Troy J. Zaremba, Robert M. Rauber, Larry Di Girolamo, Jesse R. Loveridge, Greg M. McFarquhar
{"title":"On the radar detection of cloud seeding effects in wintertime orographic cloud systems","authors":"Troy J. Zaremba, Robert M. Rauber, Larry Di Girolamo, Jesse R. Loveridge, Greg M. McFarquhar","doi":"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0154.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent studies from the Seeded and Natural Orographic Wintertime Clouds: the Idaho Experiment (SNOWIE) demonstrated definitive radar evidence of seeding signatures in winter orographic clouds during three intensive operation periods (IOPs) where the background signal from natural precipitation was weak and a radar signal attributable to seeding could be identified as traceable seeding lines. Except for the three IOPs where seeding was detected, background natural snowfall was present during seeding operations and no clear seeding signatures were detected. This paper provides a quantitative analysis to assess if orographic cloud seeding effects are detectable using radar when background precipitation is present. We show that a 5 dB change in equivalent reflectivity factor ( Z e ) is required to stand out against background natural Z e variability. This analysis considers four radar wavelengths, a range of background ice water contents (IWC) from 0.012 g m −3 to 1.214 g m −3 , and additional IWC introduced by seeding ranging from 0.012 g m −3 to 0.486 g m −3 . The upper limit values of seeded IWC are based on measurements of IWC from the Nevzorov probe employed on the University of Wyoming King Air aircraft during SNOWIE. This analysis implies that seeding effects will be undetectable using radar within background snowfall unless the background IWC is small, and the seeding effects are large. It therefore remains uncertain whether seeding had no effect on cloud microstructure, and therefore produced no signature on radar, or whether seeding did have an effect, but that effect was undetectable against the background reflectivity associated with naturally-produced precipitation.","PeriodicalId":15027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","volume":"68 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0154.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Recent studies from the Seeded and Natural Orographic Wintertime Clouds: the Idaho Experiment (SNOWIE) demonstrated definitive radar evidence of seeding signatures in winter orographic clouds during three intensive operation periods (IOPs) where the background signal from natural precipitation was weak and a radar signal attributable to seeding could be identified as traceable seeding lines. Except for the three IOPs where seeding was detected, background natural snowfall was present during seeding operations and no clear seeding signatures were detected. This paper provides a quantitative analysis to assess if orographic cloud seeding effects are detectable using radar when background precipitation is present. We show that a 5 dB change in equivalent reflectivity factor ( Z e ) is required to stand out against background natural Z e variability. This analysis considers four radar wavelengths, a range of background ice water contents (IWC) from 0.012 g m −3 to 1.214 g m −3 , and additional IWC introduced by seeding ranging from 0.012 g m −3 to 0.486 g m −3 . The upper limit values of seeded IWC are based on measurements of IWC from the Nevzorov probe employed on the University of Wyoming King Air aircraft during SNOWIE. This analysis implies that seeding effects will be undetectable using radar within background snowfall unless the background IWC is small, and the seeding effects are large. It therefore remains uncertain whether seeding had no effect on cloud microstructure, and therefore produced no signature on radar, or whether seeding did have an effect, but that effect was undetectable against the background reflectivity associated with naturally-produced precipitation.
来自人工播种和自然地形冬季云:爱达荷实验(SNOWIE)的最新研究表明,在自然降水背景信号较弱的三个集约运行期(IOPs),冬季地形云中存在播种信号的确凿雷达证据,而由播种引起的雷达信号可以被识别为可追踪的播种线。除了3个观测到播种的IOPs外,在播种过程中存在背景自然降雪,没有观测到明显的播种特征。本文提供了一个定量分析来评估当背景降水存在时,雷达是否可以探测到地形云的播撒效应。我们表明,需要等效反射率因子(ze)的5 dB变化来突出背景自然ze变率。该分析考虑了四种雷达波长,背景冰水含量(IWC)范围从0.012 g m−3到1.214 g m−3,以及通过播种引入的额外IWC范围从0.012 g m−3到0.486 g m−3。种子IWC的上限值是基于在snowwie期间怀俄明大学国王航空飞机上使用的涅佐夫探测器对IWC的测量。这一分析表明,除非背景IWC很小,而播种效应很大,否则在背景降雪中雷达无法探测到播种效应。因此,仍然不确定是否人工播种对云的微观结构没有影响,因此在雷达上没有产生信号,或者是否人工播种确实有影响,但这种影响在与自然产生的降水相关的背景反射率下无法检测到。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (JAMC) (ISSN: 1558-8424; eISSN: 1558-8432) publishes applied research on meteorology and climatology. Examples of meteorological research include topics such as weather modification, satellite meteorology, radar meteorology, boundary layer processes, physical meteorology, air pollution meteorology (including dispersion and chemical processes), agricultural and forest meteorology, mountain meteorology, and applied meteorological numerical models. Examples of climatological research include the use of climate information in impact assessments, dynamical and statistical downscaling, seasonal climate forecast applications and verification, climate risk and vulnerability, development of climate monitoring tools, and urban and local climates.