain considering financing and pricing decisions and long-term disruptions under a pandemic Optimising railcar transfer chain via fuzzy programming and a simulated annealing algorithm Capacitated vertiport and charging station location-allocation problem for air taxi operations with battery and fleet dispatching considerations: a case study of New York city Pricing and quality competition between two substitute products in a closed-loop supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1