Role of Bio-Psychosocial factors in return to work following a compensable knee injury

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION European Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1080/21679169.2023.2262518
Alicia Savona, Helen Razmjou
{"title":"Role of Bio-Psychosocial factors in return to work following a compensable knee injury","authors":"Alicia Savona, Helen Razmjou","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2023.2262518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjectives The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between work status and biomedical factors, psychosocial factors, occupational factors, physical disability, and barriers to full recovery.Methods This study was a cross sectional evaluation of workers with an active compensation claim following a work-related injury to the knee joint.Results Data of 60 consecutive injured workers, mean age, 47 ± 14, 40 (67%) males were used for analysis. Thirty-one (52%) patients were unable to work and 29 (48%) patients were working at the time of assessment. Patient’s age, gender, range of motion, and strength did not have a direct relationship with work status (p > 0.05). Obesity had a negative impact on work status (p = 0.035). Depression (p = 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.002), and the fear avoidance of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO-YF) scale (p = 0.019) showed higher levels of psychosocial issues in the non-working sample. Patients with 3 or more barriers (p = 0.020) and higher disability score (p = 0.004) showed an inferior work status.Discussion Presence of obesity, depression, anxiety, fear-related beliefs, higher reported disability, and accumulative number of barriers are indicative of poorer recovery and a less successful RTW after an occupational knee injury.Keywords: Psychosocial factorsinjured workersreturn to workdepressionanxietyknee injuriesfear avoidance behaviourcross-sectional study Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2023.2262518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractObjectives The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between work status and biomedical factors, psychosocial factors, occupational factors, physical disability, and barriers to full recovery.Methods This study was a cross sectional evaluation of workers with an active compensation claim following a work-related injury to the knee joint.Results Data of 60 consecutive injured workers, mean age, 47 ± 14, 40 (67%) males were used for analysis. Thirty-one (52%) patients were unable to work and 29 (48%) patients were working at the time of assessment. Patient’s age, gender, range of motion, and strength did not have a direct relationship with work status (p > 0.05). Obesity had a negative impact on work status (p = 0.035). Depression (p = 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.002), and the fear avoidance of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO-YF) scale (p = 0.019) showed higher levels of psychosocial issues in the non-working sample. Patients with 3 or more barriers (p = 0.020) and higher disability score (p = 0.004) showed an inferior work status.Discussion Presence of obesity, depression, anxiety, fear-related beliefs, higher reported disability, and accumulative number of barriers are indicative of poorer recovery and a less successful RTW after an occupational knee injury.Keywords: Psychosocial factorsinjured workersreturn to workdepressionanxietyknee injuriesfear avoidance behaviourcross-sectional study Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物-社会心理因素在可补偿膝关节损伤后重返工作中的作用
摘要目的探讨职业状态与生物医学因素、心理社会因素、职业因素、身体残疾和完全康复障碍的关系。方法本研究是一个横断面评估与工作有关的工人主动赔偿索赔后,工伤的膝关节。结果连续受伤工人60例,平均年龄(47±14),男性40例(67%)。31例(52%)患者无法工作,29例(48%)患者在评估时正在工作。患者的年龄、性别、活动度、力量与工作状态无直接关系(p > 0.05)。肥胖对工作状态有负向影响(p = 0.035)。抑郁(p = 0.001)、焦虑(p = 0.002)和对转诊和预后预测最佳筛查(OSPRO-YF)量表的恐惧回避(p = 0.019)显示非工作样本的社会心理问题水平较高。障碍3个及以上(p = 0.020)、残疾评分较高(p = 0.004)的患者工作状态较差。存在肥胖、抑郁、焦虑、恐惧相关的信念、较高的残疾报告和累积的障碍数量表明职业性膝关节损伤后恢复较差和RTW较不成功。关键词:心理社会因素受伤工人复工抑郁焦虑膝盖损伤恐惧回避行为横断面研究披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。其他信息资金作者报告没有与本文所述工作相关的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Utilisation of the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey. Unravelling the digital competence of students in physiotherapy education through the European digital competence framework Complementary strategies to improve the qualitative analysis: exemplified by our studies of physiotherapy in shoulder problems Beyond one size fits All - Personalised prevention strategies using physical activity: editorial Comparing treadmill and overground versions of the two-minute walk test in people with low back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1