The experience of hurt in the deepest part of self; a phenomenological study in young people with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Qualitative Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1108/qrj-06-2023-0107
Soudeh AghaMohammadi, Mohammad Ali Mazaheri, Ladan Fata, Fereshteh Mootabi, Basir Moghadasiyan
{"title":"The experience of hurt in the deepest part of self; a phenomenological study in young people with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)","authors":"Soudeh AghaMohammadi, Mohammad Ali Mazaheri, Ladan Fata, Fereshteh Mootabi, Basir Moghadasiyan","doi":"10.1108/qrj-06-2023-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWhat is happening in the perceived world of young people who have non-suicidal self-injury? The answer to this question explains many quantitative research findings in the field of NSSI. The current qualitative research design is Husserl's descriptive phenomenology.Design/methodology/approachThe participants included 17–29-year-old youths with self-injury and were selected with a targeted sampling approach and a conspicuous sampling method based on the theoretical saturation criterion of 21 people. Data were collected in a semi-structured interview and analyzed in the MAXQDA2022 software using the Attride-Stirling (2001) method. Validation of data was done by the method of simultaneous review of colleagues and simultaneous review of participants.FindingsThe themes emerging from the analysis of the findings are the three organizing themes of “vulnerable temperament” which includes height and head, high pain sensitivity threshold and desire for nothingness, “traumatic family” which includes disorganization, crisis and devaluation in the family and “developmental injuries” that are associated with physical, sexual and emotional abuse and neglect. The content of these themes seriously harms a person's self-perception through the emotions of fear, shame, anger and despair and is integrated into the overarching theme of “damaged self”.Originality/value“Damaged Self” provides causal explanations related to the formation of self-injurious behaviors and these behaviors are in harmony with the damage that a person observes in his perception of himself.","PeriodicalId":47040,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-06-2023-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeWhat is happening in the perceived world of young people who have non-suicidal self-injury? The answer to this question explains many quantitative research findings in the field of NSSI. The current qualitative research design is Husserl's descriptive phenomenology.Design/methodology/approachThe participants included 17–29-year-old youths with self-injury and were selected with a targeted sampling approach and a conspicuous sampling method based on the theoretical saturation criterion of 21 people. Data were collected in a semi-structured interview and analyzed in the MAXQDA2022 software using the Attride-Stirling (2001) method. Validation of data was done by the method of simultaneous review of colleagues and simultaneous review of participants.FindingsThe themes emerging from the analysis of the findings are the three organizing themes of “vulnerable temperament” which includes height and head, high pain sensitivity threshold and desire for nothingness, “traumatic family” which includes disorganization, crisis and devaluation in the family and “developmental injuries” that are associated with physical, sexual and emotional abuse and neglect. The content of these themes seriously harms a person's self-perception through the emotions of fear, shame, anger and despair and is integrated into the overarching theme of “damaged self”.Originality/value“Damaged Self” provides causal explanations related to the formation of self-injurious behaviors and these behaviors are in harmony with the damage that a person observes in his perception of himself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在自我最深处受到伤害的体验;青少年非自杀性自伤的现象学研究
在那些有非自杀性自残行为的年轻人的感知世界中发生了什么?这个问题的答案解释了许多自伤领域的定量研究结果。当前的定性研究设计是胡塞尔的描述现象学。设计/方法/方法选取17 - 29岁有自伤倾向的青少年为研究对象,采用定向抽样法和显著抽样法,以21人的理论饱和标准为基础。采用半结构化访谈法收集数据,并采用Attride-Stirling(2001)方法在MAXQDA2022软件中进行分析。数据的验证采用同事同步评审和参与者同步评审的方法进行。通过对调查结果的分析得出的主题是“脆弱气质”的三个组织主题,包括身高和头部、高疼痛敏感阈值和对虚无的渴望;“创伤性家庭”的三个组织主题,包括家庭的混乱、危机和贬值;“发展性伤害”的三个组织主题,包括身体、性和情感虐待和忽视。这些主题的内容通过恐惧、羞耻、愤怒和绝望等情绪严重伤害了一个人的自我认知,并融入了“受损自我”的总体主题。原创性/价值“受损自我”提供了与自我伤害行为形成相关的因果解释,这些行为与一个人在他对自己的感知中观察到的伤害是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Research Journal
Qualitative Research Journal SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research Journal (QRJ) is an international journal devoted to the communication of the theory and practice of qualitative research in the human sciences. It is interdisciplinary and eclectic, covering all methodologies that can be described as qualitative. It offers an international forum for researchers and practitioners to advance knowledge and promote good qualitative research practices. QRJ deals comprehensively with the collection, analysis and presentation of qualitative data in the human sciences as well as theoretical and conceptual inquiry.
期刊最新文献
Home–school interactions relating to students with disability: a document analysis of Australian policy and guidelines Entrepreneurial mindset strategies in times of crisis: a qualitative study on street food vendors Métissage – somewhere between hope and happening The door opens inward: meeting Linda Tuhiwai Smith Relationships with horses and humans: Smith’s legacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1