Jesse J. Norris, Joseph P. McFall, Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk
{"title":"Decision-making in terrorism sting operations: is entrapment driven by the sunk-cost effect and intergroup biases?","authors":"Jesse J. Norris, Joseph P. McFall, Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk","doi":"10.1080/18335330.2023.2266712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPrevious research has found that entrapment – inducing suspects to commit crimes they were not already predisposed to commit – is widespread in US terrorism sting operations, particularly those involving Muslims and racial minorities. To test whether the sunk cost effect and/or intergroup biases could explain decisions to authorise these operations, we conducted an experiment in which college student and MTurk participants (n = 1009) from the US and India decided whether to approve an operation featuring apparent entrapment. Sunk costs and suspect characteristics were manipulated across experimental conditions. Results for US participants (n = 792) show that high sunk costs increased approval of the operation only for relatively young participants, and only in scenarios with non-Muslim suspects. Scenarios with Muslim suspects yielded higher approval rates for participants who were confident in their decision. Indian participants (n = 217) were more likely than US participants to approve the operation and were unaffected by suspect religion and sunk costs. Results suggest that the sunk cost bias may play some role in entrapment, although other factors, such as outgroup bias, may also contribute to these decisions. The observed cross-cultural differences could result from international variations in susceptibility to the sunk cost effect, among other factors.KEYWORDS: Sunk cost biascounterterrorismundercover policingentrapmentIndiaUnited States Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This might change with a larger sample size; after all, in the 70 and above analysis, participants still had twice the odds of authorizing in the high-cost scenario.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy at the University at Buffalo, SUNY (to H. Grol-Prokopczyk) and research support funding from the Office of the Provost, SUNY Fredonia (to J. J. Norris).","PeriodicalId":37849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2023.2266712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTPrevious research has found that entrapment – inducing suspects to commit crimes they were not already predisposed to commit – is widespread in US terrorism sting operations, particularly those involving Muslims and racial minorities. To test whether the sunk cost effect and/or intergroup biases could explain decisions to authorise these operations, we conducted an experiment in which college student and MTurk participants (n = 1009) from the US and India decided whether to approve an operation featuring apparent entrapment. Sunk costs and suspect characteristics were manipulated across experimental conditions. Results for US participants (n = 792) show that high sunk costs increased approval of the operation only for relatively young participants, and only in scenarios with non-Muslim suspects. Scenarios with Muslim suspects yielded higher approval rates for participants who were confident in their decision. Indian participants (n = 217) were more likely than US participants to approve the operation and were unaffected by suspect religion and sunk costs. Results suggest that the sunk cost bias may play some role in entrapment, although other factors, such as outgroup bias, may also contribute to these decisions. The observed cross-cultural differences could result from international variations in susceptibility to the sunk cost effect, among other factors.KEYWORDS: Sunk cost biascounterterrorismundercover policingentrapmentIndiaUnited States Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This might change with a larger sample size; after all, in the 70 and above analysis, participants still had twice the odds of authorizing in the high-cost scenario.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a grant from the Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy at the University at Buffalo, SUNY (to H. Grol-Prokopczyk) and research support funding from the Office of the Provost, SUNY Fredonia (to J. J. Norris).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism (JPICT) is an international peer reviewed scholarly journal that acts as a forum for those around the world undertaking high quality research and practice in the areas of: Policing studies, Intelligence studies, Terrorism and counter terrorism studies; Cyber-policing, intelligence and terrorism. The Journal offers national, regional and international perspectives on current areas of scholarly and applied debate within these fields, while addressing the practical and theoretical issues and considerations that surround them. It aims to balance the discussion of practical realities with debates and research on relevant and significant theoretical issues. The Journal has the following major aims: To publish cutting-edge and contemporary research articles, reports and reviews on relevant topics; To publish articles that explore the interface between the areas of policing, intelligence and terrorism studies; To act as an international forum for exchange and discussion; To illustrate the nexus between theory and its practical applications and vice versa.