Analysing the Relationship between Proximity to Transit Stations and Local Living Patterns: A Study of Human Mobility within a 15 Min Walking Distance through Mobile Location Data

IF 2.1 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Urban science (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.3390/urbansci7040105
I-Ting Chuang, Lee Beattie, Lei Feng
{"title":"Analysing the Relationship between Proximity to Transit Stations and Local Living Patterns: A Study of Human Mobility within a 15 Min Walking Distance through Mobile Location Data","authors":"I-Ting Chuang, Lee Beattie, Lei Feng","doi":"10.3390/urbansci7040105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban planning and transportation policies are vital to creating sustainable and liveable cities. Transit-orientated development (TOD) has emerged as a prominent approach that emphasises the establishment of neighbourhoods with convenient access to public transportation, thereby promoting car-free lifestyles. This research investigates the connection between proximity to transit stations and local living habits in Auckland, New Zealand, which is a car-dependent city aiming to transition to a sustainable TOD model. We use geolocational data from mobile phones to measure the daily mobility patterns of residents living within a 15 min walking distance of various transit stations. Employing ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, we analyse the correlation between residents’ average travel distances and individual mobility, considering different station contexts. We aim to determine whether individuals living near transit stations are more inclined to participate in local activities and make a higher proportion of short-distance trips. The results illustrate that approximately 54% of the residents show dominant localised mobility patterns. Living near a station is significantly associated with shorter annual travel distances, although this trend varies by area. Notably, only about 16 of the 34 stations studied indicate that their local residents predominantly engage in ‘local’ travel patterns. Rural stations show less correlation, likely due to poor infrastructure and limited walkability. This study underscores the vital role of proximity to transit stations in promoting sustainable mobility. It serves as a foundational guide for urban planners and designers to make informed decisions that improve the built environment and optimise land use.","PeriodicalId":75284,"journal":{"name":"Urban science (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban science (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7040105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban planning and transportation policies are vital to creating sustainable and liveable cities. Transit-orientated development (TOD) has emerged as a prominent approach that emphasises the establishment of neighbourhoods with convenient access to public transportation, thereby promoting car-free lifestyles. This research investigates the connection between proximity to transit stations and local living habits in Auckland, New Zealand, which is a car-dependent city aiming to transition to a sustainable TOD model. We use geolocational data from mobile phones to measure the daily mobility patterns of residents living within a 15 min walking distance of various transit stations. Employing ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, we analyse the correlation between residents’ average travel distances and individual mobility, considering different station contexts. We aim to determine whether individuals living near transit stations are more inclined to participate in local activities and make a higher proportion of short-distance trips. The results illustrate that approximately 54% of the residents show dominant localised mobility patterns. Living near a station is significantly associated with shorter annual travel distances, although this trend varies by area. Notably, only about 16 of the 34 stations studied indicate that their local residents predominantly engage in ‘local’ travel patterns. Rural stations show less correlation, likely due to poor infrastructure and limited walkability. This study underscores the vital role of proximity to transit stations in promoting sustainable mobility. It serves as a foundational guide for urban planners and designers to make informed decisions that improve the built environment and optimise land use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交通站点邻近度与当地生活模式的关系分析——基于移动位置数据的15分钟步行距离内人类流动性研究
城市规划和交通政策对于创建可持续和宜居的城市至关重要。以交通为导向的发展(TOD)已经成为一种突出的方法,它强调建立方便公共交通的社区,从而促进无车生活方式。本研究调查了新西兰奥克兰靠近公交车站与当地生活习惯之间的联系,奥克兰是一个依赖汽车的城市,旨在向可持续的TOD模式过渡。我们使用来自手机的地理位置数据来测量居住在各种交通站点步行15分钟范围内的居民的日常移动模式。采用普通最小二乘(OLS)回归,我们分析了居民平均出行距离与个人流动性之间的相关性,考虑了不同的车站环境。我们的目的是确定居住在中转站附近的个人是否更倾向于参加当地的活动,并且短途旅行的比例更高。结果表明,约54%的居民表现出主导的局部流动模式。住在车站附近与较短的年旅行距离显著相关,尽管这种趋势因地区而异。值得注意的是,在研究的34个站点中,只有大约16个站点表明其当地居民主要从事“本地”旅行模式。农村车站的相关性较低,可能是由于基础设施落后和步行不便。这项研究强调了靠近交通站点在促进可持续交通方面的重要作用。它是城市规划者和设计师做出明智决策、改善建筑环境和优化土地利用的基本指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mapping Deprived Urban Areas Using Open Geospatial Data and Machine Learning in Africa Developing a Qualitative Urban Green Spaces Index Applied to a Mediterranean City Strengthening Resilient Built Environments through Human Social Capital: A Path to Post-COVID-19 Recovery The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Public Transportation System of Montevideo, Uruguay: A Urban Data Analysis Approach Sociodemographic Analysis of Disability in a Highly Depopulated Rural Region: The Case of Soria, Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1