Digital Technology Integration Among Eastern European Companies, Based on Digital Economy and Society Index

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.7906/indecs.21.5.1
Tünde Zita Kovács, András Nábrádi, Beáta Bittner
{"title":"Digital Technology Integration Among Eastern European Companies, Based on Digital Economy and Society Index","authors":"Tünde Zita Kovács, András Nábrádi, Beáta Bittner","doi":"10.7906/indecs.21.5.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Commission has given special attention to the digital evolution of the European economy and society since the early 2000s. Starting with 2014, the Digital Economy and Society Index has become a key monitoring and assessment instrument. In 2021, the main indicators of the Digital Economy and Society Index were matched with the Digital Agenda 2030 targets, which encompass four dimensions: human capital, connectivity, digital technology integration, and digital public services. The article aims to verify the convergence amongst Member States in integrating digital technologies, which is the third dimension of the Digital Economy and Society Index yearly database. The σ-convergence analysis assessed decreased disparities in digital technology integration between Member States over time. The β-convergence analysis was used to evaluate the pace of catch-up from the initial development level. The σ-and β-convergence were not confirmed. The specific digital technology integration indicators (11) are studied to identify crucial areas that must be addressed in the future to guarantee that digital inclusion is as widespread as feasible. The present research is concentrated on the member countries that joined the EU during the Eastern enlargements. All individual indicator performance is typically behind the EU average, and as the β-convergence study indicates, the average catch-up rate is not encouraging.","PeriodicalId":54126,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.21.5.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Commission has given special attention to the digital evolution of the European economy and society since the early 2000s. Starting with 2014, the Digital Economy and Society Index has become a key monitoring and assessment instrument. In 2021, the main indicators of the Digital Economy and Society Index were matched with the Digital Agenda 2030 targets, which encompass four dimensions: human capital, connectivity, digital technology integration, and digital public services. The article aims to verify the convergence amongst Member States in integrating digital technologies, which is the third dimension of the Digital Economy and Society Index yearly database. The σ-convergence analysis assessed decreased disparities in digital technology integration between Member States over time. The β-convergence analysis was used to evaluate the pace of catch-up from the initial development level. The σ-and β-convergence were not confirmed. The specific digital technology integration indicators (11) are studied to identify crucial areas that must be addressed in the future to guarantee that digital inclusion is as widespread as feasible. The present research is concentrated on the member countries that joined the EU during the Eastern enlargements. All individual indicator performance is typically behind the EU average, and as the β-convergence study indicates, the average catch-up rate is not encouraging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于数字经济与社会指数的东欧企业数字技术整合
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of Dace-Kriging Metamodel Collapsing the Complicated/Complex Distinction: It’s Complexity all the Way Down Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity: Jan Cornelius Schmidt’s Critical-reflexive Problem-oriented Interdisciplinarity Methodological and Health Reasons for Unsuccessful Biometric Identification Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ Perceptions of the Use of Cloud Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1