Entomopathogenic fungi as potential biocontrol agents against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Coleoptera: Chrisomelidae: Bruchinae) on stored cowpea seeds

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY International Journal of Pest Management Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1080/09670874.2023.2266695
Samir A. M. Abdelgaleil, Hassan A. Gad, Mahmoud M. M. Hassuba, Adel A. Al-Ayat
{"title":"Entomopathogenic fungi as potential biocontrol agents against <i>Callosobruchus maculatus</i> (F.) and <i>Callosobruchus chinensis</i> L. (Coleoptera: Chrisomelidae: Bruchinae) on stored cowpea seeds","authors":"Samir A. M. Abdelgaleil, Hassan A. Gad, Mahmoud M. M. Hassuba, Adel A. Al-Ayat","doi":"10.1080/09670874.2023.2266695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe insecticidal efficacy of four species of Trichoderma genius (T. harzianum, T. citrinoviride, T. viride and T. asperellum) and Metarhizium anisopliae was assessed against Callosobruchus maculatus and C. chinensis on cowpea seeds at concentrations of 2.0 × 106, 2.0 × 107, 2.0 × 108 and 2.0 × 109 conidia/kg. The adult mortality was counted 3 and 7 days after treatment while progeny and seed weight loss were recorded after 45 days. After 7 days, all fungal strains caused significant adult mortality of both insects particularly at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg. Metarhizium anisopliae and T. citrinoviride were the most effective fungi inducing 95 and 93.2% mortalities of C. chinensis at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg, respectively. Callosobruchus chinensis was slightly more susceptible to the fungal strains than C. maculatus. Furthermore, the fungal strains at the highest concentration caused a significant reduction in F1 progeny of both insects. After 45 days, T. harzianum at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg showed the highest protection of cowpea seeds against C. chinensis with weight loss of 6.5%. These findings indicate that the five fungal strains could be implemented in integrated pest management programs of these insects.Keywords: Fungal strainsinsecticidal efficacybiological controlcowpea seedsBruchinae Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":14275,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pest Management","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pest Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2023.2266695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe insecticidal efficacy of four species of Trichoderma genius (T. harzianum, T. citrinoviride, T. viride and T. asperellum) and Metarhizium anisopliae was assessed against Callosobruchus maculatus and C. chinensis on cowpea seeds at concentrations of 2.0 × 106, 2.0 × 107, 2.0 × 108 and 2.0 × 109 conidia/kg. The adult mortality was counted 3 and 7 days after treatment while progeny and seed weight loss were recorded after 45 days. After 7 days, all fungal strains caused significant adult mortality of both insects particularly at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg. Metarhizium anisopliae and T. citrinoviride were the most effective fungi inducing 95 and 93.2% mortalities of C. chinensis at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg, respectively. Callosobruchus chinensis was slightly more susceptible to the fungal strains than C. maculatus. Furthermore, the fungal strains at the highest concentration caused a significant reduction in F1 progeny of both insects. After 45 days, T. harzianum at 2.0 × 109 spores/kg showed the highest protection of cowpea seeds against C. chinensis with weight loss of 6.5%. These findings indicate that the five fungal strains could be implemented in integrated pest management programs of these insects.Keywords: Fungal strainsinsecticidal efficacybiological controlcowpea seedsBruchinae Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昆虫病原真菌在豇豆种子上潜在的防虫剂——斑点小胼蚧和中国小胼蚧
摘要以2 × 106、2 × 107、2 × 108和2 × 109分生菌/kg浓度的豇豆种子为研究对象,评价了4种黑霉、黄绿霉、绿霉和曲霉的杀虫效果。处理后第3天和第7天分别记录成虫死亡率,45天后记录子代和种子失重。7 d后,所有菌株对两种昆虫的成虫死亡率均有显著影响,特别是在2.0 × 109孢子/kg时。在2.0 × 109孢子/kg时,绿僵菌和柠檬酸绿僵菌的死亡率分别为95%和93.2%。中国Callosobruchus对真菌菌株的敏感性略高于maculatus。此外,在最高浓度下,真菌菌株显著降低了两种昆虫的F1后代。处理45 d后,2.0 × 109孢子/kg浓度的哈兹坦菌对豇豆种子的保护效果最好,减重6.5%。研究结果表明,这5株真菌可用于害虫综合治理。关键词:真菌菌株;杀虫效果;生物防治;豇豆种子;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Pest Management publishes original research papers and reviews concerned with pest management in the broad sense, covering the control of pests (invertebrates, vertebrates and weeds) and diseases of plants, fungi and their products – including biological control, varietal and cultural control, chemical controland interference methods. The management of invasive species is of special interest. We also encourage submissions dealing with interactions of multiple pests such as arthropods and plant pathogens, pathogens and weeds or weeds and arthropods as well as those dealing with the indirect and direct effects of climate change on sustainable agricultural practices.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of meso-dispensers for mating disruption of fall armyworm in maize Plant parasitic nematode management using antagonistic plants as a potential substitute to hazardous chemical control – a review Evaluation of biocontrol agents along with pesticide against leopard moth, Zeuzera multistrigata moore (lepidoptera: cossidae) in apple Fuzzy logic in the analysis of interspecific competition of wandering spiders feeding on Ectropis obliqua (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in tea plantations of China Herbicide management for horseweed (Conyza spp.) control in post-emergence under flooded rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1