Symbiotic Interactions of Archaea in Animal and Human Microbiomes

IF 3.1 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Current Clinical Microbiology Reports Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1007/s40588-023-00204-7
Nancy Weiland-Bräuer
{"title":"Symbiotic Interactions of Archaea in Animal and Human Microbiomes","authors":"Nancy Weiland-Bräuer","doi":"10.1007/s40588-023-00204-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose of Review Since the introduction of Archaea as a new domain of life more than 45 years ago, progress in their phylogenetic classification and knowledge of their exclusive biological characteristics has identified archaea as unique microorganisms which are widespread in extreme but also in various moderate ecosystems, including eukaryotic hosts. However, archaea are still neglected players within microbiomes, and research on archaea-bacteria interactions is still in its infancy due to methodological challenges. Recent Findings This review summarizes the current knowledge of archaea as components within microbiomes and focuses on their interactions with their bacterial neighbors and the principles of archaeal interactions. Summary Archaea are common constituents of animal and human microbiomes, which are dominated by Euryarchaeota. The gastrointestinal tract is the most studied body site, where archaea account for up to 4% of all microorganisms, primarily represented by methanogens. No archaeal pathogen has yet been identified, although methanogens are hypothesized to be indirectly involved in pathogenicity. Archaeal interactions comprise symbiotic relationships, and the cell membrane and wall might be as crucial as quorum sensing/quenching for these interactions. Particularly, syntrophic interactions under energy-deficiency stress seem to be an essential strategy for archaea. However, more research is urgently needed to discover how archaea sense their environment, compete with bacteria, and interact within complex microbiomes associated with multicellular organisms.","PeriodicalId":45506,"journal":{"name":"Current Clinical Microbiology Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Clinical Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-023-00204-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Since the introduction of Archaea as a new domain of life more than 45 years ago, progress in their phylogenetic classification and knowledge of their exclusive biological characteristics has identified archaea as unique microorganisms which are widespread in extreme but also in various moderate ecosystems, including eukaryotic hosts. However, archaea are still neglected players within microbiomes, and research on archaea-bacteria interactions is still in its infancy due to methodological challenges. Recent Findings This review summarizes the current knowledge of archaea as components within microbiomes and focuses on their interactions with their bacterial neighbors and the principles of archaeal interactions. Summary Archaea are common constituents of animal and human microbiomes, which are dominated by Euryarchaeota. The gastrointestinal tract is the most studied body site, where archaea account for up to 4% of all microorganisms, primarily represented by methanogens. No archaeal pathogen has yet been identified, although methanogens are hypothesized to be indirectly involved in pathogenicity. Archaeal interactions comprise symbiotic relationships, and the cell membrane and wall might be as crucial as quorum sensing/quenching for these interactions. Particularly, syntrophic interactions under energy-deficiency stress seem to be an essential strategy for archaea. However, more research is urgently needed to discover how archaea sense their environment, compete with bacteria, and interact within complex microbiomes associated with multicellular organisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古生菌在动物和人类微生物群中的共生相互作用
自古生菌作为一种新的生命领域被引入以来,随着其系统发育分类和对其特有生物学特性的了解的进展,古生菌作为一种独特的微生物广泛存在于极端生态系统中,但也存在于包括真核宿主在内的各种中等生态系统中。然而,古生菌仍然是微生物组中被忽视的参与者,由于方法上的挑战,古生菌与细菌相互作用的研究仍处于起步阶段。本文综述了古细菌作为微生物组的组成部分的现有知识,重点介绍了它们与邻近细菌的相互作用以及古细菌相互作用的原理。古生菌是动物和人类微生物群的共同组成部分,以Euryarchaeota为主。胃肠道是研究最多的身体部位,其中古生菌占所有微生物的4%,主要以产甲烷菌为代表。虽然假设产甲烷菌间接参与致病性,但尚未发现古细菌病原体。古菌相互作用包括共生关系,细胞膜和细胞壁可能对这些相互作用至关重要,就像群体感应/淬灭一样。特别是,能量缺乏胁迫下的共生相互作用似乎是古菌的基本策略。然而,迫切需要更多的研究来发现古细菌如何感知环境,与细菌竞争,以及在与多细胞生物相关的复杂微生物群中相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.90%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Current Clinical Microbiology Reports commissions expert reviews from leading scientists at the forefront of research in microbiology. The journal covers this broad field by dividing it into four key main areas of study: virology, bacteriology, parasitology, and mycology. Within each of the four sections, experts from around the world address important aspects of clinical microbiology such as immunology, diagnostics, therapeutics, antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, and vaccines. Some of the world’s foremost authorities in the field of microbiology serve as section editors and editorial board members. Section editors select topics for which leading researchers are invited to contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, which are highlighted in annotated reference lists. These timely reviews of the literature examine the latest scientific discoveries and controversies as they emerge and are indispensable to both researchers and clinicians. The editorial board, composed of more than 20 internationally diverse members, reviews the annual table of contents, ensures that topics address all aspects of emerging research, and where applicable suggests topics of critical importance to various countries/regions.
期刊最新文献
SARS-CoV-2 Resistance to Small Molecule Inhibitors. Integrating Genomic Data with the Development of CRISPR-Based Point-of-Care-Testing for Bacterial Infections. Intimate Relationship Between Stress and Human Alpha‑Herpes Virus 1 (HSV‑1) Reactivation from Latency. Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis: Current Trends in Its Diagnosis and Management Engineered Therapeutic Antibody Against SARS-CoV-2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1