Brand hate in the cosmetic industry: drugstore versus luxury make-up brands

IF 3.5 Q2 BUSINESS Young Consumers Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.1108/yc-10-2022-1624
Sharon Xin Ying Ong, Natalia Vila-Lopez
{"title":"Brand hate in the cosmetic industry: drugstore versus luxury make-up brands","authors":"Sharon Xin Ying Ong, Natalia Vila-Lopez","doi":"10.1108/yc-10-2022-1624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Marketing scholars have begun to look at negative emotions that young consumers could develop toward brands, such as brand hate. Brand hate has experienced exponential growth during the past decades in the cosmetic industry. In this frame, the purpose of this paper is to identify the weight of each of the five key drivers of brand hate and to analyze if these weights are the same (or not) for drugstore and luxury make-up brands regarding. Design/methodology/approach To carry on this paper, brand haters in the make-up industry were contacted with the help of cosmetic influencers. Participants of the online questionnaire ( N = 162) were existing young makeup consumers. They were divided into drugstore and luxury makeup brand haters by classifying their identified hated brands into either group. Findings The authors’ results showed, first, that experiential, identity, moral, deficit-value and advertising avoidance all had a positive effect on brand hate, being identity avoidance the strongest one. Second, drugstore and luxury makeup brand haters do not differ, as far as no differences were identified in the strength of each avoidance type on brand hate. Originality/value There is a gap in the literature related to the absence of work investigating brand hate in the make-up industry; moreover, studies measure whether brand hate drivers are the same (or not) for luxury brands and drugstore brands that compete in the same arena. In this framework, this research will provide a specific industry context involving young consumer opinions. Research into consumer–brand relationships has been largely focused on the positive forms, while the negative forms are still a relatively newer area of academic interest. Even more, brand hate has been investigated from a multidimensional approach linking proposals from different authors has been tested.","PeriodicalId":46660,"journal":{"name":"Young Consumers","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Young Consumers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-10-2022-1624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Marketing scholars have begun to look at negative emotions that young consumers could develop toward brands, such as brand hate. Brand hate has experienced exponential growth during the past decades in the cosmetic industry. In this frame, the purpose of this paper is to identify the weight of each of the five key drivers of brand hate and to analyze if these weights are the same (or not) for drugstore and luxury make-up brands regarding. Design/methodology/approach To carry on this paper, brand haters in the make-up industry were contacted with the help of cosmetic influencers. Participants of the online questionnaire ( N = 162) were existing young makeup consumers. They were divided into drugstore and luxury makeup brand haters by classifying their identified hated brands into either group. Findings The authors’ results showed, first, that experiential, identity, moral, deficit-value and advertising avoidance all had a positive effect on brand hate, being identity avoidance the strongest one. Second, drugstore and luxury makeup brand haters do not differ, as far as no differences were identified in the strength of each avoidance type on brand hate. Originality/value There is a gap in the literature related to the absence of work investigating brand hate in the make-up industry; moreover, studies measure whether brand hate drivers are the same (or not) for luxury brands and drugstore brands that compete in the same arena. In this framework, this research will provide a specific industry context involving young consumer opinions. Research into consumer–brand relationships has been largely focused on the positive forms, while the negative forms are still a relatively newer area of academic interest. Even more, brand hate has been investigated from a multidimensional approach linking proposals from different authors has been tested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化妆品行业的品牌仇恨:药店与奢侈化妆品品牌
目的营销学者已经开始研究年轻消费者对品牌可能产生的负面情绪,比如品牌仇恨。在过去的几十年里,化妆品行业对品牌的厌恶经历了指数级增长。在这个框架中,本文的目的是确定品牌厌恶的五个关键驱动因素的权重,并分析这些权重对于药店和奢侈化妆品牌是否相同(或不相同)。设计/方法/方法为了进行本文的研究,我们在化妆品网红的帮助下联系了化妆品行业的品牌厌恶者。在线问卷的参与者(N = 162)是现有的年轻化妆品消费者。研究人员将他们讨厌的化妆品品牌分为药店和奢侈化妆品品牌两组。研究结果表明:第一,体验、认同、道德、缺失价值和广告回避对品牌厌恶均有正向影响,其中认同回避对品牌厌恶的影响最大;其次,药店和奢侈化妆品品牌厌恶者没有差异,因为每种回避类型对品牌厌恶的强度没有差异。原创性/价值在研究化妆品行业品牌仇恨的文献中存在空白;此外,研究还衡量了在同一领域竞争的奢侈品牌和药店品牌的品牌厌恶驱动因素是否相同。在此框架下,本研究将提供涉及年轻消费者意见的特定行业背景。对消费者品牌关系的研究主要集中在积极形式,而消极形式仍然是一个相对较新的学术兴趣领域。更重要的是,品牌仇恨从多维度的角度进行了调查,不同作者的建议都经过了测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Young Consumers
Young Consumers BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
“Do you practice what you preach?” The effects of celebrities’ pro-environmental messages on social media on young adults’ pro-environmental behavior Environmental sustainability in the digital age: unraveling the effect of social media on green purchase intention Drivers of consumer trust in mHealth apps among young consumers: a socio-technical approach Do business-wide sustainability labels boost consumer trust and enhance perceptions of sustainability information quality? An experiment among Z-generation members Pure and suggestive impulse buying in mobile shopping app: shopping pattern of young consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1