Course correction: The role of reflective writing assessment in a post-pandemic academic literacy course

Q3 Social Sciences Perspectives in Education Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.38140/pie.v41i3.7291
{"title":"Course correction: The role of reflective writing assessment in a post-pandemic academic literacy course","authors":"","doi":"10.38140/pie.v41i3.7291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this conceptual paper, borne from the experiences of two ccademic literacy lecturers at the NWU, we ask, regarding elements of assessment, how we can sensibly adapt an intervention-style writing course in a post-Covid higher education context. We propose a course correction model, applicable to academic literacy writing courses, to address the pedagogical lacunae highlighted in a pre-pandemic context and compounded in the post-pandemic higher education context. We argue for the adaption of this writing course to contend with the under-preparedness of students for higher education, the issue of online learning and resultant student cognitive overload and additional challenges, such as the rapid development of AI and its effects on teaching and learning, and specifically writing courses. An important element which needs to be reconceptualised within the context of our compounded problem, is that of the writing assessment. In this paper we argue for moving away from placing major emphasis on assessing the final product of writing and shifting some focus to the pedagogical value of examining the student’s journey of writing. We therefore propose incorporating reflective writing as a significant element of assessment through our reflect-rewrite-model. The goal of this proposed model is to create a space for fostering student self-awareness, responsibility, critical thinking, and evaluation skills. Such outcomes should then contribute to the creation of effective and contextually relevant, academic skills development, which in turn should positively influence student success and mitigate some of the issues currently experienced in the module offering.","PeriodicalId":19864,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Education","volume":"491 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v41i3.7291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this conceptual paper, borne from the experiences of two ccademic literacy lecturers at the NWU, we ask, regarding elements of assessment, how we can sensibly adapt an intervention-style writing course in a post-Covid higher education context. We propose a course correction model, applicable to academic literacy writing courses, to address the pedagogical lacunae highlighted in a pre-pandemic context and compounded in the post-pandemic higher education context. We argue for the adaption of this writing course to contend with the under-preparedness of students for higher education, the issue of online learning and resultant student cognitive overload and additional challenges, such as the rapid development of AI and its effects on teaching and learning, and specifically writing courses. An important element which needs to be reconceptualised within the context of our compounded problem, is that of the writing assessment. In this paper we argue for moving away from placing major emphasis on assessing the final product of writing and shifting some focus to the pedagogical value of examining the student’s journey of writing. We therefore propose incorporating reflective writing as a significant element of assessment through our reflect-rewrite-model. The goal of this proposed model is to create a space for fostering student self-awareness, responsibility, critical thinking, and evaluation skills. Such outcomes should then contribute to the creation of effective and contextually relevant, academic skills development, which in turn should positively influence student success and mitigate some of the issues currently experienced in the module offering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课程修正:反思性写作评估在大流行后学术扫盲课程中的作用
在这篇概念性论文中,我们根据北吴大学两位学术素养讲师的经验,就评估要素提出了疑问,即我们如何在新冠肺炎疫情后的高等教育背景下明智地调整干预式写作课程。我们提出了一种课程修正模式,适用于学术扫盲写作课程,以解决大流行前背景下突出的教学空白,并在大流行后高等教育背景下更加复杂。我们主张调整这门写作课程,以应对学生对高等教育的准备不足、在线学习的问题以及由此导致的学生认知超载和其他挑战,例如人工智能的快速发展及其对教学和学习的影响,特别是写作课程。在我们的复杂问题的背景下,需要重新概念化的一个重要因素是写作评估。在本文中,我们主张将重点从评估写作的最终成果转移到检查学生写作过程的教学价值上。因此,我们建议通过我们的反思-重写模型,将反思性写作作为评估的重要元素。这种模式的目标是创造一个培养学生自我意识、责任感、批判性思维和评估技能的空间。这样的结果应该有助于创造有效的和与环境相关的学术技能发展,这反过来应该对学生的成功产生积极影响,并缓解目前在模块提供中遇到的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Education
Perspectives in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Education is a professional, refereed journal, which encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on contemporary educational issues. As a journal that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, it seeks to stimulate debates on a wide range of topics. PIE invites manuscripts employing innovative qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches including (but not limited to) ethnographic observation and interviewing, grounded theory, life history, case study, curriculum analysis and critique, policy studies, ethnomethodology, social and educational critique, phenomenology, deconstruction, and genealogy. Debates on epistemology, methodology, or ethics, from a range of perspectives including postpositivism, interpretivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, post-modernism are also invited. PIE seeks to stimulate important dialogues and intellectual exchange on education and democratic transition with respect to schools, colleges, non-governmental organisations, universities and technikons in South Africa and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Grade R teachers’ perceptions concerning parental participation in early literacy development in a disadvantaged context in the Western Cape An exploration of African-student agency: Placing students from historically disadvantaged communities at the centre A systematic review of the implications for teaching, learning and assessment at South African universities after the Covid-19 pandemic Self-Assessment Inclusion Scale (SAIS): a tool for measuring inclusive competence and sensitivity Investigating nomophobia as a possible mental health disorder in Gauteng public schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1