Early Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis using an XG-Boost model applied to MRI images

IF 0.6 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomedical Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.15419/bmrat.v10i9.832
Khoi Nguyen, My Nguyen, Khiet Dang, Bao Pham, Vy Huynh, Toi Vo, Lua Ngo, Huong Ha
{"title":"Early Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis using an XG-Boost model applied to MRI images","authors":"Khoi Nguyen, My Nguyen, Khiet Dang, Bao Pham, Vy Huynh, Toi Vo, Lua Ngo, Huong Ha","doi":"10.15419/bmrat.v10i9.832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Early Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis is critical to improving the success of new treatments in clinical trials, especially at the early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI) stage. This study aimed to tackle this problem by developing an accurate classification model for early AD detection at the EMCI stage based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: This study developed the proposed classification model through a machine-learning pipeline with three main steps. First, features were extracted from MRI images using FreeSurfer. Second, the extracted features were filtered using principal component analysis (PCA), backward elimination (BE), and extreme gradient (XG)-Boost importance (XGBI), the efficiency of which was evaluated. Finally, the selected features were combined with cognitive scores (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] and Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]) to create an XG-Boost three-class classifier: AD vs. EMCI vs. cognitively normal (CN). Results: The MMSE and CDR had the highest importance weights, followed by the thickness of the left superior temporal sulcus and banks of the superior temporal lobe. Without feature selection, the model had the lowest accuracy of 69.0%. After feature selection and the addition of cognitive scores, the accuracy of the PCA, BE, and XGBI approaches improved to 74.0%, 90.9%, and 91.5%, respectively. The BE with tuning parameters model was chosen as the final model since it had the highest accuracy of 92.0%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CN, AD, and EMCI classes were 0.98, 0.94, and 0.88, respectively. Conclusion: Our proposed model shows promise in early AD diagnosis and can be fine-tuned in the future through testing on a multi-dataset.","PeriodicalId":8870,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Research and Therapy","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15419/bmrat.v10i9.832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis is critical to improving the success of new treatments in clinical trials, especially at the early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI) stage. This study aimed to tackle this problem by developing an accurate classification model for early AD detection at the EMCI stage based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: This study developed the proposed classification model through a machine-learning pipeline with three main steps. First, features were extracted from MRI images using FreeSurfer. Second, the extracted features were filtered using principal component analysis (PCA), backward elimination (BE), and extreme gradient (XG)-Boost importance (XGBI), the efficiency of which was evaluated. Finally, the selected features were combined with cognitive scores (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] and Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]) to create an XG-Boost three-class classifier: AD vs. EMCI vs. cognitively normal (CN). Results: The MMSE and CDR had the highest importance weights, followed by the thickness of the left superior temporal sulcus and banks of the superior temporal lobe. Without feature selection, the model had the lowest accuracy of 69.0%. After feature selection and the addition of cognitive scores, the accuracy of the PCA, BE, and XGBI approaches improved to 74.0%, 90.9%, and 91.5%, respectively. The BE with tuning parameters model was chosen as the final model since it had the highest accuracy of 92.0%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CN, AD, and EMCI classes were 0.98, 0.94, and 0.88, respectively. Conclusion: Our proposed model shows promise in early AD diagnosis and can be fine-tuned in the future through testing on a multi-dataset.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用MRI图像的XG-Boost模型诊断早期阿尔茨海默病
在临床试验中,早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断对于提高新疗法的成功率至关重要,尤其是在早期轻度认知障碍(EMCI)阶段。本研究旨在通过建立基于磁共振成像(MRI)的EMCI阶段早期AD检测的准确分类模型来解决这一问题。方法:本研究通过三个主要步骤的机器学习管道开发了所提出的分类模型。首先,使用FreeSurfer从MRI图像中提取特征。其次,使用主成分分析(PCA)、反向消除(BE)和极端梯度(XG)-Boost重要性(XGBI)对提取的特征进行过滤,并对其效率进行评估。最后,将选择的特征与认知评分(迷你精神状态检查[MMSE]和临床痴呆评分[CDR])相结合,创建XG-Boost三级分类器:AD、EMCI和认知正常(CN)。结果:MMSE和CDR的重要性权重最高,其次是左侧颞上沟厚度和颞上叶壁厚度。在没有特征选择的情况下,模型的准确率最低,为69.0%。经过特征选择和认知分数的加入,PCA、BE和XGBI方法的准确率分别提高到74.0%、90.9%和91.5%。选择带参数调优的BE模型作为最终模型,其准确率最高,达到92.0%。CN类、AD类和EMCI类的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.98、0.94和0.88。结论:我们提出的模型在早期AD诊断中显示出希望,并且可以在未来通过多数据集的测试进行微调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Research and Therapy
Biomedical Research and Therapy MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors: A Report of 162 Cases Statin-associated new-onset diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance: a 30-year bibliometric study (1992-2022) Remarkable and Prolonged Response to Melphalan and High-Dose Dexamethasone Combined Therapy of a Patient with Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis Association Between Anisometropia and Amblyopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study Teucrium montanum extract drives effector and memory differentiation of CD8+ T cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1