The Efficacy of Combination Therapy with Ustekinumab and Budesonide for Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q2 Medicine Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1159/000535070
Rintaro Moroi, Kasumi Hishinuma, Yumi Sugawara, Kotaro Nochioka, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Yoichi Kakuta, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Ichiro Tsuji, Atsushi Masamune
{"title":"The Efficacy of Combination Therapy with Ustekinumab and Budesonide for Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Rintaro Moroi, Kasumi Hishinuma, Yumi Sugawara, Kotaro Nochioka, Yusuke Shimoyama, Takeo Naito, Hisashi Shiga, Yoichi Kakuta, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Ichiro Tsuji, Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.1159/000535070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Limited data exist on the efficacy of combination therapy with ustekinumab and budesonide in patients with Crohn’s disease. Our objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of ustekinumab and budesonide combination therapy with those of ustekinumab monotherapy. Methods: In this Phase 2 single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we assigned 19 patients with Crohn’s disease with a Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) equal to or greater than 220 and less than 450 in a 1:1 ratio to receive ustekinumab and budesonide or ustekinumab for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission rate at 8 weeks. The secondary endpoints were the clinical remission rate at 32 weeks and mucosal healing rates at 8 and 32 weeks. Results: Of 19 patients, the mean age was 37.8 years, and 42.1% were women (CDAI ≥220 and <450). There was no difference between combination therapy and ustekinumab monotherapy in terms of clinical remission rates (50.0% vs. 30.0%, P=0.39 at 8 weeks and 37.5% vs. 20.0%, P=0.41) and mucosal healing rates (75.0% vs. 90.0%, P= 0.40 and 37.5% vs. 60.0%, P=0.34 at 8 and 32 weeks, respectively). The most common adverse event was an exacerbation of Crohn’s. There were no differences in safety profiles between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study showed no difference between ustekinumab monotherapy and ustekinumab and budesonide combination therapy in terms of the induction and maintenance of remission (trial registration number: jRCTs021200013).","PeriodicalId":13605,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","volume":"76 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Limited data exist on the efficacy of combination therapy with ustekinumab and budesonide in patients with Crohn’s disease. Our objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of ustekinumab and budesonide combination therapy with those of ustekinumab monotherapy. Methods: In this Phase 2 single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we assigned 19 patients with Crohn’s disease with a Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) equal to or greater than 220 and less than 450 in a 1:1 ratio to receive ustekinumab and budesonide or ustekinumab for 32 weeks. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission rate at 8 weeks. The secondary endpoints were the clinical remission rate at 32 weeks and mucosal healing rates at 8 and 32 weeks. Results: Of 19 patients, the mean age was 37.8 years, and 42.1% were women (CDAI ≥220 and <450). There was no difference between combination therapy and ustekinumab monotherapy in terms of clinical remission rates (50.0% vs. 30.0%, P=0.39 at 8 weeks and 37.5% vs. 20.0%, P=0.41) and mucosal healing rates (75.0% vs. 90.0%, P= 0.40 and 37.5% vs. 60.0%, P=0.34 at 8 and 32 weeks, respectively). The most common adverse event was an exacerbation of Crohn’s. There were no differences in safety profiles between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study showed no difference between ustekinumab monotherapy and ustekinumab and budesonide combination therapy in terms of the induction and maintenance of remission (trial registration number: jRCTs021200013).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ustekinumab和布地奈德联合治疗克罗恩病的疗效:一项随机对照试验
关于ustekinumab和布地奈德联合治疗克罗恩病患者的疗效的数据有限。我们的目的是比较ustekinumab和布地奈德联合治疗与ustekinumab单药治疗的临床结果。方法:在这项2期单中心、双盲、随机对照试验中,我们将19例克罗恩病活动性指数(CDAI)等于或大于220且小于450的克罗恩病患者按1:1的比例分配给ustekinumab和布地奈德或ustekinumab治疗32周。主要终点是8周时的临床缓解率。次要终点是32周的临床缓解率和8周和32周的粘膜愈合率。结果:19例患者平均年龄37.8岁,女性占42.1% (CDAI≥220,<450)。联合治疗和ustekinumab单药治疗在临床缓解率(50.0% vs. 30.0%, 8周时P=0.39; 37.5% vs. 20.0%, P=0.41)和粘膜愈合率(75.0% vs. 90.0%, P= 0.40; 37.5% vs. 60.0%, 8周和32周时P=0.34)方面没有差异。最常见的不良事件是克罗恩病的恶化。两组之间在安全性方面没有差异。结论:我们的研究显示,在诱导和维持缓解方面,ustekinumab单药治疗与ustekinumab和布地奈德联合治疗没有差异(试验注册号:jRCTs021200013)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Esophageal Physiologic Tests in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Carotegrast Methyl in Japanese Patients with Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis. Perceptions and Responses to Diseases among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Text Mining Analysis of Posts on a Japanese Patient Community Website. Impact of Concomitant Prescriptions and Lifestyle Factors on the Initial Course of Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease. A Real-World Comparison of Drug Trough Levels between Patients Experiencing a Secondary Nonimmune Loss of Response and Those Maintaining a Response to Infliximab on Long-Term Maintenance Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1