Information vs. Presentation: Three Different Approaches to Media Organizations’ Science Communication on Instagram

Rosanna Planer, Daniel Seibert, Alexander Godulla, Hannah Lea Ötting
{"title":"Information vs. Presentation: Three Different Approaches to Media Organizations’ Science Communication on Instagram","authors":"Rosanna Planer, Daniel Seibert, Alexander Godulla, Hannah Lea Ötting","doi":"10.3390/journalmedia4040071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As science journalism is growing in importance and reader interest, the social media platform Instagram provides new opportunities for media organizations to distribute scientific content. The growing danger of fake news and misinformation, as well as the ongoing pandemic and trends in media consumption patterns, make it increasingly necessary for science journalists to deliver reliable content in a well-designed manner on digital platforms. This study investigates how German media companies and individual journalists inform lay audiences on new publications, findings, and developments in sciences, using the platform Instagram. A representative quantitative content analysis of Instagram posts (n = 2.605) of nine wide-ranging German accounts related to science journalism shows that the three analyzed groups (public service media outlets, private outlets, and individual journalists) pursue significantly different approaches in how they communicate scientific content on Instagram—ranging from informative to entertaining posts—varying in their text length, the complexity of the media elements used, and the tone of voice. The results shed light on a diversification of journalistic approaches to communicating scientific content on Instagram, as well as which approaches seem fruitful. Thereby, the nature of the media organization influences the complexity, design, and purpose of their science communication on Instagram.","PeriodicalId":17629,"journal":{"name":"Journalism and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4040071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As science journalism is growing in importance and reader interest, the social media platform Instagram provides new opportunities for media organizations to distribute scientific content. The growing danger of fake news and misinformation, as well as the ongoing pandemic and trends in media consumption patterns, make it increasingly necessary for science journalists to deliver reliable content in a well-designed manner on digital platforms. This study investigates how German media companies and individual journalists inform lay audiences on new publications, findings, and developments in sciences, using the platform Instagram. A representative quantitative content analysis of Instagram posts (n = 2.605) of nine wide-ranging German accounts related to science journalism shows that the three analyzed groups (public service media outlets, private outlets, and individual journalists) pursue significantly different approaches in how they communicate scientific content on Instagram—ranging from informative to entertaining posts—varying in their text length, the complexity of the media elements used, and the tone of voice. The results shed light on a diversification of journalistic approaches to communicating scientific content on Instagram, as well as which approaches seem fruitful. Thereby, the nature of the media organization influences the complexity, design, and purpose of their science communication on Instagram.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息与呈现:媒体机构在Instagram上进行科学传播的三种不同方式
随着科学新闻的重要性和读者兴趣的增长,社交媒体平台Instagram为媒体机构提供了传播科学内容的新机会。假新闻和错误信息日益增加的危险,以及媒体消费模式的持续流行和趋势,使得科学记者越来越有必要在数字平台上以精心设计的方式提供可靠的内容。这项研究调查了德国媒体公司和个人记者如何利用Instagram平台向普通受众介绍新的出版物、发现和科学发展。对九个与科学新闻相关的广泛德国账户的Instagram帖子(n = 2.605)进行的具有代表性的定量内容分析表明,三个被分析的群体(公共服务媒体、私人媒体和个人记者)在如何在Instagram上传播科学内容方面采取了显著不同的方法——从信息性帖子到娱乐性帖子——在文本长度、使用的媒体元素的复杂性和语气上都有所不同。研究结果揭示了在Instagram上传播科学内容的新闻方法的多样化,以及哪些方法看起来富有成效。因此,媒体组织的性质影响了他们在Instagram上进行科学传播的复杂性、设计和目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intermediaries between Journalism and Arts: Shared Concerns, Work Processes and Strategies Outlining an Emergent Practice Rethinking the Relation between Media and Their Audience: The Discursive Construction of the Risk of Artificial Intelligence in the Press of Belgium, France, Portugal, and Spain 360° Journalism and Empathy: Psychological Processes and Communication Outcomes Russia–Ukraine Propaganda on Social Media: A Bibliometric Analysis Profile, Incidence, and Perspectives of Disinformation among Ecuadorians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1