Do livelihood strategies affect the willingness to participate in land conservation? The case of landless people in rural Tigray

IF 2.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Environment Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1080/27658511.2023.2277559
Haftu Etsay, Abeba Kelelew, Sehin Kinfu, Melaku Berhe
{"title":"Do livelihood strategies affect the willingness to participate in land conservation? The case of landless people in rural Tigray","authors":"Haftu Etsay, Abeba Kelelew, Sehin Kinfu, Melaku Berhe","doi":"10.1080/27658511.2023.2277559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communal land-based resources are an essential source of livelihood in the rural economy of Ethiopia. In particular, the dependence of the landless people on the direct use of communal natural resources for their livelihoods jeopardizes both the resources they depend on and economic opportunities. To overcome such challenges, conservation of communal natural resources through collective action while addressing the food security problem has been described as one of the most appropriate resource management approaches. Thus, this paper explores how the livelihood strategies of landless people influence their willingness to participate in the conservation of natural resources. The study was conducted in five administrative districts in the Tigray region of northern Ethiopia. The findings of this paper are based on the cross-sectional data collected through structured questionnaires from 324 randomly selected landless households. This study extends the previous analyses by introducing a new method of analytical tool, particularly in modeling rural people’s willingness to participate in conservation. The results of ordered probit regression show that a higher level of willingness to conserve natural resources is observed if the household has access to farmland and harness resources generated in protected lands but with no access to artisanal mining and quarries. The study hence concludes that granting landless rural people access to farming activities and allowing them to reap economic benefits generated in protected lands promotes their participation in the conservation of natural resources.","PeriodicalId":29858,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment","volume":"103 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2023.2277559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communal land-based resources are an essential source of livelihood in the rural economy of Ethiopia. In particular, the dependence of the landless people on the direct use of communal natural resources for their livelihoods jeopardizes both the resources they depend on and economic opportunities. To overcome such challenges, conservation of communal natural resources through collective action while addressing the food security problem has been described as one of the most appropriate resource management approaches. Thus, this paper explores how the livelihood strategies of landless people influence their willingness to participate in the conservation of natural resources. The study was conducted in five administrative districts in the Tigray region of northern Ethiopia. The findings of this paper are based on the cross-sectional data collected through structured questionnaires from 324 randomly selected landless households. This study extends the previous analyses by introducing a new method of analytical tool, particularly in modeling rural people’s willingness to participate in conservation. The results of ordered probit regression show that a higher level of willingness to conserve natural resources is observed if the household has access to farmland and harness resources generated in protected lands but with no access to artisanal mining and quarries. The study hence concludes that granting landless rural people access to farming activities and allowing them to reap economic benefits generated in protected lands promotes their participation in the conservation of natural resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生计策略是否会影响参与土地保育的意愿?提格雷农村无地人口的案例
公共土地资源是埃塞俄比亚农村经济的重要生计来源。特别是,无地人民依赖直接利用公共自然资源来维持生计,这既危及他们所依赖的资源,也危及他们的经济机会。为了克服这些挑战,在解决粮食安全问题的同时,通过集体行动保护公共自然资源被认为是最适当的资源管理办法之一。因此,本文探讨了失地者的生计策略如何影响他们参与自然资源保护的意愿。这项研究是在埃塞俄比亚北部提格雷地区的五个行政区进行的。本文的研究结果是基于随机抽取的324户失地家庭的结构化问卷收集的横截面数据。本研究扩展了以往的分析,引入了一种新的分析工具方法,特别是在农村居民参与保护意愿的建模方面。有序probit回归的结果表明,如果家庭可以获得农田和利用受保护土地上产生的资源,但无法获得手工采矿和采石场,则可以观察到更高水平的自然资源保护意愿。因此,这项研究得出的结论是,让无地农村人口有机会从事农业活动,并允许他们获得在受保护土地上产生的经济利益,可以促进他们参与自然资源的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Environment
Sustainable Environment ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Exploring loss and damage from climate change and global perspectives that influence response mechanism in vulnerable communities Exploring knowledge, attitudes and practices of farmers at the edge of Budongo forest on agrochemicals usage Pesticides in use, their application and risks on human health and ecosystems: A case of Fogera District, Ethiopia Hidden hazards in urban soils: A meta-analysis review of global heavy metal contamination (2010-2022), sources and its Ecological and health consequences Do innovation, financial development and institutional quality matter in managing carbon risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1