An intrinsic causality principle in histories-based quantum theory: a proposal

Fay Dowker, R D Sorkin
{"title":"An intrinsic causality principle in histories-based quantum theory: a proposal","authors":"Fay Dowker, R D Sorkin","doi":"10.1088/1751-8121/ad0347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Relativistic causality (RC) is the principle that no cause can act outside its future light cone, but any attempt to formulate this principle more precisely will depend on the foundational framework that one adopts for quantum theory. Adopting a histories-based (or ‘path integral’) framework, we relate RC to a condition we term ‘Persistence of Zero’ (PoZ), according to which an event E of measure zero remains forbidden if one forms its conjunction with any other event associated to a spacetime region that is later than or spacelike to that of E . We also relate PoZ to the Bell inequalities by showing that, in combination with a second, more technical condition it leads to the quantal counterpart of Fine’s patching theorem in much the same way as Bell’s condition of local causality leads to Fine’s original theorem. We then argue that RC per se has very little to say on the matter of which correlations can occur in nature and which cannot. From the point of view we arrive at, histories-based quantum theories are nonlocal in spacetime , and fully in compliance with RC .","PeriodicalId":16785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics A","volume":"74 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad0347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Relativistic causality (RC) is the principle that no cause can act outside its future light cone, but any attempt to formulate this principle more precisely will depend on the foundational framework that one adopts for quantum theory. Adopting a histories-based (or ‘path integral’) framework, we relate RC to a condition we term ‘Persistence of Zero’ (PoZ), according to which an event E of measure zero remains forbidden if one forms its conjunction with any other event associated to a spacetime region that is later than or spacelike to that of E . We also relate PoZ to the Bell inequalities by showing that, in combination with a second, more technical condition it leads to the quantal counterpart of Fine’s patching theorem in much the same way as Bell’s condition of local causality leads to Fine’s original theorem. We then argue that RC per se has very little to say on the matter of which correlations can occur in nature and which cannot. From the point of view we arrive at, histories-based quantum theories are nonlocal in spacetime , and fully in compliance with RC .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于历史的量子理论中的内在因果关系原理:一个建议
相对论因果关系(RC)是一种原理,即任何原因都不能在其未来光锥之外起作用,但任何更精确地表述这一原理的尝试都将取决于人们采用的量子理论的基本框架。采用基于历史的(或“路径积分”)框架,我们将RC与我们称之为“零的持久性”(PoZ)的条件联系起来,根据该条件,如果测度为零的事件E与任何其他与时空区域相关的事件形成关联,则该事件E将被禁止与晚于或类似于E的时空区域。我们还将PoZ与贝尔不等式联系起来,通过展示,与第二个更技术性的条件结合,它导致了Fine修补定理的量子对应,就像Bell的局部因果关系条件导致了Fine的原始定理一样。然后,我们认为,RC本身对自然界中哪些相关性可以发生,哪些不能发生的问题几乎没有什么可说的。从我们得出的观点来看,基于历史的量子理论在时空中是非局域的,并且完全符合RC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laplace transformations and sine-Gordon type integrable PDE Quantum curl forces Using a resource theoretic perspective to witness and engineer quantum generalized contextuality for prepare-and-measure scenarios Lower bound on operation time of composite quantum gates robust against pulse length error Coagulation equations with source leading to anomalousself-similarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1