Comparison of five routine methods with the candidate reference method for the determination of bilirubin in neonatal serum.

H Schlebusch, K Axer, C Schneider, N Liappis, G Röhle
{"title":"Comparison of five routine methods with the candidate reference method for the determination of bilirubin in neonatal serum.","authors":"H Schlebusch,&nbsp;K Axer,&nbsp;C Schneider,&nbsp;N Liappis,&nbsp;G Röhle","doi":"10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using five routine methods and the candidate reference method of Doumas (Clin. Chem. 31, 1779-1789 (1985)), total bilirubin was determined in 77 neonatal serum samples (concentration range 63-444 mumol/l, average value 227 mumol/l). Four of the routine methods (Jendrassik & Grof's (Biochem. Z. 297, 81-89 (1938)) method, Hertz's (Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 33, 215-230 (1974)) method, the bilirubinometer procedure, and the method employing 2,5-dichlorophenyldiazonium (Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 29, Suppl. 126, Abstr. 11. 12. (1972]) gave values that were generally higher than those of the reference method. In contrast, the results from Vink's (Clin. Chem. 34, 67-70 (1988] direct spectrophotometric method differed only negligibly from those of the reference method. The accuracy of Jendrassik & Grof's method, and to a limited extent that of the 2,5-dichlorophenyldiazonium method, can be improved by redetermination of the molar absorption coefficient, or by using a standard containing a matrix of human albumin, with an assigned value determined by the reference method. It was found that Hertz's direct spectrophotometric method can be replaced by that of Vink. The accuracy of the bilirubinometer results could be improved only by using calibrators with assigned values specific for the bilimeter, or by calibration with a serum pool.</p>","PeriodicalId":15649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","volume":"28 4","pages":"203-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.203","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Using five routine methods and the candidate reference method of Doumas (Clin. Chem. 31, 1779-1789 (1985)), total bilirubin was determined in 77 neonatal serum samples (concentration range 63-444 mumol/l, average value 227 mumol/l). Four of the routine methods (Jendrassik & Grof's (Biochem. Z. 297, 81-89 (1938)) method, Hertz's (Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 33, 215-230 (1974)) method, the bilirubinometer procedure, and the method employing 2,5-dichlorophenyldiazonium (Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 29, Suppl. 126, Abstr. 11. 12. (1972]) gave values that were generally higher than those of the reference method. In contrast, the results from Vink's (Clin. Chem. 34, 67-70 (1988] direct spectrophotometric method differed only negligibly from those of the reference method. The accuracy of Jendrassik & Grof's method, and to a limited extent that of the 2,5-dichlorophenyldiazonium method, can be improved by redetermination of the molar absorption coefficient, or by using a standard containing a matrix of human albumin, with an assigned value determined by the reference method. It was found that Hertz's direct spectrophotometric method can be replaced by that of Vink. The accuracy of the bilirubinometer results could be improved only by using calibrators with assigned values specific for the bilimeter, or by calibration with a serum pool.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5种常规方法与候选参考方法测定新生儿血清胆红素的比较。
采用五种常规方法和候选参考方法。化学,31,1779-1789(1985)),测定了77例新生儿血清中总胆红素(浓度范围63-444 μ mol/l,平均值227 μ mol/l)。四种常规方法(Jendrassik & Grof的《生物化学》)。Z. 297,81 -89(1938))方法,赫兹(Scand。j .中国。实验室。投资,33,215-230(1974))方法,胆红素计程序,以及使用2,5-二氯苯基重氮(Scand。j .中国。实验室。投资29,增刊126,摘要11。12. (1972)给出的值通常高于参考方法的值。相比之下,Vink的研究结果。化学,34,67-70(1988)直接分光光度法与参比法的差异可忽略不计。Jendrassik & Grof方法的准确性,以及2,5-二氯苯基重氮法的准确性在一定程度上,可以通过重新测定摩尔吸收系数,或使用含有人白蛋白基质的标准品,并通过参考方法确定指定值来提高。发现赫兹直接分光光度法可以用Vink法代替。胆红素计结果的准确性只能通过使用特定于胆红素计的指定值的校准器或通过血清池校准来提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Memorandum for the evaluation of diagnostic measures. An extraction/enzymatic procedure for serum cholesterol measurement: evaluation of performance characteristics. CA 19-9 and CA 125 determination by immunoluminometric assay. The effect of pretreatment of saliva on steroid hormone concentrations. Multicentre evaluation of an enzyme-immunoassay for cortisol determination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1