Long-term organic fertilisers application increase plant autotrophic, soil heterotrophic respiration and net ecosystem carbon budget in a hillslope agroecosystem

Keke Hua, Wenbo Yang, Bo Zhu
{"title":"Long-term organic fertilisers application increase plant autotrophic, soil heterotrophic respiration and net ecosystem carbon budget in a hillslope agroecosystem","authors":"Keke Hua, Wenbo Yang, Bo Zhu","doi":"10.17221/245/2023-pse","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of long-term various organic fertilisers application on ecosystem respiration components and net carbon budget have rarely been investigated in a hillslope agricultural ecosystem. Hence, we measured the rates of plant autotrophic (<i>R</i><sub>a</sub>) and soil heterotrophic respiration (<i>R</i><sub>h</sub>) from 2011 to 2012 with five treatments: no fertiliser (CK); mineral fertiliser (MF); MF combined with swine manure (MFS); MF combined with crop straw (MFC), and swine manure (SM). Our results confirm that <i>R</i><sub>a</sub> was found to be more temperature-moisture sensitive than <i>R</i><sub>h</sub>, whereas <i>R</i><sub>h</sub> was more temperature sensitive than <i>R</i><sub>a</sub>. Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) is a major factor influencing the temperature sensitivity coefficient of Rh (<i>Q</i><sub>10</sub>), thereby application of organic fertilisers combined with mineral fertilisers (MFS and MFC) significantly increased annual by 19.3% and 17.2% compared with MF treatment. Annual carbon emissions via <i>R</i><sub>h</sub> and <i>R</i><sub>a</sub> under MFS, MFC and SM treatments were increased by 24.6, 28.5, 48.8% and 6.6, 10.6, 1.8%, respectively compared with MF treatment (4.6 and 23.2 t C/ha/year). Net primary production (NPP) under MFS, MFC and SM treatments were increased by 5.4, 6.01, and 15.6% relative to MF treatment (13.6 t C/ha/year), respectively, and the corresponding net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB) increased by 121.2, 172.8, and 342.4%. Our findings establish that long-term organic fertilisers application increase plant autotrophic, heterotrophic respiration and net ecosystem carbon budget, which can increase the carbon sink function. Overall, crop straw combined with mineral fertiliser is a feasible agronomy practice to increase carbon sink function, reduce soil erosion and maintain crop yield.","PeriodicalId":20244,"journal":{"name":"Plant Soil and Environment","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Soil and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/245/2023-pse","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of long-term various organic fertilisers application on ecosystem respiration components and net carbon budget have rarely been investigated in a hillslope agricultural ecosystem. Hence, we measured the rates of plant autotrophic (Ra) and soil heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from 2011 to 2012 with five treatments: no fertiliser (CK); mineral fertiliser (MF); MF combined with swine manure (MFS); MF combined with crop straw (MFC), and swine manure (SM). Our results confirm that Ra was found to be more temperature-moisture sensitive than Rh, whereas Rh was more temperature sensitive than Ra. Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) is a major factor influencing the temperature sensitivity coefficient of Rh (Q10), thereby application of organic fertilisers combined with mineral fertilisers (MFS and MFC) significantly increased annual by 19.3% and 17.2% compared with MF treatment. Annual carbon emissions via Rh and Ra under MFS, MFC and SM treatments were increased by 24.6, 28.5, 48.8% and 6.6, 10.6, 1.8%, respectively compared with MF treatment (4.6 and 23.2 t C/ha/year). Net primary production (NPP) under MFS, MFC and SM treatments were increased by 5.4, 6.01, and 15.6% relative to MF treatment (13.6 t C/ha/year), respectively, and the corresponding net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB) increased by 121.2, 172.8, and 342.4%. Our findings establish that long-term organic fertilisers application increase plant autotrophic, heterotrophic respiration and net ecosystem carbon budget, which can increase the carbon sink function. Overall, crop straw combined with mineral fertiliser is a feasible agronomy practice to increase carbon sink function, reduce soil erosion and maintain crop yield.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期施用有机肥增加了坡地农业生态系统植物自养、土壤异养呼吸和生态系统净碳收支
长期施用各种有机肥对坡地农业生态系统呼吸组分和净碳收支的影响研究较少。因此,我们测量了2011 - 2012年5个处理下植物自养呼吸速率(Ra)和土壤异养呼吸速率(Rh):不施肥(CK);矿物肥料;MF与猪粪复合(MFS);与农作物秸秆(MFC)、猪粪(SM)复合。我们的结果证实,Ra比Rh对温度湿度更敏感,而Rh比Ra对温度更敏感。土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)是影响Rh (Q10)温度敏感系数的主要因素,因此有机肥与矿肥(MFS和MFC)配施较MF处理每年显著提高19.3%和17.2%。MFS、MFC和SM处理的Rh和Ra年碳排放量分别比MF处理(4.6和23.2 t C/ha/年)增加24.6%、28.5%、48.8%和6.6、10.6、1.8%。MFS、MFC和SM处理的净初级产量(NPP)分别比MF处理(13.6 t C/ha/年)增加了5.4、6.01和15.6%,相应的净生态系统碳收支(NECB)分别增加了121.2、172.8和342.4%。研究结果表明,长期施用有机肥增加了植物自养、异养呼吸和生态系统净碳收支,从而增加了碳汇功能。综上所述,作物秸秆配施矿肥是增加碳汇功能、减少水土流失、保持作物产量的可行农艺做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The potential of glyphosate-alternatives like electrophysical weeding in the stale seedbed method for Alopecurus myosuroides (Huds.) control Putrescine improves salt tolerance of wheat seedlings by regulating ascorbate and glutathione metabolism, photosynthetic performance, and ion homeostasis Effects of exogenous ascorbic acid on photosynthesis and xanthophyll cycle in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) under drought and heat stress Assessment of the effect of optimised field plot size on the crop yield Inoculation with Bacillus alters nitrogen uptake and metabolism in roots of Diospyros lotus under wheat straw addition in soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1