Opportunities and Challenges for AI-Based Analysis of RWD in Pharmaceutical R&D: A Practical Perspective

Merle Behr, Rolf Burghaus, Christian Diedrich, Jörg Lippert
{"title":"Opportunities and Challenges for AI-Based Analysis of RWD in Pharmaceutical R&D: A Practical Perspective","authors":"Merle Behr, Rolf Burghaus, Christian Diedrich, Jörg Lippert","doi":"10.1007/s13218-023-00809-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Real world data (RWD) has become an important tool in pharmaceutical research and development. Generated every time patients interact with the healthcare system when diagnoses are developed and medical interventions are selected, RWD are massive and in many regards typical big data. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze RWD seems an obvious choice. It promises new insights into medical need, drivers of diseases, and new opportunities for pharmacological interventions. When put into practice RWD analyses are challenging. The distributed generation of data, under sub-optimally standardized conditions in a patient-oriented but not information maximizing healthcare transaction, leads to a high level of sparseness and uncontrolled biases. We discuss why this needs to be addressed independent of the type of analysis approach. While classical statistical analysis and modeling approaches provide a rigorous framework for the handling of bias and sparseness, AI methods are not necessarily suited when applied naively. Special precautions need to be taken from choice of method until interpretation of results to prevent potentially harmful fallacies. The conscious use of prior medical subject matter expertise may also be required. Based on typical application examples we illustrate challenges and methodological considerations.","PeriodicalId":192555,"journal":{"name":"KI - Künstliche Intelligenz","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KI - Künstliche Intelligenz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-023-00809-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Real world data (RWD) has become an important tool in pharmaceutical research and development. Generated every time patients interact with the healthcare system when diagnoses are developed and medical interventions are selected, RWD are massive and in many regards typical big data. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze RWD seems an obvious choice. It promises new insights into medical need, drivers of diseases, and new opportunities for pharmacological interventions. When put into practice RWD analyses are challenging. The distributed generation of data, under sub-optimally standardized conditions in a patient-oriented but not information maximizing healthcare transaction, leads to a high level of sparseness and uncontrolled biases. We discuss why this needs to be addressed independent of the type of analysis approach. While classical statistical analysis and modeling approaches provide a rigorous framework for the handling of bias and sparseness, AI methods are not necessarily suited when applied naively. Special precautions need to be taken from choice of method until interpretation of results to prevent potentially harmful fallacies. The conscious use of prior medical subject matter expertise may also be required. Based on typical application examples we illustrate challenges and methodological considerations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的制药研发RWD分析的机遇与挑战:一个实践视角
摘要真实世界数据(Real world data, RWD)已成为药物研究与开发的重要工具。RWD是在患者与医疗保健系统互动时产生的,在诊断制定和医疗干预措施选择时,RWD是巨大的,在许多方面都是典型的大数据。利用人工智能(AI)分析RWD似乎是一个显而易见的选择。它承诺对医疗需求、疾病驱动因素和药理学干预的新机会有新的见解。在实际应用中,RWD分析具有挑战性。在面向患者而非信息最大化的医疗保健交易中,在次优标准化条件下的分布式数据生成会导致高度稀疏和不受控制的偏差。我们讨论了为什么需要独立于分析方法的类型来解决这个问题。虽然经典的统计分析和建模方法为处理偏差和稀疏性提供了严格的框架,但人工智能方法并不一定适合天真地应用。从选择方法到解释结果都需要采取特别的预防措施,以防止潜在的有害谬误。也可能需要有意识地利用先前的医学主题专门知识。基于典型的应用程序示例,我们说明了挑战和方法上的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantum Hybrid Diffusion Models for Image Synthesis Large Process Models: A Vision for Business Process Management in the Age of Generative AI An ASP Implementation of Defeasible Deontic Logic Quantum Supervised Learning $$\mathrm{Q(AI)}^2$$: Quantum Artificial Intelligence for the Automotive Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1