Access to telehealth by stroke patients: which are the main barriers and how they are explained by the UTAUT theoretical model? A systematic review

Luana Karoline Castro Silva, Cristian Douglas Dantas de Sousa, Renata Viana Brígido de Moura Jucá, Ramon Távora Viana, Lidiane Andréa Oliveira Lima
{"title":"Access to telehealth by stroke patients: which are the main barriers and how they are explained by the UTAUT theoretical model? A systematic review","authors":"Luana Karoline Castro Silva, Cristian Douglas Dantas de Sousa, Renata Viana Brígido de Moura Jucá, Ramon Távora Viana, Lidiane Andréa Oliveira Lima","doi":"10.1590/1809-2950/e22009023en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stroke is a chronic health condition that requires monitoring. In this sense, telehealth emerges as a tool to enable better access. However, since it is related to use of technology, this modality might face new barriers. Our goal was to identify, with a systematic literature review, the perceived barriers to telehealth access by stroke patients and conceptualize them within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The systematic review was carried out in the following electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO, LILACS, and PEDro; and the combination of descriptors were: “Barriers to Access to Health Care,” “Telerehabilitation,” “Telehealth,” “Stroke,” and “Physical Therapy Modalities.” The included studies focused on telehealth barriers perceived by stroke patients. Initially, 298 articles were found, 295 via databases search, and three via active search; of these, only six articles were included in this review. Overall, the articles revealed the perception of more than 220 stroke patients, with barriers categorized into eight types, most of them related to the dimensions of Effort Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions of the UTAUT model. The barriers of the Effort Expectation dimension that are related to the knowledge in the use of technologies are likely to be overcome since training can be carried out before the telehealth service. However, the barriers related to the Facilitating Conditions dimension regarding financial aspects, the internet, and home context are difficult to overcome, possibly interfering with user’s acceptance of telehealth.","PeriodicalId":436434,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/e22009023en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Stroke is a chronic health condition that requires monitoring. In this sense, telehealth emerges as a tool to enable better access. However, since it is related to use of technology, this modality might face new barriers. Our goal was to identify, with a systematic literature review, the perceived barriers to telehealth access by stroke patients and conceptualize them within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The systematic review was carried out in the following electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO, LILACS, and PEDro; and the combination of descriptors were: “Barriers to Access to Health Care,” “Telerehabilitation,” “Telehealth,” “Stroke,” and “Physical Therapy Modalities.” The included studies focused on telehealth barriers perceived by stroke patients. Initially, 298 articles were found, 295 via databases search, and three via active search; of these, only six articles were included in this review. Overall, the articles revealed the perception of more than 220 stroke patients, with barriers categorized into eight types, most of them related to the dimensions of Effort Expectancy and Facilitating Conditions of the UTAUT model. The barriers of the Effort Expectation dimension that are related to the knowledge in the use of technologies are likely to be overcome since training can be carried out before the telehealth service. However, the barriers related to the Facilitating Conditions dimension regarding financial aspects, the internet, and home context are difficult to overcome, possibly interfering with user’s acceptance of telehealth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中风患者获得远程医疗:哪些是主要障碍,UTAUT理论模型如何解释这些障碍?系统回顾
脑卒中是一种需要监测的慢性健康状况。从这个意义上说,远程保健是一种能够更好地获得服务的工具。然而,由于它与技术的使用有关,这种方式可能面临新的障碍。我们的目标是通过系统的文献综述来确定中风患者远程医疗访问的感知障碍,并在技术接受和使用统一理论(UTAUT)模型中概念化它们。系统评价在以下电子数据库中进行:PubMed、MEDLINE、SciELO、LILACS和PEDro;描述符的组合是:“获得医疗保健的障碍”、“远程康复”、“远程医疗”、“中风”和“物理治疗方式”。纳入的研究侧重于中风患者感知到的远程医疗障碍。最初,发现了298篇文章,295篇通过数据库搜索,3篇通过主动搜索;其中,只有6篇文章被纳入本综述。总的来说,这些文章揭示了220多名中风患者的感知障碍,这些障碍分为八种类型,大多数与UTAUT模型的努力期望和促进条件的维度有关。由于可以在提供远程保健服务之前进行培训,因此可能会克服与技术使用方面的知识有关的努力期望方面的障碍。然而,在财务方面、互联网和家庭环境方面与便利条件有关的障碍难以克服,可能会妨碍用户接受远程保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acesso de pacientes com AVC à telessaúde: quais são as principais barreiras e como são explicadas pelo modelo teórico UTAUT? Uma revisão sistemática Alberta infant motor scale in Brazilian research: a bibliometric study Alberta infant motor scale em pesquisas brasileiras: estudo bibliométrico Association between isokinetic strength measures and functional performance in community-dwelling older adults Associação entre medidas de força isocinética e desempenho funcional em pessoas idosas da comunidade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1