Anger Expressions of Bus Drivers and Passengers during Conflicts on the Bus

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Research Record Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1177/03611981231170008
Shi Ye, Qun Chen, Yi Tang
{"title":"Anger Expressions of Bus Drivers and Passengers during Conflicts on the Bus","authors":"Shi Ye, Qun Chen, Yi Tang","doi":"10.1177/03611981231170008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conflicts often occur between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers, leading to dangerous situations while driving. However, tools to explore drivers’ and passengers’ forms of anger expression are lacking. This paper describes the development of a bus passenger anger expression inventory (BPAX) and a bus driver anger expression inventory (BDAX) based on a 402 passenger sample and a 414 driver sample. Exploratory principal component analysis revealed five factors in the BPAX: verbal aggressive expression, verbal positive expression, personal physical aggressive expression, adaptive/constructive expression, and displaced aggression. Similarly, six factors were identified in the BDAX: verbal positive expression, use of the vehicle to express anger, verbal aggressive expression, adaptive/constructive expression, personal physical aggressive expression, and displaced aggression. Overall, gender showed a difference only in aggressive expressions of passenger anger, not in drivers’ anger expressions. Older, less educated, and lower-income passengers preferred to express anger aggressively and rarely relieved conflicts in a positive verbal way. For driver groups, differences in age, anger level, and city grade were reflected in their forms of anger expression. The results of this paper are significant for strengthening driver safety training, improving safety facilities in buses, enhancing passenger education on civilized riding, and perfecting laws and regulations.","PeriodicalId":23279,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231170008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflicts often occur between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers, leading to dangerous situations while driving. However, tools to explore drivers’ and passengers’ forms of anger expression are lacking. This paper describes the development of a bus passenger anger expression inventory (BPAX) and a bus driver anger expression inventory (BDAX) based on a 402 passenger sample and a 414 driver sample. Exploratory principal component analysis revealed five factors in the BPAX: verbal aggressive expression, verbal positive expression, personal physical aggressive expression, adaptive/constructive expression, and displaced aggression. Similarly, six factors were identified in the BDAX: verbal positive expression, use of the vehicle to express anger, verbal aggressive expression, adaptive/constructive expression, personal physical aggressive expression, and displaced aggression. Overall, gender showed a difference only in aggressive expressions of passenger anger, not in drivers’ anger expressions. Older, less educated, and lower-income passengers preferred to express anger aggressively and rarely relieved conflicts in a positive verbal way. For driver groups, differences in age, anger level, and city grade were reflected in their forms of anger expression. The results of this paper are significant for strengthening driver safety training, improving safety facilities in buses, enhancing passenger education on civilized riding, and perfecting laws and regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴士司机和乘客在巴士冲突中的愤怒表情
公交车司机和乘客之间或乘客之间经常发生冲突,导致驾驶过程中的危险情况。然而,目前还缺乏探索司机和乘客愤怒表达方式的工具。本文介绍了基于402名乘客样本和414名司机样本的公共汽车乘客愤怒表达量表(BPAX)和公共汽车司机愤怒表达量表(BDAX)的开发。探索性主成分分析揭示了言语攻击表达、言语积极表达、个人肢体攻击表达、适应性/建设性表达和迁移性攻击五个影响BPAX的因素。同样,在BDAX中确定了六个因素:言语积极表达、使用工具表达愤怒、言语攻击性表达、适应性/建设性表达、个人身体攻击性表达和转移性攻击。总体而言,性别只在乘客愤怒的攻击性表达上存在差异,而在司机的愤怒表达上没有差异。年龄较大、受教育程度较低和收入较低的乘客更喜欢积极地表达愤怒,很少用积极的语言方式来缓解冲突。对于司机群体来说,年龄、愤怒程度和城市等级的差异反映在他们的愤怒表达形式上。本文的研究结果对于加强驾驶员安全培训、完善公交车安全设施、加强乘客文明乘车教育、完善法律法规具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Record
Transportation Research Record 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
918
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board is one of the most cited and prolific transportation journals in the world, offering unparalleled depth and breadth in the coverage of transportation-related topics. The TRR publishes approximately 70 issues annually of outstanding, peer-reviewed papers presenting research findings in policy, planning, administration, economics and financing, operations, construction, design, maintenance, safety, and more, for all modes of transportation. This site provides electronic access to a full compilation of papers since the 1996 series.
期刊最新文献
Acute Bilateral Optic Neuropathy: A Rare Presentation of Wernicke Encephalopathy. Simulation Study of Pedestrians Evacuation Considering Aggressive Behavior Analyzing Freeway Safety Influencing Factors Using the CatBoost Model and Interpretable Machine-Learning Framework, SHAP Numerical Analysis of Error From Sampling of Alternatives in Logit-Based Demand Forecasting Models with Massive Choice Sets Bus Operation Safety Business Intelligence Solution: Applying Analytics for Key Performance Indicator, Investigation, and Targeted Actions Analyses with a Centralized Data Warehouse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1