Understanding narrative inquiry through life story interviews with former prisoners

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Irish Educational Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1080/03323315.2023.2257673
Angeliki Lima
{"title":"Understanding narrative inquiry through life story interviews with former prisoners","authors":"Angeliki Lima","doi":"10.1080/03323315.2023.2257673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Researchers’ reflections on narrative inquiry is a growing area of interest for the qualitative researchers’ community (Beuthin 2014; Bruce et al 2016; O’Grady, Clandinin and O’Toole 2018). Furthermore, the relationship between the insider and outsider, researcher and participant, in narrative research conducted in social sciences, including nursing, health sciences, and education, has been extensively explored (Berger 2015; Darwin Holmes 2020). This paper reports on a project in which life story interviews with former prisoners were conducted in Ireland and Greece. The aim is to contribute to our understanding and knowledge of narrative inquiry by providing insights into the methodology employed, along with the challenges faced and steps taken to address those challenges during the project. The paper begins with a reflective account of the author’s experience as a researcher engaging in narrative inquiry, focusing on the rationale behind choosing this method and issues of design, positionality, ethics and access. Then the focus shifts to how the fieldwork in two European countries allowed the author to explore the cross-cultural boundaries of narrative inquiry. Finally, the paper concludes with a persuasive argument on the value of narrative inquiry, drawing upon the insights and findings from the research project.","PeriodicalId":46076,"journal":{"name":"Irish Educational Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2257673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Researchers’ reflections on narrative inquiry is a growing area of interest for the qualitative researchers’ community (Beuthin 2014; Bruce et al 2016; O’Grady, Clandinin and O’Toole 2018). Furthermore, the relationship between the insider and outsider, researcher and participant, in narrative research conducted in social sciences, including nursing, health sciences, and education, has been extensively explored (Berger 2015; Darwin Holmes 2020). This paper reports on a project in which life story interviews with former prisoners were conducted in Ireland and Greece. The aim is to contribute to our understanding and knowledge of narrative inquiry by providing insights into the methodology employed, along with the challenges faced and steps taken to address those challenges during the project. The paper begins with a reflective account of the author’s experience as a researcher engaging in narrative inquiry, focusing on the rationale behind choosing this method and issues of design, positionality, ethics and access. Then the focus shifts to how the fieldwork in two European countries allowed the author to explore the cross-cultural boundaries of narrative inquiry. Finally, the paper concludes with a persuasive argument on the value of narrative inquiry, drawing upon the insights and findings from the research project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对前囚犯的生活故事采访来理解叙事探究
研究人员对叙事探究的反思是定性研究人员社区越来越感兴趣的领域(2014年;Bruce et al . 2016;O’grady, Clandinin and O’toole 2018)。此外,在社会科学(包括护理、健康科学和教育)进行的叙事研究中,圈内人与局外人、研究者与参与者之间的关系得到了广泛的探讨(Berger 2015;达尔文·霍姆斯,2020)。本文报道了一个项目,其中在爱尔兰和希腊对前囚犯进行了生活故事采访。目的是通过提供对所采用的方法的见解,以及在项目中面临的挑战和解决这些挑战所采取的步骤,有助于我们对叙事探究的理解和知识。本文首先反思了作者作为一名从事叙事探究的研究人员的经历,重点是选择这种方法背后的基本原理以及设计、定位、伦理和访问等问题。然后,重点转移到在两个欧洲国家的实地考察如何使作者探索叙事探究的跨文化边界。最后,本文总结了一个有说服力的论点,叙述探究的价值,借鉴了研究项目的见解和发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Educational Studies
Irish Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
23.50%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
The characteristic elements of TeachMeet Strengthening wellbeing in schools after COVID-19: a pilot evaluation of an awareness based intervention for children and young people Workaholism in higher education. An exploration of the cognitive, emotional, motivational, and behavioural elements ‘I’ll do it tomorrow’: supporting the engagement of primary pre-service teachers through blended, inquiry-based learning ‘Bearing witness to negativity’: towards just futures of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1