Low Surface Brightness Galaxies selected by different model fitting

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1088/1674-4527/ad0b86
Bing-qing Zhang, Hong Wu, Wei Du, pinsong zhao, Min He, Feng-Jie Lei
{"title":"Low Surface Brightness Galaxies selected by different model fitting","authors":"Bing-qing Zhang, Hong Wu, Wei Du, pinsong zhao, Min He, Feng-Jie Lei","doi":"10.1088/1674-4527/ad0b86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We present a study of low surface brightness galaxies (LSBGs) selection by fitting the images for all the galaxies in α.40 SDSS DR7 sample with two kinds of single-component model and two kinds of two-component model (disk+bulge): single exponential, single sérsic, exponential+deVaucular (exp+deV), and exponential+sérsic (exp+ser). Under the criteria of the B band disk central surface brightness µ0,disk(B) ⩾ 22.5 mag arcsec−2 and the axis ratio b/a > 0.3, we selected four none-edge-on LSBG samples from each of the models which contains 1105, 1038, 207, and 75 galaxies, respectively. There are 756 galaxies in common between LSBGs selected by exponential and sérsic models, corresponding to 68.42% of LSBGs selected by exponential model and 72.83% of LSBGs selected by sérsic model, the rest of the discrepancy is due to the difference in obtaining µ0 between the exponential and sérsic models. Based on the fitting, in the range of 0.5 ≤ n ≤ 1.5, the relation of µ0 from two models can be written as µ0,sersic − µ0,exp = −1.345(n − 1). The LSBGs selected by disk+bulge models (LSBG_2comps) are more massive than LSBGs selected by single-component models (LSBG_1comp), and also show a larger disk component. Though the bulges in the majority of our LSBG_2comps are not prominent, more than 60% of our LSBG_2comps will not be selected if we adopt a single-component model only. We also identified 31 giant low surface brightness galaxies (gLSBGs) from LSBG_2comps. They locate at the same region in the color-magnitude diagram as other gLSBGs. After we compared different criteria of gLSBGs selection, we find that for gas-rich LSBGs, M⋆ > 1010M⊙ is the best to distinguish between gLSBGs and normal LSBGs with bulge.","PeriodicalId":54494,"journal":{"name":"Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"80 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad0b86","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We present a study of low surface brightness galaxies (LSBGs) selection by fitting the images for all the galaxies in α.40 SDSS DR7 sample with two kinds of single-component model and two kinds of two-component model (disk+bulge): single exponential, single sérsic, exponential+deVaucular (exp+deV), and exponential+sérsic (exp+ser). Under the criteria of the B band disk central surface brightness µ0,disk(B) ⩾ 22.5 mag arcsec−2 and the axis ratio b/a > 0.3, we selected four none-edge-on LSBG samples from each of the models which contains 1105, 1038, 207, and 75 galaxies, respectively. There are 756 galaxies in common between LSBGs selected by exponential and sérsic models, corresponding to 68.42% of LSBGs selected by exponential model and 72.83% of LSBGs selected by sérsic model, the rest of the discrepancy is due to the difference in obtaining µ0 between the exponential and sérsic models. Based on the fitting, in the range of 0.5 ≤ n ≤ 1.5, the relation of µ0 from two models can be written as µ0,sersic − µ0,exp = −1.345(n − 1). The LSBGs selected by disk+bulge models (LSBG_2comps) are more massive than LSBGs selected by single-component models (LSBG_1comp), and also show a larger disk component. Though the bulges in the majority of our LSBG_2comps are not prominent, more than 60% of our LSBG_2comps will not be selected if we adopt a single-component model only. We also identified 31 giant low surface brightness galaxies (gLSBGs) from LSBG_2comps. They locate at the same region in the color-magnitude diagram as other gLSBGs. After we compared different criteria of gLSBGs selection, we find that for gas-rich LSBGs, M⋆ > 1010M⊙ is the best to distinguish between gLSBGs and normal LSBGs with bulge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同模型拟合选择的低表面亮度星系
摘要通过对α.40中所有星系的图像进行拟合,研究了低表面亮度星系(LSBGs)的选择问题SDSS DR7样本具有两种单组分模型和两种双组分模型(盘+鼓):单指数、单ssamursic、指数+deVaucular (exp+deV)和指数+ ssamursic (exp+ser)。在B波段磁盘中心表面亮度µ0,磁盘(B)小于22.5 mag arcsec−2和轴比B /a >的标准下;0.3,我们从每个模型中分别选择了4个非边缘上的LSBG样本,分别包含1105个,1038个,207个和75个星系。指数模型和ssamrsic模型选择的LSBGs共有756个星系,对应于指数模型选择的LSBGs的68.42%和ssamrsic模型选择的LSBGs的72.83%,其余的差异是由于指数模型和ssamrsic模型在获得µ0上的差异。根据拟合结果,在0.5≤n≤1.5范围内,两种模型的µ0关系可表示为µ0,sersic−µ0,exp =−1.345(n−1)。圆盘+凸块模型(LSBG_2comps)选择的lsbg比单组分模型(LSBG_1comp)选择的lsbg质量更大,并且显示出更大的圆盘分量。虽然我们大多数LSBG_2comps中的凸起并不突出,但如果我们只采用单组件模型,则超过60%的LSBG_2comps将不会被选中。我们还从LSBG_2comps中发现了31个巨大的低表面亮度星系(glsbg)。它们与其他glsbg位于颜色星等图中的同一区域。在比较了不同的glsbg选择标准后,我们发现对于富气lsbg, M - >1010M⊙是区分glsbg和带凸起的正常lsbg的最佳参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
2599
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (RAA) is an international journal publishing original research papers and reviews across all branches of astronomy and astrophysics, with a particular interest in the following topics: -large-scale structure of universe formation and evolution of galaxies- high-energy and cataclysmic processes in astrophysics- formation and evolution of stars- astrogeodynamics- solar magnetic activity and heliogeospace environments- dynamics of celestial bodies in the solar system and artificial bodies- space observation and exploration- new astronomical techniques and methods
期刊最新文献
Comparison of NH3 and 12CO, 13CO, C18O Molecular Lines in the Aquila Rift Cloud Complex SFNet: Stellar Feature Network with CWT for Stellar Spectra Recognition A Study of the Comets with Large Perihelion Distances C/2019 L3 (ATLAS) and C/2019 O3 (Palomar) Understanding the Impact of H2 Diffusion Energy on the Formation Efficiency of H2 on the Interstellar Dust Grain Surface Leveraging the Empirical Wavelet Transform in Combination with Convolutional LSTM Neural Networks to Enhance the Accuracy of Polar Motion Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1