Power and Public Administration: Applying a Transformative Approach to Freedom of/Access to Information Research

IF 1.3 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Integrity Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1080/10999922.2023.2262156
Sule Tomkinson
{"title":"Power and Public Administration: Applying a Transformative Approach to Freedom of/Access to Information Research","authors":"Sule Tomkinson","doi":"10.1080/10999922.2023.2262156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of Information (FOI) or Access to Information (ATI) legislation regulates the right to make written requests for government records. Previous research either interrogates the effectiveness of FOI/ATI legislation for advancing government transparency or positions the requests as a means for gathering data on government institutions. This article intervenes in this debate by treating FOI/ATI mechanisms as the vantage point from which to examine questions about power in public administration. Adopting a transformative approach, this article explores the potential of using FOI/ATI requests as a liberatory tool that enables the analysis of power dynamics in public administration. For this purpose, the author draws upon her experience with Canada’s ATI regime and requests from the Immigration and Refugee Board. This article documents how ATI requests reveal policy tensions within the Board related to case and performance management, as well as patterns of front-line staff resistance to these measures. It goes on to examine complaints about delays made to the ATI watchdog which expose the attribution of ATI resources towards non-ATI responsibilities. This article highlights the contribution that FOI/ATI requests can make to public administration research.","PeriodicalId":51805,"journal":{"name":"Public Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2023.2262156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Freedom of Information (FOI) or Access to Information (ATI) legislation regulates the right to make written requests for government records. Previous research either interrogates the effectiveness of FOI/ATI legislation for advancing government transparency or positions the requests as a means for gathering data on government institutions. This article intervenes in this debate by treating FOI/ATI mechanisms as the vantage point from which to examine questions about power in public administration. Adopting a transformative approach, this article explores the potential of using FOI/ATI requests as a liberatory tool that enables the analysis of power dynamics in public administration. For this purpose, the author draws upon her experience with Canada’s ATI regime and requests from the Immigration and Refugee Board. This article documents how ATI requests reveal policy tensions within the Board related to case and performance management, as well as patterns of front-line staff resistance to these measures. It goes on to examine complaints about delays made to the ATI watchdog which expose the attribution of ATI resources towards non-ATI responsibilities. This article highlights the contribution that FOI/ATI requests can make to public administration research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力与公共行政:对信息自由/获取研究的变革方法的应用
信息自由法(FOI)或信息获取法(ATI)规定了对政府记录提出书面要求的权利。先前的研究要么质疑信息自由/ATI立法在提高政府透明度方面的有效性,要么将这些要求定位为收集政府机构数据的一种手段。本文通过将FOI/ATI机制作为审视公共行政权力问题的有利视角,介入了这场辩论。本文采用一种变革性的方法,探讨了利用FOI/ATI请求作为一种解放工具的潜力,这种工具可以分析公共行政中的权力动态。为此目的,作者借鉴了她在加拿大ATI制度方面的经验以及移民和难民委员会的要求。本文记录了ATI请求如何揭示了董事会内部与案例和绩效管理有关的政策紧张局势,以及一线工作人员抵制这些措施的模式。它继续检查对ATI监督机构的延迟投诉,这些投诉暴露了ATI资源对非ATI责任的归属。本文强调了信息自由/ATI请求对公共行政研究的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Integrity
Public Integrity PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
85
期刊最新文献
The Focus and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility in the United Arab Emirates Case Studies on Diversity and Social Justice Education Advancing Disaster Resilience: The Ethical Dimensions of Adaptability and Adaptive Leadership in Public Service Organizations Measuring Transparency of State and Local Offices of Inspector General Navigating the Thin Line: Can Acts of Good Lead to Defiance at Work? Exploring the Intricacies of OCB and CWB Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1