Impact of Flawed Self-Assessment on Learning Motivation in Emergency Point-of- Care Ultrasound

Joachim Bansbach, Milena Trifunovic-Koenig, Michael Bentele, Matthias Bollinger, Stefanie Bentele, Ronny Langenhan, Bianka Gerber, Stefan Bushuven
{"title":"Impact of Flawed Self-Assessment on Learning Motivation in Emergency Point-of- Care Ultrasound","authors":"Joachim Bansbach, Milena Trifunovic-Koenig, Michael Bentele, Matthias Bollinger, Stefanie Bentele, Ronny Langenhan, Bianka Gerber, Stefan Bushuven","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3083629/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction : Learning motivation is essential to obtain and maintain ultrasound competencies in emergency medicine. Where refresher training is not mandatory, self-assessment is required to evaluate one’s competencies and the need for further training. This can be flawed by overconfidence effects, which inhibits learners´ metacognition and possibly learning motivation. Methods : In this cross-sectional multicentre project, we presented eight ultrasound loops of different pathologies to emergency physicians of different specialities. In addition, the physicians assessed their own and others’ competence and learning motivation using the Situational Motivation Scale comprising intrinsic motivation, external and identified regulation, and amotivation. Results : We were unable to detect generalized overconfidence effects in 86 physicians. However, the subgroup analysis revealed that some specialist physicians with completed training were overconfident, while those still in training were not. Overplacement negatively correlated with intrinsic learning motivation and identified regulation and positively correlated to amotivation. Further analyses revealed that learning motivation was associated with the interactions of the physicians’ risk perception, speciality, and self-assessment. Discussions Our results show that some overconfidence effects are present even in the advanced skill of emergency ultrasound. However, an absence of feedback can lead to a misjudgement of own competencies and even reduce their willingness to participate in training. Particularly trainers and experts whose skills are not further assessed could pose a risk to the patient as they may overconfidently train learners incorrectly. Therefore, lifelong training in emergency ultrasound should include ongoing expert training to avoid misconceptions and ensure patient safety.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3083629/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction : Learning motivation is essential to obtain and maintain ultrasound competencies in emergency medicine. Where refresher training is not mandatory, self-assessment is required to evaluate one’s competencies and the need for further training. This can be flawed by overconfidence effects, which inhibits learners´ metacognition and possibly learning motivation. Methods : In this cross-sectional multicentre project, we presented eight ultrasound loops of different pathologies to emergency physicians of different specialities. In addition, the physicians assessed their own and others’ competence and learning motivation using the Situational Motivation Scale comprising intrinsic motivation, external and identified regulation, and amotivation. Results : We were unable to detect generalized overconfidence effects in 86 physicians. However, the subgroup analysis revealed that some specialist physicians with completed training were overconfident, while those still in training were not. Overplacement negatively correlated with intrinsic learning motivation and identified regulation and positively correlated to amotivation. Further analyses revealed that learning motivation was associated with the interactions of the physicians’ risk perception, speciality, and self-assessment. Discussions Our results show that some overconfidence effects are present even in the advanced skill of emergency ultrasound. However, an absence of feedback can lead to a misjudgement of own competencies and even reduce their willingness to participate in training. Particularly trainers and experts whose skills are not further assessed could pose a risk to the patient as they may overconfidently train learners incorrectly. Therefore, lifelong training in emergency ultrasound should include ongoing expert training to avoid misconceptions and ensure patient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有缺陷的自我评估对急诊点超声学习动机的影响
摘要简介:在急诊医学中,学习动机是获得和保持超声能力的必要条件。如果进修培训不是强制性的,则需要进行自我评估,以评估个人的能力和进一步培训的需要。这可能会受到过度自信的影响,它会抑制学习者的元认知,可能还会抑制学习动机。方法:在这个横断面多中心项目中,我们向不同专科的急诊医师展示了8个不同病理的超声环路。此外,医生使用情境动机量表评估自己和他人的能力和学习动机,该量表包括内在动机、外部和识别调节以及动机。结果:我们无法在86名医生中发现普遍的过度自信效应。然而,亚组分析显示,一些完成培训的专科医生过于自信,而那些仍在培训的专科医生则不然。过度安置与内在学习动机和识别调节负相关,与动机正相关。进一步的分析表明,学习动机与医生的风险认知、专业和自我评估的相互作用有关。我们的研究结果表明,即使在高级急诊超声技术中,也存在一些过度自信效应。然而,缺乏反馈会导致对自己能力的错误判断,甚至降低他们参与培训的意愿。特别是培训师和专家,他们的技能没有得到进一步的评估,可能会给患者带来风险,因为他们可能过于自信地错误地训练学习者。因此,急诊超声的终身培训应包括持续的专家培训,以避免误解并确保患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Event Reduction in Localization of DES Supervisory Control Semantic Relational Extraction via Learning Syntactic Structural Representation Vehicle Tracking System using Sensor Fusion with Signal Loss Compensation Automotive Tracking System with Signal Lost Compensation Bridging the Gap: Assessing the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare for Improved Efficiency and Doctor Adaptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1