Towards a standardised cross-sectoral data access agreement template for research: a core set of principles for data access within trusted research environments

Rachel Brophy, Ester Bellavia, Maeve Groot Bluemink, Katharine Evans, Munisa Hashimi, Yemi Macaulay, Edel McNamara, Allison Noble, Paola Quattroni, Amanda Rudczenko, Andrew D Morris, Cassie Smith, Andy Boyd
{"title":"Towards a standardised cross-sectoral data access agreement template for research: a core set of principles for data access within trusted research environments","authors":"Rachel Brophy, Ester Bellavia, Maeve Groot Bluemink, Katharine Evans, Munisa Hashimi, Yemi Macaulay, Edel McNamara, Allison Noble, Paola Quattroni, Amanda Rudczenko, Andrew D Morris, Cassie Smith, Andy Boyd","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i4.2169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionTrusted Research Environments (TREs) are secure computing environments that provide access to data for approved researchers to use in studies that can save and improve lives. TREs rely on Data Access Agreements (DAAs) to bind researchers and their organisations to the terms and conditions of accessing the infrastructure and data use. However, DAAs can be overly lengthy, complex, and can contain outdated terms from historical data sharing agreements for physical exchange of data. This is often cited as a cause of significant delays to legal review and research projects starting. ObjectivesThe aim was to develop a standardised DAA optimised for data science in TREs across the UK and framed around the `Five Safes framework' for trustworthy data use. The DAA is underpinned by principles of data access in TREs, the development of which is described in this paper. MethodsThe Pan-UK Data Governance Steering Group of the UK Health Data Research Alliance led the development of a core set of data access principles. This was informed by a benchmarking exercise of DAAs used by established TREs and consultation with public members and stakeholders. ResultsWe have defined a core set of principles for TRE data access that can be mapped to a common set of DAA terms for UK-based TREs. Flexibility will be ensured by including terms specific to TREs or specific data/data owners in customisable annexes. Public views obtained through public involvement and engagement (PIE) activities are also reported. ConclusionsThese principles provide the foundation for a standardised UK TRE DAA template, designed to support the growing ecosystem of TREs. By providing a familiar structure and terms, this template aims to build trust among data owners and the UK public and to provide clarity to researchers on their obligations to protect the data. Widespread adoption is intended to accelerate health data research by enabling faster approval of projects, ultimately enabling more timely and effective research.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i4.2169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionTrusted Research Environments (TREs) are secure computing environments that provide access to data for approved researchers to use in studies that can save and improve lives. TREs rely on Data Access Agreements (DAAs) to bind researchers and their organisations to the terms and conditions of accessing the infrastructure and data use. However, DAAs can be overly lengthy, complex, and can contain outdated terms from historical data sharing agreements for physical exchange of data. This is often cited as a cause of significant delays to legal review and research projects starting. ObjectivesThe aim was to develop a standardised DAA optimised for data science in TREs across the UK and framed around the `Five Safes framework' for trustworthy data use. The DAA is underpinned by principles of data access in TREs, the development of which is described in this paper. MethodsThe Pan-UK Data Governance Steering Group of the UK Health Data Research Alliance led the development of a core set of data access principles. This was informed by a benchmarking exercise of DAAs used by established TREs and consultation with public members and stakeholders. ResultsWe have defined a core set of principles for TRE data access that can be mapped to a common set of DAA terms for UK-based TREs. Flexibility will be ensured by including terms specific to TREs or specific data/data owners in customisable annexes. Public views obtained through public involvement and engagement (PIE) activities are also reported. ConclusionsThese principles provide the foundation for a standardised UK TRE DAA template, designed to support the growing ecosystem of TREs. By providing a familiar structure and terms, this template aims to build trust among data owners and the UK public and to provide clarity to researchers on their obligations to protect the data. Widespread adoption is intended to accelerate health data research by enabling faster approval of projects, ultimately enabling more timely and effective research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为研究建立标准化的跨部门数据访问协议模板:在可信的研究环境中数据访问的一套核心原则
可信研究环境(TREs)是一种安全的计算环境,为获得批准的研究人员提供数据访问,用于可以拯救和改善生命的研究。TREs依靠数据访问协议(DAAs)来约束研究人员及其组织访问基础设施和数据使用的条款和条件。然而,daa可能过于冗长、复杂,并且可能包含用于物理数据交换的历史数据共享协议中的过时术语。这通常被认为是法律审查和研究项目启动严重延误的原因。目的是开发一个标准化的DAA,优化整个英国的TREs数据科学,并围绕“五个安全框架”构建可靠的数据使用。DAA以TREs中的数据访问原则为基础,本文对其发展进行了描述。方法英国健康数据研究联盟的泛英国数据治理指导小组领导制定了一套核心数据访问原则。这是通过对已建立的技术服务中心使用的daa进行基准测试,并与公众成员和利益相关者进行磋商得出的结论。结果我们已经定义了一组核心原则,用于TRE数据访问,这些原则可以映射到一组通用的DAA术语,用于基于英国的TRE。通过在可定制的附件中包括特定于TREs或特定数据/数据所有者的条款,将确保灵活性。此外,亦报告透过公众参与和参与活动所取得的公众意见。这些原则为标准化的英国TRE DAA模板提供了基础,旨在支持不断增长的TREs生态系统。通过提供一个熟悉的结构和术语,该模板旨在在数据所有者和英国公众之间建立信任,并向研究人员明确他们保护数据的义务。广泛采用该方法的目的是加快项目审批速度,从而加速健康数据研究,最终实现更及时、更有效的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using novel data linkage of biobank data with administrative health data to inform genomic analysis for future precision medicine treatment of congenital heart disease Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review Health Data Governance for Research Use in Alberta Establishment of a birth-to-education cohort of 1 million Palestinian refugees using electronic medical records and electronic education records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1