Entomopathogenic fungi as potential biocontrol agents against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Coleoptera: Chrisomelidae: Bruchinae) on stored cowpea seeds
Samir A. M. Abdelgaleil, Hassan A. Gad, Mahmoud M. M. Hassuba, Adel A. Al-Ayat
{"title":"Entomopathogenic fungi as potential biocontrol agents against <i>Callosobruchus maculatus</i> (F.) and <i>Callosobruchus chinensis</i> L. (Coleoptera: Chrisomelidae: Bruchinae) on stored cowpea seeds","authors":"Samir A. M. Abdelgaleil, Hassan A. Gad, Mahmoud M. M. Hassuba, Adel A. Al-Ayat","doi":"10.1080/09670874.2023.2266695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe insecticidal efficacy of four species of Trichoderma genius (T. harzianum, T. citrinoviride, T. viride and T. asperellum) and Metarhizium anisopliae was assessed against Callosobruchus maculatus and C. chinensis on cowpea seeds at concentrations of 2.0 × 106, 2.0 × 107, 2.0 × 108 and 2.0 × 109 conidia/kg. The adult mortality was counted 3 and 7 days after treatment while progeny and seed weight loss were recorded after 45 days. After 7 days, all fungal strains caused significant adult mortality of both insects particularly at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg. Metarhizium anisopliae and T. citrinoviride were the most effective fungi inducing 95 and 93.2% mortalities of C. chinensis at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg, respectively. Callosobruchus chinensis was slightly more susceptible to the fungal strains than C. maculatus. Furthermore, the fungal strains at the highest concentration caused a significant reduction in F1 progeny of both insects. After 45 days, T. harzianum at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg showed the highest protection of cowpea seeds against C. chinensis with weight loss of 6.5%. These findings indicate that the five fungal strains could be implemented in integrated pest management programs of these insects.Keywords: Fungal strainsinsecticidal efficacybiological controlcowpea seedsBruchinae Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":14275,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pest Management","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pest Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2023.2266695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractThe insecticidal efficacy of four species of Trichoderma genius (T. harzianum, T. citrinoviride, T. viride and T. asperellum) and Metarhizium anisopliae was assessed against Callosobruchus maculatus and C. chinensis on cowpea seeds at concentrations of 2.0 × 106, 2.0 × 107, 2.0 × 108 and 2.0 × 109 conidia/kg. The adult mortality was counted 3 and 7 days after treatment while progeny and seed weight loss were recorded after 45 days. After 7 days, all fungal strains caused significant adult mortality of both insects particularly at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg. Metarhizium anisopliae and T. citrinoviride were the most effective fungi inducing 95 and 93.2% mortalities of C. chinensis at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg, respectively. Callosobruchus chinensis was slightly more susceptible to the fungal strains than C. maculatus. Furthermore, the fungal strains at the highest concentration caused a significant reduction in F1 progeny of both insects. After 45 days, T. harzianum at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg showed the highest protection of cowpea seeds against C. chinensis with weight loss of 6.5%. These findings indicate that the five fungal strains could be implemented in integrated pest management programs of these insects.Keywords: Fungal strainsinsecticidal efficacybiological controlcowpea seedsBruchinae Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Pest Management publishes original research papers and reviews concerned with pest management in the broad sense, covering the control of pests (invertebrates, vertebrates and weeds) and diseases of plants, fungi and their products – including biological control, varietal and cultural control, chemical controland interference methods.
The management of invasive species is of special interest. We also encourage submissions dealing with interactions of multiple pests such as arthropods and plant pathogens, pathogens and weeds or weeds and arthropods as well as those dealing with the indirect and direct effects of climate change on sustainable agricultural practices.