{"title":"Role of Bio-Psychosocial factors in return to work following a compensable knee injury","authors":"Alicia Savona, Helen Razmjou","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2023.2262518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjectives The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between work status and biomedical factors, psychosocial factors, occupational factors, physical disability, and barriers to full recovery.Methods This study was a cross sectional evaluation of workers with an active compensation claim following a work-related injury to the knee joint.Results Data of 60 consecutive injured workers, mean age, 47 ± 14, 40 (67%) males were used for analysis. Thirty-one (52%) patients were unable to work and 29 (48%) patients were working at the time of assessment. Patient’s age, gender, range of motion, and strength did not have a direct relationship with work status (p > 0.05). Obesity had a negative impact on work status (p = 0.035). Depression (p = 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.002), and the fear avoidance of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO-YF) scale (p = 0.019) showed higher levels of psychosocial issues in the non-working sample. Patients with 3 or more barriers (p = 0.020) and higher disability score (p = 0.004) showed an inferior work status.Discussion Presence of obesity, depression, anxiety, fear-related beliefs, higher reported disability, and accumulative number of barriers are indicative of poorer recovery and a less successful RTW after an occupational knee injury.Keywords: Psychosocial factorsinjured workersreturn to workdepressionanxietyknee injuriesfear avoidance behaviourcross-sectional study Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2023.2262518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractObjectives The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between work status and biomedical factors, psychosocial factors, occupational factors, physical disability, and barriers to full recovery.Methods This study was a cross sectional evaluation of workers with an active compensation claim following a work-related injury to the knee joint.Results Data of 60 consecutive injured workers, mean age, 47 ± 14, 40 (67%) males were used for analysis. Thirty-one (52%) patients were unable to work and 29 (48%) patients were working at the time of assessment. Patient’s age, gender, range of motion, and strength did not have a direct relationship with work status (p > 0.05). Obesity had a negative impact on work status (p = 0.035). Depression (p = 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.002), and the fear avoidance of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO-YF) scale (p = 0.019) showed higher levels of psychosocial issues in the non-working sample. Patients with 3 or more barriers (p = 0.020) and higher disability score (p = 0.004) showed an inferior work status.Discussion Presence of obesity, depression, anxiety, fear-related beliefs, higher reported disability, and accumulative number of barriers are indicative of poorer recovery and a less successful RTW after an occupational knee injury.Keywords: Psychosocial factorsinjured workersreturn to workdepressionanxietyknee injuriesfear avoidance behaviourcross-sectional study Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.